Literature DB >> 30623528

Holding steady: Little change in intensity or timing of bird migration over the Gulf of Mexico.

Kyle G Horton1, Benjamin M Van Doren2, Frank A La Sorte1, Emily B Cohen3, Hannah L Clipp4, Jeffrey J Buler4, Daniel Fink1, Jeffrey F Kelly5,6, Andrew Farnsworth1.   

Abstract

Quantifying the timing and intensity of migratory movements is imperative for understanding impacts of changing landscapes and climates on migratory bird populations. Billions of birds migrate in the Western Hemisphere, but accurately estimating the population size of one migratory species, let alone hundreds, presents numerous obstacles. Here, we quantify the timing, intensity, and distribution of bird migration through one of the largest migration corridors in the Western Hemisphere, the Gulf of Mexico (the Gulf). We further assess whether there have been changes in migration timing or intensity through the Gulf. To achieve this, we integrate citizen science (eBird) observations with 21 years of weather surveillance radar data (1995-2015). We predicted no change in migration timing and a decline in migration intensity across the time series. We estimate that an average of 2.1 billion birds pass through this region each spring en route to Nearctic breeding grounds. Annually, half of these individuals pass through the region in just 18 days, between April 19 and May 7. The western region of the Gulf showed a mean rate of passage 5.4 times higher than the central and eastern regions. We did not detect an overall change in the annual numbers of migrants (2007-2015) or the annual timing of peak migration (1995-2015). However, we found that the earliest seasonal movements through the region occurred significantly earlier over time (1.6 days decade-1 ). Additionally, body mass and migration distance explained the magnitude of phenological changes, with the most rapid advances occurring with an assemblage of larger-bodied shorter-distance migrants. Our results provide baseline information that can be used to advance our understanding of the developing implications of climate change, urbanization, and energy development for migratory bird populations in North America.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  Gulf of Mexico; climate change; eBird; migratory birds; phenology; weather surveillance radar

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30623528     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  9 in total

1.  Weather at the winter and stopover areas determines spring migration onset, progress, and advancements in Afro-Palearctic migrant birds.

Authors:  Birgen Haest; Ommo Hüppop; Franz Bairlein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Migratory flight on the Pacific Flyway: strategies and tendencies of wind drift compensation.

Authors:  Patrick B Newcombe; Cecilia Nilsson; Tsung-Yu Lin; Kevin Winner; Garrett Bernstein; Subhransu Maji; Daniel Sheldon; Andrew Farnsworth; Kyle G Horton
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  LunAero: Automated "smart" hardware for recording video of nocturnal migration.

Authors:  Wesley T Honeycutt; Alyse V Heaston; Jeffrey F Kelly; Eli S Bridge
Journal:  HardwareX       Date:  2020-03-18

4.  Migratory connectivity then and now: a northward shift in breeding origins of a long-distance migratory bird wintering in the tropics.

Authors:  Camila Gómez; Keith A Hobson; Nicholas J Bayly; Kenneth V Rosenberg; Andrea Morales-Rozo; Paula Cardozo; Carlos Daniel Cadena
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  A weather surveillance radar view of Alaskan avian migration.

Authors:  Ashwin H Sivakumar; Daniel Sheldon; Kevin Winner; Carolyn S Burt; Kyle G Horton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Drivers of fatal bird collisions in an urban center.

Authors:  Benjamin M Van Doren; David E Willard; Mary Hennen; Kyle G Horton; Erica F Stuber; Daniel Sheldon; Ashwin H Sivakumar; Julia Wang; Andrew Farnsworth; Benjamin M Winger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Non-parallel changes in songbird migration timing are not explained by changes in stopover duration.

Authors:  Nicholas N Dorian; Trevor L Lloyd-Evans; J Michael Reed
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Conceptual Framework for Assessing Ecosystem Health.

Authors:  Mark A Harwell; John H Gentile; Larry D McKinney; John W Tunnell; William C Dennison; R Heath Kelsey; Kiersten M Stanzel; Gregory W Stunz; Kim Withers; Jace Tunnell
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 2.992

9.  Near-term ecological forecasting for dynamic aeroconservation of migratory birds.

Authors:  Kyle G Horton; Benjamin M Van Doren; Heidi J Albers; Andrew Farnsworth; Daniel Sheldon
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 7.563

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.