| Literature DB >> 30623256 |
Anna Herminghaus1, Henrike Papenbrock2, Rebecca Eberhardt2, Christian Vollmer2, Richard Truse2, Jan Schulz2, Inge Bauer2, Adelheid Weidinger3, Andrey V Kozlov3, Johnny Stiban4, Olaf Picker2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that early adaptive responses of hepatic mitochondria occur in experimentally induced sepsis. Little is known about both colonic mitochondrial function during abdominal infection and long-term changes in mitochondrial function under inflammatory conditions. We hypothesize that hepatic and colonic mitochondrial oxygen consumption changes time-dependently after sterile laparotomy and in the course of abdominal infection. The aim of the present study was to investigate the hepatic and colonic mitochondrial respiration after sterile laparotomy and abdominal infection over up to 96 h.Entities:
Keywords: Abdominal infection; Colon; Liver; Mitochondrial function; Sepsis; Time course
Year: 2019 PMID: 30623256 PMCID: PMC6325055 DOI: 10.1186/s40635-018-0219-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intensive Care Med Exp ISSN: 2197-425X
Clinical score (all changes refer to the baseline)
| Examination | Results | |
|---|---|---|
| Body weight | Weight loss in % | % < 5 ⇒ 0 P |
| Appearance | 1. Normal appearance, fur smooth, clean | ⇒ 0 P |
| 2. Slight grooming deficiency, rough fur | ⇒ 1 P | |
| 3. Increasing grooming deficiency, rings around eyes, anus | ⇒ 2 P | |
| 4. Clear grooming deficiency, crusty eyes, bedding sticks to anus | ⇒ 3 P | |
| Spontaneous behaviour | 1. Rat investigates cage, active | ⇒ 0 P |
| 2. Rat remains in one place, movement of entire body present | ⇒ 1 P | |
| 3. Hunched posture, swaying gait | ⇒ 3 P | |
| 4. Immobile, lateral position | ⇒ 10 P | |
| Provoked behaviour | 1. Rat flees when opening cage, strong muscle tonus | ⇒ 0 P |
| 2. Rat flees when hand approaches | ⇒ 1 P | |
| 3. Rat flees when touched | ⇒ 2 P | |
| 4. No flight reaction | ⇒ 3 P | |
| Breathing frequency | Difference in % | % < 10 ⇒ 0 P |
| Expiratory breathing sound | No | ⇒ 0 P |
| Yes | ⇒ 1 P | |
| Abdominal palpation | 1. No pain when applying pressure, soft abdomen | ⇒ 0 P |
| 2. Slight reaction to abdominal palpation, soft abdomen | ⇒ 1 P | |
| 3. Clear pain reaction to abdominal palpation, abdominal resistance | ⇒ 2 P | |
| 4. Clear pain reaction to abdominal palpation, hard abdomen | ⇒ 3 P | |
| Condition of droppings | 1. A lot of normal droppings in cage, defecating during examination | ⇒ 0 P |
| 2. A lot of droppings in cage, droppings with blood, runny or mucous | ⇒ 1 P | |
| 3. Few droppings in cage, independent of the condition | ⇒ 2 P | |
| 4. No droppings in cage | ⇒ 3 P |
Fig. 1Time course of clinical score in sham- (black bars) or CASP- (grey bars) operated animals. Clinical score was monitored and assessed according to Table 1 (see the “Materials and methods” section). Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 12, CASP 24 h n = 11)
Fig. 2Markers of inflammation change in a time-dependent manner in the course of abdominal infection. Plasma levels of IL-6 (a), TNF-α (b), and IL-10 (c) were analysed at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h post operation (sham operation, light grey bars; CASP, dark grey bars). Healthy, non-operated rats served as controls (straight horizontal dotted line). Data are shown as mean ± SD (controls n = 9, sham n = 12, CASP 24 h n = 11, other CASP groups n = 12, *p < 0.05 vs. controls, #p < 0.05 vs. sham, between groups
Laboratory chemical parameters for organ damage: creatinine and urea for kidney; AST, ALT, and LDH for liver
| Creatinine | Urea | AST | ALT | LDH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.32 ± 0.15 | 32.33 ± 5.79 | 67.17 ± 14.32 | 47.67 ± 8.87 | 236.83 ± 143.83 |
| Sham 24 h | 0.28 ± 0.06 | 39.25 ± 9.20 | 148.25 ± 61.92* | 53.92 ± 16.53 | 216.50 ± 82.32 |
| CASP 24 h | 0.29 ± 0.03 | 33.60 ± 4.33 | 138.30 ± 37.48* | 41.00 ± 12.21# | 182.70 ± 24.47 |
| Sham 48 h | 0.28 ± 0.05 | 36.33 ± 6.34 | 103.33 ± 41.41 | 52.33 ± 7.01 | 211.33 ± 194.04 |
| CASP 48 h | 0.35 ± 0.18 | 52.16 ± 36.37* # | 124.83 ± 52.93* | 49.17 ± 16.61 | 237.17 ± 150.08 |
| Sham 72 h | 0.29 ± 0.03 | 34.75 ± 4.33 | 75.33 ± 11.02 | 49.00 ± 9.67 | 151.92 ± 44.8 |
| CASP 72 h | 0.31 ± 0.03 | 39.92 ± 4.40 | 65.00 ± 9.87 | 40.17 ± 7.92 | 137.67 ± 30.12 |
| Sham 96 h | 0.33 ± 0.05 | 37.25 ± 3.22 | 87.83 ± 36.12 | 53.67 ± 16.79 | 163.58 ± 75.78 |
| CASP 96 h | 0.30 ± 0.00 | 33.67 ± 6.20 | 87.83 ± 42.65 | 42.75 ± 9.96 | 180.58 ± 156.22 |
Data are shown as mean ± SD, *p < 0.05 vs. controls, #p < 0.05 vs. sham (controls n = 9, sham n = 12, CASP 24 h n = 11, other CASP groups n = 12)
Fig. 3The RCR (state 3/state 2) for complex I (a) and complex II (b) was measured in liver homogenates from each group (control, straight horizontal dotted line; sham-operated, light grey bars; CASP-operated, dark grey bars), in a time-dependent manner. The ADP/O ratio for complex I (c) and complex II (d) in liver homogenates of the same groups was also measured. *p < 0.05 vs. control, #p < 0.05 vs. sham, between groups, data are shown as mean ± SD (control n = 9, sham n = 12, CASP n = 11–12, the value for each animal was calculated as the mean of three technical replicates)
Respiratory control ratio (state 3/state 2) for complexes I and II and ADP/O ratio for complexes I and II in the colon homogenate, data are shown as mean ± SD (control n = 9, sham n = 12, CASP n = 11–12, the value for each animal was calculated as the mean of three technical replicates)
| Colon, RCR, complex I | Colon, RCR, complex II | Colon, ADP/O, complex I | Colon, ADP/O, complex II | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 5.60 ± 1.73 | 5.05 ± 1.02 | 1.43 ± 0.53 | 0.99 ± 0.17 |
| Sham 24 h | 4.46 ± 1.21 | 4.33 ± 0.96 | 1.59 ± 1.61 | 0.91 ± 0.64 |
| CASP 24 h | 5.60 ± 1.67 | 4.99 ± 0.73 | 1.46 ± 1.40 | 0.72 ± 0.20 |
| Sham 48 h | 5.24 ± 2.23 | 4.70 ± 0.66 | 1.56 ± 0.40 | 1.15 ± 0.24 |
| CASP 48 h | 4.86 ± 1.49 | 5.34 ± 2.12 | 1.96 ± 0.64 | 1.38 ± 0.57 |
| Sham 72 h | 5.32 ± 1.66 | 4.87 ± 1.01 | 1.95 ± 0.68 | 1.22 ± 0.50 |
| CASP 72 h | 5.16 ± 1.50 | 5.10 ± 0.98 | 1.98 ± 0.69 | 1.34 ± 0.50 |
| Sham 96 h | 5.23 ± 1.98 | 4.64 ± 0.87 | 1.94 ± 0.71 | 1.09 ± 0.40 |
| CASP 96 h | 5.14 ± 2.27 | 4.77 ± 1.41 | 2.34 ± 1.74 | 1.20 ± 0.20 |
Fig. 4Assessment of MDA levels in the liver and colon tissue homogenates. MDA levels were detected by condensation with thiobarbituric acid and normalized to protein concentration in the liver (a) and colon (b) tissue homogenates. Data are shown as mean ± SD, *p < 0.05 vs. healthy controls, between groups (control n = 9, sham n = 12, CASP n = 11–12)