BACKGROUND: The relevance of mitochondrial dysfunction as to pathogenesis of multiple organ dysfunction and failure in sepsis is controversial. This focused review evaluates the evidence for impaired mitochondrial function in sepsis. DESIGN: Review of original studies in experimental sepsis animal models and clinical studies on mitochondrial function in sepsis. In vitro studies solely on cells and tissues were excluded. PubMed was searched for articles published between 1964 and July 2012. RESULTS: Data from animal experiments (rodents and pigs) and from clinical studies of septic critically ill patients and human volunteers were included. A clear pattern of sepsis-related changes in mitochondrial function is missing in all species. The wide range of sepsis models, length of experiments, presence or absence of fluid resuscitation and methods to measure mitochondrial function may contribute to the contradictory findings. A consistent finding was the high variability of mitochondrial function also in control conditions and between organs. CONCLUSION: Mitochondrial function in sepsis is highly variable, organ specific and changes over the course of sepsis. Patients who will die from sepsis may be more affected than survivors. Nevertheless, the current data from mostly young and otherwise healthy animals does not support the view that mitochondrial dysfunction is the general denominator for multiple organ failure in severe sepsis and septic shock. Whether this is true if underlying comorbidities are present, especially in older patients, should be addressed in further studies.
BACKGROUND: The relevance of mitochondrial dysfunction as to pathogenesis of multiple organ dysfunction and failure in sepsis is controversial. This focused review evaluates the evidence for impaired mitochondrial function in sepsis. DESIGN: Review of original studies in experimental sepsis animal models and clinical studies on mitochondrial function in sepsis. In vitro studies solely on cells and tissues were excluded. PubMed was searched for articles published between 1964 and July 2012. RESULTS: Data from animal experiments (rodents and pigs) and from clinical studies of septic critically illpatients and human volunteers were included. A clear pattern of sepsis-related changes in mitochondrial function is missing in all species. The wide range of sepsis models, length of experiments, presence or absence of fluid resuscitation and methods to measure mitochondrial function may contribute to the contradictory findings. A consistent finding was the high variability of mitochondrial function also in control conditions and between organs. CONCLUSION: Mitochondrial function in sepsis is highly variable, organ specific and changes over the course of sepsis. Patients who will die from sepsis may be more affected than survivors. Nevertheless, the current data from mostly young and otherwise healthy animals does not support the view that mitochondrial dysfunction is the general denominator for multiple organ failure in severe sepsis and septic shock. Whether this is true if underlying comorbidities are present, especially in older patients, should be addressed in further studies.
Authors: Frantz R Poulsen; Mette Schulz; Anne Jacobsen; Åse B Andersen; Lykke Larsen; Wilhelm Schalén; Troels H Nielsen; Carl-Henrik Nordström Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Federico Aletti; Elisa Maffioli; Armando Negri; Marco H Santamaria; Frank A DeLano; Erik B Kistler; Geert W Schmid-Schönbein; Gabriella Tedeschi Journal: Shock Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Michael A Ferguson; Robert M Sutton; Michael Karlsson; Fredrik Sjövall; Lance B Becker; Robert A Berg; Susan S Margulies; Todd J Kilbaugh Journal: J Bioenerg Biomembr Date: 2016-03-28 Impact factor: 2.945
Authors: Alessandro Protti; Francesco Fortunato; Maria L Caspani; Mauro Pluderi; Valeria Lucchini; Nadia Grimoldi; Luigi P Solimeno; Gigliola Fagiolari; Patrizia Ciscato; Samis M A Zella; Maurizio Moggio; Giacomo P Comi; Luciano Gattinoni Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-05-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Victor Jeger; Sebastian Brandt; Francesca Porta; Stephan M Jakob; Jukka Takala; Siamak Djafarzadeh Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-01-12 Impact factor: 3.411