Mihaela C Cristea1, Paul Frankel2, Timothy Synold3, Saul Rivkin4, Dean Lim5, Vincent Chung5, Joseph Chao5, Mark Wakabayashi6, Benjamin Paz7, Ernest Han6, Paul Lin6, Lucille Leong5, Amy Hakim6, Mary Carroll5, Neal Prakash8, Thanh Dellinger6, Min Park4, Robert J Morgan5. 1. Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA. mcristea@coh.org. 2. Division of Biostatistics, Department of Information Sciences, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA. 3. Department of Cancer Biology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA. 4. Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA, USA. 5. Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA. 6. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA. 7. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA. 8. Division of Neurology, Department of Medical Specialties, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate intraperitoneal (IP) nab-paclitaxel in patients with advanced malignancies that are primarily confined to the peritoneal cavity in a phase I trial. METHODS: Using a 3 + 3 dose escalation of IP nab-paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle, we evaluated six dose levels (35-175 mg/m2/dose). Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of IP nab-paclitaxel were determined. RESULTS: There were no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in cohorts 1-3. There was a DLT in one of six patients in cohort 4 (112.5 mg/m2) (grade 3 neutropenia causing treatment delay > 15 days) and a DLT in one of three patients in cohort 6 (175 mg/m2) (grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 abdominal pain). A second patient in cohort 6 experienced a serious adverse event (cycle 1, grade 4 ANC ≤ 7 days, cycle 4, grade 2 left ventricular dysfunction). This dose level was determined to be above the MTD. No DLTs were seen in seven patients treated in cohort 5 (140 mg/m2). The MTD of IP nab-paclitaxel was established at 140 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. There was a PK advantage for IP nab-paclitaxel, with an IP plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) ratio of 147-fold (range 50-403) and therapeutic range systemic drug levels. Eight of 27 enrolled patients had progression-free survival ≥ 6 months. One patient experienced complete response, and one patient experienced partial response. Six patients had stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly IP nab-paclitaxel has a favorable toxicity profile, a significant pharmacologic advantage, and promising clinical activity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00825201.
PURPOSE: To evaluate intraperitoneal (IP) nab-paclitaxel in patients with advanced malignancies that are primarily confined to the peritoneal cavity in a phase I trial. METHODS: Using a 3 + 3 dose escalation of IP nab-paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle, we evaluated six dose levels (35-175 mg/m2/dose). Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of IP nab-paclitaxel were determined. RESULTS: There were no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in cohorts 1-3. There was a DLT in one of six patients in cohort 4 (112.5 mg/m2) (grade 3 neutropenia causing treatment delay > 15 days) and a DLT in one of three patients in cohort 6 (175 mg/m2) (grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 abdominal pain). A second patient in cohort 6 experienced a serious adverse event (cycle 1, grade 4 ANC ≤ 7 days, cycle 4, grade 2 left ventricular dysfunction). This dose level was determined to be above the MTD. No DLTs were seen in seven patients treated in cohort 5 (140 mg/m2). The MTD of IP nab-paclitaxel was established at 140 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. There was a PK advantage for IP nab-paclitaxel, with an IP plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) ratio of 147-fold (range 50-403) and therapeutic range systemic drug levels. Eight of 27 enrolled patients had progression-free survival ≥ 6 months. One patient experienced complete response, and one patient experienced partial response. Six patients had stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly IP nab-paclitaxel has a favorable toxicity profile, a significant pharmacologic advantage, and promising clinical activity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00825201.
Authors: M Markman; B N Bundy; D S Alberts; J M Fowler; D L Clark-Pearson; L F Carson; S Wadler; J Sickel Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-02-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mark A Socinski; Igor Bondarenko; Nina A Karaseva; Anatoly M Makhson; Igor Vynnychenko; Isamu Okamoto; Jeremy K Hon; Vera Hirsh; Paul Bhar; Hui Zhang; Jose L Iglesias; Markus F Renschler Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-04-30 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M Markman; E Rowinsky; T Hakes; B Reichman; W Jones; J L Lewis; S Rubin; J Curtin; R Barakat; M Phillips Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1992-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Alexi A Wright; Angel Cronin; Dana E Milne; Michael A Bookman; Robert A Burger; David E Cohn; Mihaela C Cristea; Jennifer J Griggs; Nancy L Keating; Charles F Levenback; Gina Mantia-Smaldone; Ursula A Matulonis; Larissa A Meyer; Joyce C Niland; Jane C Weeks; David M O'Malley Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-08-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Daniel D Von Hoff; Thomas Ervin; Francis P Arena; E Gabriela Chiorean; Jeffrey Infante; Malcolm Moore; Thomas Seay; Sergei A Tjulandin; Wen Wee Ma; Mansoor N Saleh; Marion Harris; Michele Reni; Scot Dowden; Daniel Laheru; Nathan Bahary; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Josep Tabernero; Manuel Hidalgo; David Goldstein; Eric Van Cutsem; Xinyu Wei; Jose Iglesias; Markus F Renschler Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-10-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Joanne L Blum; Michael A Savin; Gerald Edelman; John E Pippen; Nicholas J Robert; Brian V Geister; Robert L Kirby; Alicia Clawson; Joyce A O'Shaughnessy Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Travis E Grotz; Jennifer A Yonkus; Cornelius A Thiels; Susanne G Warner; Robert R McWilliams; Amit Mahipal; Tanios S Bekaii-Saab; Sean P Cleary; Michael L Kendrick; Mark J Truty Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-08-16 Impact factor: 4.339
Authors: Shelagh Verco; Holly Maulhardt; Michael Baltezor; Emily Williams; Marc Iacobucci; Alison Wendt; James Verco; Alyson Marin; Sam Campbell; Paul Dorman; Gere diZerega Journal: Drug Deliv Transl Res Date: 2020-11-06 Impact factor: 4.617
Authors: Anne G W E Wintjens; Geert A Simkens; Peter-Paul K H Fransen; Narcis Serafras; Kaatje Lenaerts; Gregor H L M Franssen; Ignace H J T de Hingh; Patricia Y W Dankers; Nicole D Bouvy; Andrea Peeters Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 4.510