| Literature DB >> 30622711 |
E Vajana1, I Widmer1,2, E Rochat1, S Duruz1, O Selmoni1, S Vuilleumier3, S Aeby4, G Greub4, S Joost1,5,6.
Abstract
Occurrence of bacteria belonging to the order Chlamydiales was investigated for the first time in common toad (Bufo bufo) tadpole populations collected from 41 ponds in the Geneva metropolitan area, Switzerland. A Chlamydiales-specific real-time PCR was used to detect and amplify the Chlamydiales 16S ribosomal RNA-encoding gene from the tails of 375 tadpoles. We found the studied amphibian populations to host Chlamydia-like organisms (CLOs) attributable to the genera Similichlamydia, Neochlamydia, Protochlamydia and Parachlamydia (all belonging to the family Parachlamydiaceae), Simkania (family Simkaniaceae) and Estrella (family Criblamydiaceae); additionally, DNA from the genus Thermoanaerobacter (family Thermoanaerobacteriaceae) was detected. Global autocorrelation analysis did not reveal a spatial structure in the observed CLOs occurrence rates, and association tests involving land cover characteristics did not evidence any clear effect on CLOs occurrence rates in B. bufo. Although preliminary, these results suggest a random and ubiquitous distribution of CLOs in the environment, which would support the biogeographical expectation 'everything is everywhere' for the concerned microorganisms.Entities:
Keywords: Beta regression; Bufo bufo; Chlamydia-like organisms; Chlamydiales; Geneva urban area; emerging pathogens; global spatial autocorrelation; intracellular bacteria
Year: 2018 PMID: 30622711 PMCID: PMC6307092 DOI: 10.1016/j.nmni.2018.11.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: New Microbes New Infect ISSN: 2052-2975
Fig. 1Spatial representation of sampled ponds. Ponds are represented in red, with numbers corresponding to pond IDs in Table 1. Contextual information in background represents Geneva metropolitan area and highlights forests, agricultural, water and urbanized areas.
Information reported for each pond
| Pond ID | Pond name | Municipality | Longitude | Latitude | No. of inhabitants | N | P | OR | Genus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Étang de l'ancien château de St-Victor | Avully | 5.98 | 46.17 | 394 | 10 | 6 (1) | 0.600 | ? |
| 2 | Étang de la pépinière Jacquet | Satigny | 6.05 | 46.22 | 107 | 13 | 4 | 0.308 | |
| 3 | Étang du signal de Bernex | Bernex | 6.07 | 46.17 | 2038 | 12 | 3 (1) | 0.250 | |
| 4 | Grand Etang des Mouilles | Bernex | 6.08 | 46.19 | 149 | 10 | 4 | 0.400 | |
| 5 | Étang des Evaux | Confignon | 6.09 | 46.19 | 1441 | 10 | 9 | 0.900 | |
| 6 | Étang de la ferme Lignon (PAF) | Vernier | 6.09 | 46.21 | 2725 | 12 | 2 | 0.167 | |
| 7 | Étang Autrichien | Onex | 6.11 | 46.18 | 4750 | 10 | 2 (1) | 0.200 | |
| 8 | Bassin du Parc Louis Bertrand | Lancy | 6.12 | 46.19 | 6340 | 4 | 0 | 0.000 | |
| 9 | Étang Zimmermann | Lancy | 6.12 | 46.19 | 5740 | 5 | 0 | 0.000 | |
| 10 | Étang Perfetta | Lancy | 6.12 | 46.19 | 5829 | 4 | 1 | 0.250 | |
| 11 | Étang Lescaze | Genève | 6.12 | 46.2 | 6393 | 10 | 3 | 0.300 | |
| 12 | Bassin du cimetière de St Georges | Genève | 6.12 | 46.2 | 5963 | 9 | 2 | 0.222 | |
| 13 | Étang Spring | Lancy | 6.12 | 46.19 | 5048 | 10 | 0 | 0.000 | |
| 14 | Bassin du Parc Chuit | Lancy | 6.12 | 46.19 | 4609 | 10 | 4 | 0.400 | |
| 15 | Étang du Pré-d’œufeuf | Plan-les-Ouates | 6.14 | 46.16 | 1574 | 10 | 6 (1) | 0.600 | |
| 16 | Étang Pinchat | Carouge | 6.15 | 46.18 | 7000 | 15 | 2 | 0.133 | |
| 17 | Le Marais | Grand-Saconnex | 6.11 | 46.23 | 7116 | 15 | 10 (1) | 0.667 | |
| 18 | Étang du chemin des Prjins | Grand-Saconnex | 6.12 | 46.23 | 3635 | 7 | 4 | 0.571 | |
| 19 | Bassin du château de Penthes | Pregny-Chambésy | 6.14 | 46.23 | 467 | 5 | 0 | 0.000 | |
| 20 | Étang Berthier | Pregny-Chambésy | 6.15 | 46.23 | 380 | 7 | 0 | 0.000 | |
| 21 | Étang du Jardin Botanique 2 (Serres) | Genève | 6.15 | 46.23 | 2137 | 10 | 6 | 0.600 | |
| 22 | Étang du jardin botanique | Genève | 6.15 | 46.23 | 2336 | 9 | 2 | 0.222 | |
| 23 | Étang Vieux-Clos | Chêne-Bougeries | 6.18 | 46.18 | 911 | 12 | 10 (2) | 0.833 | |
| 24 | Étang Flory | Chêne-Bougeries | 6.18 | 46.19 | 946 | 7 | 1 | 0.143 | |
| 25 | Bassin Waldvogel | Chêne-Bougeries | 6.18 | 46.19 | 2560 | 6 | 5 (2) | 0.833 | |
| 26 | Bassin de la Station de Zoologie | Chêne-Bougeries | 6.18 | 46.19 | 2641 | 11 | 2 | 0.182 | |
| 27 | Étang Richard | Chêne-Bougeries | 6.18 | 46.19 | 1345 | 5 | 5 | 1.000 | |
| 28 | Étang Paradis Haake | Chêne-Bougeries | 6.18 | 46.2 | 4661 | 8 | 2 | 0.250 | |
| 29 | Étang route de Chêne | Chêne-Bougeries | 6.19 | 46.2 | 4342 | 8 | 1 | 0.125 | |
| 30 | Étang Broud | Chêne-Bougeries | 6.19 | 46.2 | 3161 | 10 | 7 (3) | 0.700 | |
| 31 | Étang Hutins | Chêne-Bourg | 6.2 | 46.2 | 6043 | 8 | 7 | 0.875 | |
| 32 | Étang Loutan | Thônex | 6.2 | 46.2 | 6349 | 6 | 1 | 0.167 | |
| 33 | Étang de la clinique Bel-Air | Thônex | 6.21 | 46.21 | 1543 | 9 | 1 | 0.111 | |
| 34 | Étang de Miolan | Choulex | 6.21 | 46.23 | 318 | 8 | 2 (1) | 0.250 | ? |
| 35 | Bassin du Centre horticole Lullier 2 | Jussy | 6.25 | 46.23 | 216 | 8 | 4 (1) | 0.500 | |
| 36 | Étang des Dolliets | Jussy | 6.28 | 46.23 | 23 | 12 | 6 (1) | 0.500 | ? |
| 37 | Bois du Faisan amont | Versoix | 6.15 | 46.28 | 436 | 10 | 1 | 0.100 | |
| 38 | Étang Bon-séjour | Versoix | 6.16 | 46.28 | 3396 | 10 | 5 (1) | 0.500 | |
| 39 | Étang des Douves | Versoix | 6.14 | 46.29 | 51 | 12 | 7 | 0.583 | |
| 40 | Étang Est Pré-Béroux | Versoix | 6.14 | 46.3 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 0.667 | |
| 41 | Étang de Combes-Chapuis | Versoix | 6.12 | 46.3 | 13 | 12 | 4 | 0.333 |
Information includes: experimental and actual name of ponds (pond ID and pond name, respectively), corresponding municipality, geographical coordinates, number of inhabitants within 1 km radius, number of B. bufo tadpoles sampled (N), number of Chlamydia-like organism–positive samples (P), observed occurrence rate (OR) and Chlamydiales taxonomic assignments at genus level.
In parentheses are number of samples (among positive ones) for which a sequence attributable to Chlamydiales was obtained.
Question marks indicate unsolved taxonomic assignations in samples for which a sequence attributable to Chlamydiales was obtained.
Reported number of inhabitants can be partial when pond is located close to French or to Canton of Vaud border (Fig. 1), for which demographic data were not considered.
Fig. 2Observed CLO occurrence rates over Geneva metropolitan area. Circles represent sampling sites (see Fig. 1), with size proportional to the number of tadpoles sampled and hue intensity following gradient in observed occurrence rates. CLO, Chlamydia-like organism.
Fig. 3Global autocorrelation analysis results. Left column reports Moran scatterplots obtained using the first two, four, six, eight and ten nearest neighbours (i.e. ponds), respectively. Right column reports Moran's I reference distributions as obtained for each weighting scenario by permutation tests. Red vertical tick highlights position of observed Moran's I in reference distribution; grey vertical line is drawn to show I = 0 (i.e. null hypothesis). Red horizontal lines pinpoint percentiles 2.5 and 97.5 of reference distributions, underlining range of significant I values.
Fig. 5Results of group comparison tests. P-values are reported on logarithmic scale after multiple testing correction, and as a function of both the radius used to characterize land cover around sampling sites and the clustering method used to classify ponds into environmental groups. In uppermost part of plot, dotted line indicates significance threshold (α = 0.05; thus, −log10α = 1.30). Line discontinuities depict tests not run (i.e. where at least one group was constituted by a single pond).
Fig. 6Results of beta regression analysis. P-values associated with estimated regression coefficients are reported on logarithmic scale after multiple testing correction, and as a function of both the radius used to characterize land cover around sampling sites and the aggregated land cover category. In uppermost part of plot, dotted line indicates significance threshold (α = 0.05; thus, −log10α = 1.30).
Fig. 4Spatial occurrence of observed CLOs and Thermoanaerobacteriaceae. Red circles highlight ponds where each genus was found. Number of infected samples (i.e. tadpoles) is reported for each bacterial genus in brackets (Table 1) and refers to highlighted ponds (e.g. three tadpoles are positive for genus Parachlamydia from same highlighted pond). Grey area in background represents Geneva metropolitan area; size of circles is proportional to number of tadpoles sampled in each sampling site (see Fig. 2). CLO, Chlamydia-like organism.