| Literature DB >> 30621744 |
Gang Liu1,2, Fala Hu3, Xuanfeng Ding4, Xiaoqiang Li4, Qihong Shao5, Yuenan Wang6, Jing Yang2, Hong Quan7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Due to the heterogeneity of patient's individual respiratory motion pattern in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), treatment planning dose assessment using a traditional four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT_traditional) images based on a uniform breathing curve may not represent the true treatment dose delivered to the patient. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accumulated dose discrepancy between based on the 4DCT_traditional and true 4DCT (4DCT_true) that incorporated with the patient's real entire breathing motion. The study also explored a novel 4D robust planning strategy to compensate for such heterogeneity respiratory motion uncertainties.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30621744 PMCID: PMC6323842 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1191-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiat Oncol ISSN: 1748-717X Impact factor: 3.481
Fig. 1Example of a digital lung cancer phantom. The pink contour represents the gross target volume (GTV)
Combination of simulation for the breathing curves
| No. | Mean excursion (mm) | Standard deviation of excursion/mean excursion | Mean period (s) | Standard deviation of period/mean period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 0.25 | 4 | 0.2 |
| 2 | 10 | 0.25 | 4 | 0.2 |
| 3 | 15 | 0.25 | 4 | 0.2 |
| 4 | 20 | 0.25 | 4 | 0.2 |
| 5 | 15 | 0.15 | 4 | 0.2 |
| 6 | 15 | 0.35 | 4 | 0.2 |
| 7 | 15 | 0.25 | 3 | 0.2 |
| 8 | 15 | 0.25 | 5 | 0.2 |
| 9 | 15 | 0.25 | 4 | 0.1 |
| 10 | 15 | 0.25 | 4 | 0.3 |
The detail of plan
| No. | Amplitude (mm) | Duty cycle (s) | Target diameter (cm) | Prescription dose level |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 80% |
| 2 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 80% |
| 3 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 80% |
| 4 | 15 | 4 | 3 | 80% |
| 5 | 15 | 4 | 4 | 80% |
| 6 | 15 | 4 | 3 | 70% |
| 7 | 15 | 4 | 3 | 90% |
| 8 | 20 | 4 | 3 | 80% |
| 9 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 80% |
Fig. 2The robustness setting
Fig. 3Two different simulated digital phantom respiratory motion with a different mean amplitudes and b different standard deviations of the amplitude
Fig. 4a An example for dose volume histograms (DVHs) of the target with different offset values. b An example of cumulative dose DVH for Dnomial and D. Where Dnomial represents the accumulated dose based on the 4DCT_traditional which was used for planning, Dtrue represents the accumulated dose incorpated heterogeneity breathing pattern with mean amplitude 15 mm, standard deviation of amplitude 3.75 mm, mean period 4 s and standard deviation of period 0.8 s
Fig. 5() varies with the a mean amplitude, b standard deviation of the amplitude, c mean period, d standard deviation of the period, e prescription dose level, and f target diameter. The static conditions are: a standard deviation of amplitude/mean amplitude: 0.25, mean period: 4 s, standard deviation of the period/mean period: 0.2, prescription dose level: 80% and target diameter: 3 cm; b mean amplitude: 15 mm, mean period: 4 s, standard deviation of the period/mean period: 0.2, prescription dose level: 80% and target diameter: 3 cm; c mean amplitude: 15 mm, standard deviation of the amplitude/mean amplitude: 0.25, mean period: 4 s, standard deviation of the period/mean period: 0.2, prescription dose level: 80% and target diameter: 3 cm; d mean amplitude: 15 mm, standard deviation of the amplitude/mean amplitude: 0.25, mean period: 4 s, prescription dose level: 80% and target diameter: 3 cm; e mean amplitude: 15 mm, standard deviation of the amplitude/mean amplitude: 0.25, mean period: 4 s, standard deviation of the period/mean period: 0.2, target diameter: 3 cm; f mean amplitude: 15 mm, standard deviation of the amplitude/mean amplitude: 0.25, mean period: 4 s, standard deviation of the period/mean period: 0.2, and prescription dose level: 80%
Fig. 6An example of a patient #3 respiratory motion in the SI direction
Characteristics of the respiratory motion in three patients
| No. | Fraction | Mean excursion (mm) | Standard deviation of excursion/mean excursion | Mean period (s) | Standard deviation of period/mean period |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 10.11 | 0.12 | 4.85 | 0.12 |
| 2 | 10.32 | 0.09 | 4.65 | 0.09 | |
| 3 | 10.14 | 0.12 | 4.95 | 0.08 | |
| 4 | 9.88 | 0.11 | 5.15 | 0.09 | |
| 5 | 8.59 | 0.09 | 5.05 | 0.12 | |
| 2 | 1 | 10.21 | 0.23 | 3.78 | 0.05 |
| 2 | 9.92 | 0.20 | 3.81 | 0.09 | |
| 3 | 10.53 | 0.23 | 3.85 | 0.09 | |
| 4 | 10.62 | 0.25 | 3.39 | 0.15 | |
| 5 | 10.05 | 0.22 | 3.78 | 0.05 | |
| 3 | 1 | 15.28 | 0.23 | 2.71 | 0.08 |
| 2 | 14.36 | 0.20 | 2.79 | 0.08 | |
| 3 | 16.21 | 0.21 | 3.18 | 0.11 | |
| 4 | 15.88 | 0.23 | 3.11 | 0.10 | |
| 5 | 15.20 | 0.22 | 3.06 | 0.10 |
Fig. 7An example of the phase target dose D99 vs tumor position comparison between VMAT and 4D-Ro-VMAT