Literature DB >> 16723765

Estimation of the delivered patient dose in lung IMRT treatment based on deformable registration of 4D-CT data and Monte Carlo simulations.

Stella Flampouri1, Steve B Jiang, Greg C Sharp, John Wolfgang, Abhijit A Patel, Noah C Choi.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to accurately estimate the difference between the planned and the delivered dose due to respiratory motion and free breathing helical CT artefacts for lung IMRT treatments, and to estimate the impact of this difference on clinical outcome. Six patients with representative tumour motion, size and position were selected for this retrospective study. For each patient, we had acquired both a free breathing helical CT and a ten-phase 4D-CT scan. A commercial treatment planning system was used to create four IMRT plans for each patient. The first two plans were based on the GTV as contoured on the free breathing helical CT set, with a GTV to PTV expansion of 1.5 cm and 2.0 cm, respectively. The third plan was based on the ITV, a composite volume formed by the union of the CTV volumes contoured on free breathing helical CT, end-of-inhale (EOI) and end-of-exhale (EOE) 4D-CT. The fourth plan was based on GTV contoured on the EOE 4D-CT. The prescribed dose was 60 Gy for all four plans. Fluence maps and beam setup parameters of the IMRT plans were used by the Monte Carlo dose calculation engine MCSIM for absolute dose calculation on both the free breathing CT and 4D-CT data. CT deformable registration between the breathing phases was performed to estimate the motion trajectory for both the tumour and healthy tissue. Then, a composite dose distribution over the whole breathing cycle was calculated as a final estimate of the delivered dose. EUD values were computed on the basis of the composite dose for all four plans. For the patient with the largest motion effect, the difference in the EUD of CTV between the planed and the delivered doses was 33, 11, 1 and 0 Gy for the first, second, third and fourth plan, respectively. The number of breathing phases required for accurate dose prediction was also investigated. With the advent of 4D-CT, deformable registration and Monte Carlo simulations, it is feasible to perform an accurate calculation of the delivered dose, and compare our delivered dose with doses estimated using prior techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16723765     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/11/006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  33 in total

1.  A method to evaluate dose errors introduced by dose mapping processes for mass conserving deformations.

Authors:  C Yan; G Hugo; F J Salguero; N Saleh-Sayah; E Weiss; W C Sleeman; J V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A novel technique to enable experimental validation of deformable dose accumulation.

Authors:  Carolyn J Niu; Warren D Foltz; Michael Velec; Joanne L Moseley; Adil Al-Mayah; Kristy K Brock
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Dosimetric impact of motion in free-breathing and gated lung radiotherapy: a 4D Monte Carlo study of intrafraction and interfraction effects.

Authors:  Joao Seco; Greg C Sharp; Ziji Wu; David Gierga; Florian Buettner; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Assessment of dose reconstruction errors in image-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Hualiang Zhong; Elisabeth Weiss; Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  A mass-conserving 4D XCAT phantom for dose calculation and accumulation.

Authors:  Christopher L Williams; Pankaj Mishra; Joao Seco; Sara St James; Raymond H Mak; Ross I Berbeco; John H Lewis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Patient-specific quantification of respiratory motion-induced dose uncertainty for step-and-shoot IMRT of lung cancer.

Authors:  Heng Li; Peter Park; Wei Liu; Jason Matney; Zhongxing Liao; Peter Balter; Yupeng Li; Xiaodong Zhang; Xiaoqiang Li; X Ronald Zhu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Dose calculation with respiration-averaged CT processed from cine CT without a respiratory surrogate.

Authors:  Adam C Riegel; Moiz Ahmad; Xiaojun Sun; Tinsu Pan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  A simplified method of four-dimensional dose accumulation using the mean patient density representation.

Authors:  Carri K Glide-Hurst; Geoffrey D Hugo; Jian Liang; Di Yan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Evaluation of 4D dose to a moving target with Monte Carlo dose calculation in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Kiyotomo Matsugi; Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Yuki Miyabe; Chikako Yamauchi; Yukinori Matsuo; Takashi Mizowaki; Masahiro Hiraoka
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-12-18

10.  Assessing four-dimensional radiotherapy planning and respiratory motion-induced dose difference based on biologically effective uniform dose.

Authors:  F-C Su; C Shi; P Mavroidis; V Goytia; R Crownover; P Rassiah-Szegedi; N Papanikolaou
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.