Literature DB >> 30621445

Methods and Challenges in a Cohort Study of Infants and Toddlers With Craniofacial Microsomia: The Clock Study.

Daniela V Luquetti1,2,3, Matthew L Speltz1,2,3, Erin R Wallace1, Babette Siebold1,2, Brent R Collett1,2,3, Amelia F Drake4, Alexis L Johns5, Kathleen A Kapp-Simon6,7, Sara L Kinter1,2, Brian G Leroux8, Leanne Magee9, Susan Norton1,2,3, Kathleen Sie1,2,3, Carrie L Heike1,2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Craniofacial microsomia: Longitudinal Outcomes in Children pre-Kindergarten (CLOCK) study is a longitudinal cohort study of neurobehavioral outcomes in infants and toddlers with craniofacial microsomia (CFM). In this article, we review the data collection and methods used to characterize this complex condition and describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of the cohort.
SETTING: Craniofacial and otolaryngology clinics at 5 study sites. PARTICIPANTS: Infants with CFM and unaffected infants (controls) ages 12 to 24 months were recruited from the same geographical regions and followed to age 36 to 48 months.
METHODS: Phenotypic, neurodevelopmental, and facial expression assessments were completed during the first and third waves of data collection (time 1 and time 3, respectively). Medical history data were taken at both of these time points and during an intermediate parent phone interview (time 2).
RESULTS: Our cohort includes 108 cases and 84 controls. Most cases and controls identified as white and 55% of cases and 37% of controls identified as Hispanic. Nearly all cases had microtia (95%) and 59% had mandibular hypoplasia. Cases received extensive clinical care in infancy, with 59% receiving care in a craniofacial clinic and 28% experiencing at least one surgery. Study visits were completed at a study site (92%) or at the participant's home (8%).
CONCLUSIONS: The CLOCK study represents an effort to overcome the challenges of characterizing the phenotypic and neurodevelopmental outcomes of CFM in a large, demographically and geographically diverse cohort.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cohort; craniofacial microsomia; hemifacial microsomia; methods; oculoauriculovertebral spectrum

Year:  2019        PMID: 30621445      PMCID: PMC6996714          DOI: 10.1177/1055665618821014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J        ISSN: 1055-6656


  38 in total

1.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  Hemifacial microsomia: use of the OMENS-Plus classification at the Royal Children's Hospital of Melbourne.

Authors:  Christopher C-H Poon; John G Meara; Andrew A C Heggie
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Clarifying the relationships among the different features of the OMENS+ classification in craniofacial microsomia.

Authors:  A Jorien Tuin; Youssef Tahiri; Kaitlyn M Paine; J Thomas Paliga; Jesse A Taylor; Scott P Bartlett
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Evaluation of ICD-9-CM codes for craniofacial microsomia.

Authors:  Daniela V Luquetti; Babette S Saltzman; Daniela Vivaldi; Luiz A Pimenta; Anne V Hing; Cynthia H Cassell; Jacqueline R Starr; Carrie L Heike
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2012-08-18

5.  Facial Expressiveness in Infants With and Without Craniofacial Microsomia: Preliminary Findings.

Authors:  Zakia Hammal; Jeffrey F Cohn; Erin R Wallace; Carrie L Heike; Craig B Birgfeld; Harriet Oster; Matthew L Speltz
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2018-01-29

Review 6.  Hemifacial microsomia: clinical features and pictographic representations of the OMENS classification system.

Authors:  Alexander J Gougoutas; Davinder J Singh; David W Low; Scott P Bartlett
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 7.  Clinical care in craniofacial microsomia: a review of current management recommendations and opportunities to advance research.

Authors:  C L Heike; A V Hing; C A Aspinall; S P Bartlett; C B Birgfeld; A F Drake; L A Pimenta; K C Sie; M M Urata; D Vivaldi; D V Luquetti
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.908

8.  Microtia: a microform of hemifacial microsomia.

Authors:  R D Bennun; J B Mulliken; L B Kaban; J E Murray
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Photographic protocol for image acquisition in craniofacial microsomia.

Authors:  Carrie L Heike; Laura P Stueckle; Erik T Stuhaug; Luiz A Pimenta; Amelia F Drake; Daniela Vivaldi; Kathleen C Y Sie; Craig B Birgfeld
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 2.151

10.  Reliable classification of facial phenotypic variation in craniofacial microsomia: a comparison of physical exam and photographs.

Authors:  Craig B Birgfeld; Carrie L Heike; Babette S Saltzman; Brian G Leroux; Kelly N Evans; Daniela V Luquetti
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.151

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of prenatal diabetes mellitus and other risk factors for craniofacial microsomia.

Authors:  Babette Siebold; Carrie L Heike; Brian G Leroux; Matthew L Speltz; Amelia F Drake; Alexis L Johns; Kathleen A Kapp-Simon; Leanne Magee; Daniela V Luquetti
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Behavioral Adjustment of Preschool Children With and Without Craniofacial Microsomia.

Authors:  Alexis L Johns; Erin R Wallace; Brent R Collett; Kathleen A Kapp-Simon; Amelia F Drake; Carrie L Heike; Sara L Kinter; Daniela V Luquetti; Leanne Magee; Susan Norton; Kathleen Sie; Matthew L Speltz
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2020-08-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.