Literature DB >> 25539322

Clarifying the relationships among the different features of the OMENS+ classification in craniofacial microsomia.

A Jorien Tuin1, Youssef Tahiri, Kaitlyn M Paine, J Thomas Paliga, Jesse A Taylor, Scott P Bartlett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The OMENS+ classification is commonly used to describe the phenotypically diverse craniofacial features of craniofacial microsomia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate associations among the individual components of the OMENS+ criteria.
METHODS: An institutional review board-approved retrospective chart review was performed for patients who presented with a diagnosis of unilateral or bilateral craniofacial microsomia to the craniofacial clinic from January of 1990 to December of 2012. Demographic, diagnosis, classification, treatment, and radiographic data were abstracted for all patients who met inclusion criteria. Associations and correlations were evaluated using the Spearman rank test and a logistic regression model.
RESULTS: One hundred five patients (61 male and 44 female) with craniofacial microsomia met inclusion criteria. Eighty-one patients (77.1 percent) had unilateral microsomia and 24 (22.9 percent) had bilateral microsomia. Twenty-eight patients (26.7 percent) had macrostomia. Correlations were all significantly interrelated (p = 0.000 to p = 00.018) between the degree of orbital, mandibular, and soft-tissue deformities. Moreover, the severity of ear deformity and facial nerve involvement were also significantly correlated (p = 0.008). Between these two groupings, there was a significant correlation between soft-tissue deficiency and nerve involvement (p = 0.010). Macrostomia was associated with the individual components of the group orbit (p = 0.008), mandible (p = 0.000), and soft tissue (p = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: The association between structures using the OMENS+ classification may be caused by their branchial arch origin. Structures mainly developed from the first branchial arch (orbit, mandible, and soft tissue) are associated in degree of severity, as are the structures mainly derived from the second branchial arch (facial nerve and ear). CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25539322     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  9 in total

1.  Methods and Challenges in a Cohort Study of Infants and Toddlers With Craniofacial Microsomia: The Clock Study.

Authors:  Daniela V Luquetti; Matthew L Speltz; Erin R Wallace; Babette Siebold; Brent R Collett; Amelia F Drake; Alexis L Johns; Kathleen A Kapp-Simon; Sara L Kinter; Brian G Leroux; Leanne Magee; Susan Norton; Kathleen Sie; Carrie L Heike
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2019-01-08

Review 2.  Craniofacial malformations and their association with brain development: the importance of a multidisciplinary approach for treatment.

Authors:  Asher Ornoy
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Neurodevelopment of Infants with and without Craniofacial Microsomia.

Authors:  Matthew L Speltz; Kathleen A Kapp-Simon; Alexis L Johns; Erin R Wallace; Brent R Collett; Leanne Magee; Brian G Leroux; Daniela V Luquetti; Carrie L Heike
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2018-04-22       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  A Mutation in VWA1, Encoding von Willebrand Factor A Domain-Containing Protein 1, Is Associated With Hemifacial Microsomia.

Authors:  Yibei Wang; Lu Ping; Xiaodong Luan; Yushan Chen; Xinmiao Fan; Lianyan Li; Yaping Liu; Pu Wang; Shuyang Zhang; Bo Zhang; Xiaowei Chen
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-09-09

5.  Speech, Language, and Communication Skills of Adolescents With Craniofacial Microsomia.

Authors:  Brent R Collett; Kathy Chapman; Erin R Wallace; Sara L Kinter; Carrie L Heike; Matthew L Speltz; Martha Werler
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Surgical Classification of the Mandibular Deformity in Craniofacial Microsomia Using 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Jordan W Swanson; Brianne T Mitchell; Jason A Wink; Jesse A Taylor; Scott P Bartlett
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-02-05

7.  Mandibular Fracture in a Hemifacial Microsomia Patient following Implant Failure and Hardware Infection: A Case Report.

Authors:  Kausar Ali; Rami P Dibbs; Renata S Maricevich
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2022-09-23

8.  Whole-Exome Sequencing Reveals Rare Germline Mutations in Patients With Hemifacial Microsomia.

Authors:  Xiaojun Chen; Fatao Liu; Zin Mar Aung; Yan Zhang; Gang Chai
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Distribution and phenotypes of hemifacial microsomia and its association with other anomalies.

Authors:  Il-Hyung Yang; Jee Hyeok Chung; Sunjin Yim; Il-Sik Cho; Seung-Weon Lim; Kikap Kim; Sukwha Kim; Jin-Young Choi; Jong-Ho Lee; Myung-Jin Kim; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 1.372

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.