| Literature DB >> 30621038 |
Hector A Tinoco1,2,3, Carlos I Cardona4, Fabio M Peña5, Juan P Gomez6, Samuel I Roldan-Restrepo7, Maria A Velasco-Mejia8, Daniel R Barco9.
Abstract
This study exposes the assessment of a piezo-actuated sensor for monitoring elastic variations (change in Young's modulus) of a host structure in which it is attached. The host structure is monitored through a coupling interface connected to the piezo-actuated device. Two coupling interfaces were considered (an aluminum cone and a human tooth) for the experimental tests. Three different materials (aluminum, bronze and steel) were prepared to emulate the elastic changes in the support, keeping the geometry as a fixed parameter. The piezo device was characterized from velocity frequency response functions in pursuance to understand how vibration modes stimulate the electrical resistance through electrical resonance peaks of the sensor. An impedance-based analysis (1⁻20 kHz) was performed to correlate elastic variations with indexes based on root mean square deviation (RMSD) for two observation windows (9.3 to 9.7 kHz and 11.1 to 11.5 kHz). Results show that imposed elastic variations were detected and quantified with the electrical resistance measurements. Moreover, it was demonstrated that the sensitivity of the device was influenced by the type of coupling interface since the cone was more sensitive than the tooth in both observation windows. As a final consideration, results suggest that bio-structures (fruits and bone, among others) could be studied since these can modify naturally its elastic properties.Entities:
Keywords: bio-monitoring; elastic variations; electromechanical impedance technique; piezo-actuated sensor; structural health monitoring; vibration through teeth
Year: 2019 PMID: 30621038 PMCID: PMC6339132 DOI: 10.3390/s19010184
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Scheme of a coupled electromechanical system of one degree of freedom with stiffness variations in the host structure.
Figure 2(a) Piezo-device design, dimensions and measurement points. (b) Piezo-device working principle.
Figure 3Experimental setup for the velocity measurements.
Figure 4(a) Experimental setup for electromechanical impedance measurements. (b) Dimensions and materials for the monitoring structure including the coupling interface. (c) Materials for the experiment.
Figure 5Velocity measurements. (a) Piezoelectric patch (P1, P2, P3, P4). (b) Wire and mass (P5, P6, P7).
Figure 6Comparison between velocity and electrical resistance, (a) 1–2 kHz. (b) 6–15 kHz.
Figure 7(a) Electrical resistance for experiments 1 and 2 in the frequency spectrum 8 kHz–15 kHz. (b) Electrical resistance signals in the first monitoring window (9.3–9.7 kHz). (c) Electrical resistance signals in the second monitoring window (11.1–11.5 kHz).
Figure 8Root mean square deviation (RMSD) calculated for electrical resistances obtained in A-A and B-B.
Figure 9Relation between electrical resistance signals obtained with cone and premolar as coupling interfaces: (a) 9.3–9.7 kHz. (b) 11.1–11.5 kHz.