Literature DB >> 30619764

Predicting Gleason Score of Prostate Cancer Patients Using Radiomic Analysis.

Ahmad Chaddad1,2, Tamim Niazi1, Stephan Probst3, Franck Bladou4, Maurice Anidjar4, Boris Bahoric1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Use of quantitative imaging features and encoding the intra-tumoral heterogeneity from multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for the prediction of Gleason score is gaining attention as a non-invasive biomarker for prostate cancer (PCa). This study tested the hypothesis that radiomic features, extracted from mpMRI, could predict the Gleason score pattern of patients with PCa.
Methods: This analysis included T2-weighted (T2-WI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC, computed from diffusion-weighted imaging) scans of 99 PCa patients from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). A total of 41 radiomic features were calculated from a local tumor sub-volume (i.e., regions of interest) that is determined by a centroid coordinate of PCa volume, grouped based on their Gleason score patterns. Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman's rank correlation tests were used to identify features related to Gleason score groups. Random forest (RF) classifier model was used to predict Gleason score groups and identify the most important signature among the 41 radiomic features.
Results: Gleason score groups could be discriminated based on zone size percentage, large zone size emphasis and zone size non-uniformity values (p < 0.05). These features also showed a significant correlation between radiomic features and Gleason score groups with a correlation value of -0.35, 0.32, 0.42 for the large zone size emphasis, zone size non-uniformity and zone size percentage, respectively (corrected p < 0.05). RF classifier model achieved an average of the area under the curves of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) of 83.40, 72.71, and 77.35% to predict Gleason score groups (G1) = 6; 6 < (G2) < (3 + 4) and (G3) ≥ 4 + 3, respectively.
Conclusion: Our results suggest that the radiomic features can be used as a non-invasive biomarker to predict the Gleason score of the PCa patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarkers; classification; gleason score; prostate cancer; radiomics

Year:  2018        PMID: 30619764      PMCID: PMC6305278          DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Oncol        ISSN: 2234-943X            Impact factor:   6.244


  21 in total

1.  Preoperative Prediction of Extracapsular Extension: Radiomics Signature Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Stage Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Shuai Ma; Huihui Xie; Huihui Wang; Jiejin Yang; Chao Han; Xiaoying Wang; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Uncertainty measurement of radiomics features against inherent quantum noise in computed tomography imaging.

Authors:  Shu-Ju Tu; Wei-Yuan Chen; Chen-Te Wu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Radiomic Machine Learning and External Validation Based on 3.0 T mpMRI for Prediction of Intraductal Carcinoma of Prostate With Different Proportion.

Authors:  Ling Yang; Zhengyan Li; Xu Liang; Jingxu Xu; Yusen Cai; Chencui Huang; Mengni Zhang; Jin Yao; Bin Song
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 4.  The role of MRI in prostate cancer: current and future directions.

Authors:  Maria Clara Fernandes; Onur Yildirim; Sungmin Woo; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 5.  Imaging for Target Delineation and Treatment Planning in Radiation Oncology: Current and Emerging Techniques.

Authors:  Sonja Stieb; Brigid McDonald; Mary Gronberg; Grete May Engeseth; Renjie He; Clifton David Fuller
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 3.722

6.  A multi-resolution model for histopathology image classification and localization with multiple instance learning.

Authors:  Jiayun Li; Wenyuan Li; Anthony Sisk; Huihui Ye; W Dean Wallace; William Speier; Corey W Arnold
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.589

7.  Development and head-to-head comparison of machine-learning models to identify patients requiring prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Shuanbao Yu; Jin Tao; Biao Dong; Yafeng Fan; Haopeng Du; Haotian Deng; Jinshan Cui; Guodong Hong; Xuepei Zhang
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  Non-Gaussian models of diffusion weighted imaging for detection and characterization of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  V Brancato; C Cavaliere; M Salvatore; S Monti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Radiomics prediction model for the improved diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer on biparametric MRI.

Authors:  Mengjuan Li; Tong Chen; Wenlu Zhao; Chaogang Wei; Xiaobo Li; Shaofeng Duan; Libiao Ji; Zhihua Lu; Junkang Shen
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-02

10.  Development and validation of a multiparametric MRI-based radiomics signature for distinguishing between indolent and aggressive prostate cancer.

Authors:  Liuhui Zhang; Donggen Jiang; Chujie Chen; Xiangwei Yang; Hanqi Lei; Zhuang Kang; Hai Huang; Jun Pang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.