| Literature DB >> 30619265 |
Matthew K O'Shea1,2,3, Thomas E Fletcher3,4, Julius Muller1, Rachel Tanner1, Magali Matsumiya1, J Wendi Bailey4, Jayne Jones4, Steven G Smith5, Gavin Koh6, William G Horsnell2,7, Nicholas J Beeching4, James Dunbar3,8, Duncan Wilson3, Adam F Cunningham9, Helen McShane1.
Abstract
Soil-transmitted helminths and Mycobacterium tuberculosis frequently coincide geographically and it is hypothesized that gastrointestinal helminth infection may exacerbate tuberculosis (TB) disease by suppression of Th1 and Th17 responses. However, few studies have focused on latent TB infection (LTBI), which predominates globally. We performed a large observational study of healthy adults migrating from Nepal to the UK (n = 645). Individuals were screened for LTBI and gastrointestinal parasite infections. A significant negative association between hookworm and LTBI-positivity was seen (OR = 0.221; p = 0.039). Hookworm infection treatment did not affect LTBI conversions. Blood from individuals with hookworm had a significantly greater ability to control virulent mycobacterial growth in vitro than from those without, which was lost following hookworm treatment. There was a significant negative relationship between mycobacterial growth and eosinophil counts. Eosinophil-associated differential gene expression characterized the whole blood transcriptome of hookworm infection and correlated with improved mycobacterial control. These data provide a potential alternative explanation for the reduced prevalence of LTBI among individuals with hookworm infection, and possibly an anti-mycobacterial role for helminth-induced eosinophils.Entities:
Keywords: LTBI; eosinophil; growth inhibition; hookworm; latent tuberculosis; tuberculosis
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30619265 PMCID: PMC6302045 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02893
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Study schedule.
Age, IGRA and hematological characteristics of the population by LTBI status.
| Age (years) | 19.2 [18.6–19.9] | 19.3 [18.7–20.0] | 0.835 |
| Total leucocytes (x109/L) | 7.8 [6.6–9.6] | 8 [6.7–9.4] | 0.585 |
| Neutrophils (x109/L) | 4.8 [3.6–6.1] | 4.7 [3.7–6.1] | 0.920 |
| Lymphocytes (x109/L) | 1.9 [1.6–2.4] | 2.1 [1.8–2.4] | 0.092 |
| Monocytes (x109/L) | 0.4 [0.4–0.5] | 0.4 [0.4–0.6] | 0.743 |
| Basophils (x109/L) | 0.0 [0.0–0.1] | 0.1 [0.0–0.1] | 0.687 |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | 150 [143–158] | 152 [147–158] | 0.291 |
| Mean cell volume (fL) | 90.0 [87.5–93.6] | 90.1 [87.8–92.4] | 0.323 |
| Platelets (x109/L) | 236 [209–271] | 250 [217–284] | 0.118 |
Mann-whitney U-test; significant differences highlighted in bold.
LTBI, latent TB infection.
IQR, interquartile range.
SFU, spot forming unit.
Prevalence of GI parasite infection and association with IGRA positivity.
| 2 | 1 (1.0) | 1 (0.2) | – | – | – | |
| 6 | 3 (3.0) | 3 (0.6) | – | – | – | |
| 39 | 4 (4.0) | 35 (6.4) | 0.495 | 0.592 (0.21–1.71) | 0.332 | |
| 21 | 2 (2.0) | 19 (3.5) | 0.555 | 0.552 (0.13–2.41) | 0.428 | |
| 54 | 7 (6.9) | 47 (8.7) | 0.697 | 0.778 (0.34–1.77) | 0.550 | |
| Any helminth/protozoan | 169 | 19 (18.6) | 150 (27.6) | 0.066 | 0.6 (0.35–1.02) | 0.06 |
Fisher's two-tailed LTBI+ vs. LTBI-; significant differences highlighted in bold.
Statistical analyses were not performed where total parasite infection number was <10.
LTBI, latent TB infection; OR,odd's ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 2Treatment of hookworm infection does not promote IGRA conversion to positivity. Longitudinal IGRA responses were assessed among individuals with a negative IGRA at baseline (n = 212). IGRA testing was repeated after either no intervention (no GIP infection, n = 110, A,B) or after GIP treatment (any GIP infection, n = 102, C,D). While there were significant increases in some T cell responses to M.tb-specific antigens, there was no significant difference in the conversion rate to IGRA positivity between the groups (E). GIP, gastrointestinal parasite; SFC, spot forming cells; T, time point; Rx, treatment for GIP; gray dashed line, threshold for a positive IGRA; ns, non-significant; *p < 0.05.
Figure 3IgG1 responses to M.tb-specific antigens are significantly different between individuals with LTBI and those with hookworm infection. Antigen-specific IgG1 responses to ESAT-6/CFP-10 in pre-treatment serum samples from uninfected healthy controls (n = 28), and individuals with either LTBI (n = 47) or hookworm infection (n = 13) were determined by ELISA. Optical densities (ODs) are reported following subtraction of the background. Points represent the mean of duplicates and bars are the median values with the interquartile range. After normality testing a Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's correction for multiple comparisons was performed. ns, non-significant; *p < 0.05. LTBI, latent TB infection; HW, hookworm.
Figure 4In vitro differential mycobacterial control is improved among individuals with hookworm infection in whole blood and PBMC and is lost after helminth treatment. Whole blood and PBMC MGIT using M.tb H37Rv was performed to assess mycobacterial control. Whole blood samples were available from uninfected controls (n = 9) and matched pre- and post-treatment samples from hookworm infected individuals (n = 13) (A). The relationship between mycobacterial net growth and hematology parameters was investigated. After testing for normality, Spearman's correlations were calculated between hematology data and all whole blood M.tb H37Rv MGIT results (n = 34) and showed a significant negative correlation growth and eosinophil count (B). MGIA was also performed using cryopreserved PBMC with matched pre- and post-treatment PBMC samples from individuals with hookworm infection (n = 12) and controls (n = 9) (C). For MGIT data, points represent the mean of duplicates; bars represent mean values with SD. A one-way multiple comparison ANOVA with Tukey's post-test correction was performed between the groups. HW, hookworm; Rx, treatment; ns, non-significant; **p < 0.005.
Figure 5A hookworm-specific transcriptional signature comprising 112 significant probes was detected in infected compared to treated and uninfected individuals and adjustment for eosinophil count leads to loss of the hookworm-specific signature. (A). Volcano plot showing magnitude and significance of differential expression between hookworm infected volunteers before and after treatment. Infected volunteers post-treatment were analyzed in combination with a hookworm naïve control group to increase power. Gene names of the top 50 probes with an FDR below 20% are shown above the dashed line. FC, fold-change; HW, hookworm; pre and post refer to treatment. (B). Volcano plot showing the fold changes between hookworm infected volunteers before and after treatment. The linear model contained eosinophil counts as an additive term to adjust for differences in eosinophils. No probe reached significance at 20% FDR. FDR, false discovery rate.
Figure 6Hookworm-specific transcriptional signature is highly correlated to transcriptomic correlates of eosinophil count and is consistent with previously published signatures. (A). Scatterplot of log2 fold changes of hookworm infected vs. post treatment and control samples. A regression line was added to highlight the correlation of the two contrasts and gene names of the top 100 differentially expressed probes were added. Point color indicates the 302 and 112 significantly differentially expressed probes below 20% FDR in hookworm infected and eosinophil counts, respectively. Seventy four probes are significantly differentially expressed in both contrasts. (B). Of the top 50 genes described to be significantly associated with eosinophils based on whole blood gene expression in a recent publication (42), 40 were detected in our study and the gene names of all probes representing these genes are indicated.
Figure 7Unsupervised clustering of the hookworm-specific transcriptional signature reveals correlation to mycobacterial growth inhibition. Normalized expression values of 112 probes mapping to 104 genes were mean centered and scaled and columns were clustered using hierarchical clustering as described in the Materials and Methods. The two largest clusters of patients were colored in red and black and the two most distinct clusters of probes were separated into cluster 1 and cluster 2 by k-means clustering. MGIA control was significantly improved (p < 0.003) in the black cluster compared to the red cluster. A Welch Two Sample t-test was performed between groups. Rx, treatment.