Simon J Brooker1, Birgit Nikolay2, Dina Balabanova3, Rachel L Pullan2. 1. Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Electronic address: simon.brooker@lshtm.ac.uk. 2. Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 3. Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Emphasis is being given to the control of neglected tropical diseases, including the possibility of interrupting the transmission of soil-transmitted helminths (STH). We evaluated the feasibility by country of achieving interruption of the transmission of STH. METHODS: Based on a conceptual framework for the identification of the characteristics of a successful STH control programme, we assembled spatial data for a range of epidemiological, institutional, economic, and political factors. Using four different statistical methods, we developed a composite score of the feasibility of interrupting STH transmission and undertook a sensitivity analysis of the data and methods. FINDINGS: The most important determining factors in the analysis were underlying intensity of STH transmission, current implementation of control programmes for neglected tropical diseases, and whether countries receive large-scale external funding and have strong health systems. The composite scores suggested that interrupting STH transmission is most feasible in countries in the Americas and parts of Asia (eg, Argentina [range of composite feasibility scores, depending on scoring method, 9·4-10·0], Brazil [8·7- 9·7], Chile [8·84-10·0], and Thailand [9·1-10·0]; there was perfect agreement between the four methods), and least feasible in countries in sub-Saharan Africa (eg, Congo [0·4-2·7] and Guinea [2·0-5·6]; there was full agreement between methods), but there were important exceptions to these trends (eg, Ghana [7·4-10·0]; there was agreement between three methods). Agreement was highest between the scores derived with the expert opinion and principal component analysis weighting schemes (Pearson correlation coefficient, r=0·98). The largest disagreement was between benefit-of-the-doubt-derived and principal-component-analysis-derived weighting schemes (r=0·74). INTERPRETATION: The interruption of STH transmission is feasible, especially in countries with low intensity of transmission, supportive household environments, strong health systems, and the availability of suitable delivery platforms and in-country funds, but to achieve local elimination of STH an intersectoral approach to STH control will be needed. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Wellcome Trust.
BACKGROUND: Emphasis is being given to the control of neglected tropical diseases, including the possibility of interrupting the transmission of soil-transmitted helminths (STH). We evaluated the feasibility by country of achieving interruption of the transmission of STH. METHODS: Based on a conceptual framework for the identification of the characteristics of a successful STH control programme, we assembled spatial data for a range of epidemiological, institutional, economic, and political factors. Using four different statistical methods, we developed a composite score of the feasibility of interrupting STH transmission and undertook a sensitivity analysis of the data and methods. FINDINGS: The most important determining factors in the analysis were underlying intensity of STH transmission, current implementation of control programmes for neglected tropical diseases, and whether countries receive large-scale external funding and have strong health systems. The composite scores suggested that interrupting STH transmission is most feasible in countries in the Americas and parts of Asia (eg, Argentina [range of composite feasibility scores, depending on scoring method, 9·4-10·0], Brazil [8·7- 9·7], Chile [8·84-10·0], and Thailand [9·1-10·0]; there was perfect agreement between the four methods), and least feasible in countries in sub-Saharan Africa (eg, Congo [0·4-2·7] and Guinea [2·0-5·6]; there was full agreement between methods), but there were important exceptions to these trends (eg, Ghana [7·4-10·0]; there was agreement between three methods). Agreement was highest between the scores derived with the expert opinion and principal component analysis weighting schemes (Pearson correlation coefficient, r=0·98). The largest disagreement was between benefit-of-the-doubt-derived and principal-component-analysis-derived weighting schemes (r=0·74). INTERPRETATION: The interruption of STH transmission is feasible, especially in countries with low intensity of transmission, supportive household environments, strong health systems, and the availability of suitable delivery platforms and in-country funds, but to achieve local elimination of STH an intersectoral approach to STH control will be needed. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Wellcome Trust.
Authors: Birgit Nikolay; Charles S Mwandawiro; Jimmy H Kihara; Collins Okoyo; Jorge Cano; Mariam T Mwanje; Hadley Sultani; Dorcas Alusala; Hugo C Turner; Caroline Teti; Josh Garn; Matthew C Freeman; Elizabeth Allen; Roy M Anderson; Rachel L Pullan; Sammy M Njenga; Simon J Brooker Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2015-09-30
Authors: Hugo C Turner; James E Truscott; Alison A Bettis; T Déirdre Hollingsworth; Simon J Brooker; Roy M Anderson Journal: Parasite Epidemiol Control Date: 2016-06
Authors: Hugo C Turner; James E Truscott; Alison A Bettis; Kathryn V Shuford; Julia C Dunn; T Déirdre Hollingsworth; Simon J Brooker; Roy M Anderson Journal: Parasit Vectors Date: 2015-11-05 Impact factor: 3.876