| Literature DB >> 30618727 |
Vasiliki I Zilidou1,2, Christos A Frantzidis1, Evangelia D Romanopoulou1, Evangelos Paraskevopoulos1, Styliani Douka2, Panagiotis D Bamidis1.
Abstract
Neuroscience is developing rapidly by providing a variety of modern tools for analyzing the functional interactions of the brain and detection of pathological deviations due to neurodegeneration. The present study argues that the induction of neuroplasticity of the mature human brain leads to the prevention of dementia. Promising solution seems to be the dance programs because they combine cognitive and physical activity in a pleasant way. So, we investigated whether the traditional Greek dances can improve the cognitive, physical and functional status of the elderly always aiming at promoting active and healthy aging. Forty-four participants were randomly assigned equally to the training group and an active control group. The duration of the program was 6 months. Also, the participants were evaluated for their physical status and through an electroencephalographic (EEG) examination at rest (eyes-closed condition). The EEG testing was performed 1-14 days before (pre) and after (post) the training. Cortical network analysis was applied by modeling the cortex through a generic anatomical model of 20,000 fixed dipoles. These were grouped into 512 cortical regions of interest (ROIs). High quality, artifact-free data resulting from an elaborate pre-processing pipeline were segmented into multiple, 30 s of continuous epochs. Then, functional connectivity among those ROIs was performed for each epoch through the relative wavelet entropy (RWE). Synchronization matrices were computed and then thresholded in order to provide binary, directed cortical networks of various density ranges. The results showed that the dance training improved optimal network performance as estimated by the small-world property. Further analysis demonstrated that there were also local network changes resulting in better information flow and functional re-organization of the network nodes. These results indicate the application of the dance training as a possible non-pharmacological intervention for promoting mental and physical well-being of senior citizens. Our results were also compared with a combination of computerized cognitive and physical training, which has already been demonstrated to induce neuroplasticity (LLM Care).Entities:
Keywords: active aging; brain networks; dancing; dementia; electroencephalography; functional connectivity; neurodegeneration; neuroplasticity
Year: 2018 PMID: 30618727 PMCID: PMC6308125 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00422
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.750
Number of participants per intervention group, age, education, Body Mass Index (BMI) and cognitive status as measured by the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Trail B and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS).
| Active group | Dance group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
| Age (years) | 66 | 5.51 | 68.73 | 4.73 | 0.091 |
| Education (years) | 8.64 | 3.79 | 9.55 | 4.63 | 0.481 |
| % Female | 77.3 | 95.5 | |||
| BMI | 30.14 | 2.92 | 29.10 | 4.90 | 0.408 |
| MMSE | 26.73 | 2.88 | 27.05 | 2.75 | 0.710 |
| Trail B | 146.30 | 51.99 | 194.11 | 82.33 | 0.036 |
| GDS | 2.76 | 3.0 | 2.00 | 2.6 | 0.427 |
Figure 1Visualization of the electroencephalographic (EEG) methodology from transforming the raw EEG data (1) to the cortical activity (2), estimation of regions of interest (ROIs) cortical activity (3), quantification of functional connectivity matrix (4) and finally cortical brain network analysis (5) through graph theory (6).
Figure 2Visualization of the analysis performed for estimating the proper sample size for the proposed statistical analysis. The power analysis indicated that the proper sample size was 48 (24 participants per group), whereas we have included 44 senior citizens (22 participant per group).
2 × 2 mixed model ANOVA statistical analysis.
| Variables | Edges | Time/Interv. | Between intervention | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Small world value | 10,000 | 20,565 | ||
| 12,500 | 19,530 | 0.19 | ||
| Characteristic path | 15,000 | 5,163 |
The groups of intervention (Dance and Active) served as between-subjects factor whereas the time (pre-post) as within-subject factor and the three inter-related dependent variables were the small-world value, cluster coefficient and characteristic path length. The p-values that reached statistical significance (.
Statistically significant changes of each group regarding the Fullerton examination.
| TEST | Subdomain | Active group ( | Dance group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fullerton | Chair stand | −3.700 | −3.926 | ||
| Arm Curl | −1.407 | 0.175 | −1.588 | 0.127 | |
| 2-min walk in place | 0.541 | 0.595 | −0.606 | 0.551 | |
| Chair sit and reach | −1.494 | 0.151 | −3.023 | ||
| Back scratch | −0.583 | 0.567 | −1.648 | 0.114 | |
| 8-Foot-Up-and-Go | 1.303 | 0.207 | 3.925 | ||
Bold values denote statistical significance.
Statistically significant changes regarding local network (betweenness centrality, participation coefficient, within-module z-score) at pre-post level for both groups.
| Network | Features | Time/Interv. | Between intervention | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Executive | Betweenness centrality (BC) | 23.246 | 0.164 | |
| Participation coefficient (PC) | 0.219 | 0.642 | 0.079 | |
| Within module z-score (ZM) | 37.262 | 0.695 | ||
| Fronto-parietal | Betweenness centrality (BC) | 9.291 | 0.364 | |
| Participation coefficient (PC) | 25.695 | 0.490 | ||
| Within module z-score (ZM) | 22.284 | 0.494 | ||
| Default mode network (DMN) | Betweenness centrality (BC) | 0.860 | 0.359 | 0.068 |
| Participation coefficient (PC) | 7.740 | |||
| Within module z-score (ZM) | 1.450 | 0.235 | 0.417 | |
| Contribution of all | Betweenness centrality (BC) | 1.926 | 0.172 | |
| Participation coefficient (PC) | 11.069 | |||
| Within module z-score (ZM) | 3.286 | 0.077 | 0.180 |
The p-values that reached statistical significance (.
Figure 3Visualization of the hub significance of each node in terms of betweenness centrality (BC). The first column (from the left) displays a sagittal view of the cortex, the middle one an axial view and the right one a coronal view. Rows 1–2 are for the active control group for pre and post conditions respectively. Rows 3–4 are for the Dance group. The right plot denotes the pre-post differences in the hub strength for the active (upper plot) and for the dance (lower plot).
Figure 4Visualization of the functional cartography in terms of participation coefficient (PC; horizontal axis) and within-module z-score (vertical axis). The DANCE group is denoted with asterisk and the ACTIVE group with circle. The pre-intervention is denoted with blue color and the post condition with red color.
Figure 5Visualization of the Pearson correlation among nodes’ roles. Positive correlations are denoted with blue color and negative correlations with red color. The circle’s size is proportional to the strength of the statistical significance.