| Literature DB >> 30616629 |
Christopher P Walker1, Andre L S Pessoa2,3, Thalita Figueiredo4, Megan Rafferty5, Uirá S Melo4, Paulo R Nóbrega6, Nicholas Murphy5, Fernando Kok4, Mayana Zatz4, Silvana Santos7, Raymond Y Cho5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dysregulation of the inositol cycle is implicated in a wide variety of human diseases, including developmental defects and neurological diseases. A homozygous frameshift mutation in IMPA1, coding for the enzyme inositol monophosphatase 1 (IMPase), has recently been associated with severe intellectual disability (ID) in a geographically isolated consanguineous family in Northeastern Brazil (Figueredo et al., 2016). However, the neurophysiologic mechanisms that mediate the IMPA1 mutation and associated ID phenotype have not been characterized. To this end, resting EEG (eyes-open and eyes-closed) was collected from the Figueredo et al. pedigree. Quantitative EEG measures, including mean power, dominant frequency and dominant frequency variability, were investigated for allelic associations using multivariate family-based association test using generalized estimating equations.Entities:
Keywords: EEG; Electroencephalography; IMPA1; Inosotol monophosphatase; Oscillations
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30616629 PMCID: PMC6322245 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-018-0977-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis ISSN: 1750-1172 Impact factor: 4.123
Subject demographics
| IMPA1 Mutation |
| Female | Male | Psychosis | Age (SD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOM+/+ | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 51.5 (5.3) |
| HET+/− | 9 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 44.8 (12.6) |
| WT−/− | 17 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 45.0 (12.4) |
FBAT-GEE for eyes-open condition
| Allele | Freq. | Df | Recessive | Additive | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| χ2 |
| χ2 |
| ||||
| Mean band power | |||||||
| Delta | 1 | 0.836 | 8 | 9.220 | 0.3241 | – | – |
| 2 | 0.164 | 8 | 11.235 | 0.1888 | 11.426 | 0.1787 | |
| Theta | 1 | 0.836 | 8 | 18.451 | 0.0181* | – | – |
| 2 | 0.164 | 8 | 11.220 | 0.1895 | 16.388 | 0.0372* | |
| Alpha | 1 | 0.836 | 8 | 13.891 | 0.0847 | – | – |
| 2 | 0.164 | 8 | 8.957 | 0.3459 | 14.097 | 0.0793 | |
| Beta | 1 | 0.836 | 8 | 11.385 | 0.1808 | – | – |
| 2 | 0.164 | 8 | 11.364 | 0.1819 | 10.728 | 0.2176 | |
| Gamma 1 | 1 | 0.836 | 8 | 7.371 | 0.4972 | – | – |
| 2 | 0.164 | 8 | 10.567 | 0.2275 | 9.196 | 0.3261 | |
| Gamma 2 | 1 | 0.836 | 8 | 8.811 | 0.3585 | – | – |
| 2 | 0.164 | 8 | 11.431 | 0.1785 | 12.598 | 0.1265 | |
| Dominant frequency variability | |||||||
| Delta | 1 | 0.836 | 8 | 5.703 | 0.6805 | – | – |
| 2 | 0.164 | 8 | 11.948 | 0.1535 | 10.175 | 0.2530 | |
| Theta | 1 | 0.836 | 8 | 11.101 | 0.1961 | – | – |
| 2 | 0.164 | 8 | 9.636 | 0.2915 | 12.961 | 0.1132 | |
| Alpha | 1 | 0.836 | 8 | 19.771 | 0.0112* | – | – |
| 2 | 0.164 | 8 | 5.415 | 0.7124 | 11.427 | 0.1786 | |
| Beta | 1 | 0.836 | 8 | 5.137 | 0.7428 | – | – |
| 2 | 0.164 | 8 | 5.788 | 0.6710 | 6.108 | 0.6351 | |
| Gamma 1 | 1 | 0.836 | 8 | 8.782 | 0.3610 | – | – |
| 2 | 0.164 | 8 | 5.718 | 0.6788 | 8.791 | 0.3603 | |
| Gamma 2 | 1 | 0.836 | 8 | 12.742 | 0.1210 | – | – |
| 2 | 0.164 | 8 | 1.749 | 0.9878 | 7.530 | 0.4806 | |
FBAT-GEE for eyes-closed condition
| Allele | Freq. | Df | Recessive | Additive | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| χ2 |
| χ2 |
| ||||
| Mean band power | |||||||
| Delta | 1 | 0.836 | 8 | 7.534 | 0.4802 | – | – |
| 2 | 0.164 | 8 | 5.859 | 0.6630 | 8.326 | 0.4023 | |
| Theta | 1 | 0.836 | 8 | 15.366 | 0.0524 | – | – |
| 2 | 0.164 | 8 | 9.769 | 0.2816 | 14.265 | 0.0751 | |
| Alpha | 1 | 0.836 | 8 | 10.257 | 0.2474 | – | – |
| 2 | 0.164 | 8 | 10.917 | 0.2065 | 14.115 | 0.0788 | |
| Beta | 1 | 0.836 | 8 | 11.398 | 0.1802 | – | – |
| 2 | 0.164 | 8 | 6.49 | 0.5925 | 10.214 | 0.2503 | |
| Gamma 1 | 1 | 0.836 | 8 | 8.878 | 0.3527 | – | – |
| 2 | 0.164 | 8 | 8.486 | 0.3875 | 11.915 | 0.1550 | |
| Gamma 2 | 1 | 0.836 | 8 | 5.378 | 0.7165 | – | – |
| 2 | 0.164 | 8 | 7.796 | 0.4537 | 7.854 | 0.4478 | |
| Dominant frequency variability | |||||||
| Delta | 1 | 0.836 | 8 | 9.147 | 0.3301 | – | – |
| 2 | 0.164 | 8 | 8.009 | 0.4326 | 12.291 | 0.1387 | |
| Theta | 1 | 0.836 | 8 | 15.848 | 0.0446* | – | – |
| 2 | 0.164 | 8 | 10.01 | 0.2644 | 13.985 | 0.0822 | |
| Alpha | 1 | 0.836 | 8 | 15.264 | 0.0542 | – | – |
| 2 | 0.164 | 8 | 8.499 | 0.3863 | 14.543 | 0.0687 | |
| Beta | 1 | 0.836 | 8 | 8.618 | 0.3756 | – | – |
| 2 | 0.164 | 8 | 9.717 | 0.2855 | 12.228 | 0.1413 | |
| Gamma 1 | 1 | 0.836 | 8 | 9.717 | 0.2855 | – | – |
| 2 | 0.164 | 8 | 8.698 | 0.3684 | 12.144 | 0.1449 | |
| Gamma 2 | 1 | 0.836 | 8 | 6.865 | 0.5513 | – | – |
| 2 | 0.164 | 8 | 9.659 | 0.2898 | 10.571 | 0.2272 | |
Fig. 1Mean (± SEM) theta-band power by scalp region and genotype for eyes open and eyes closed conditions. (BLUE = WT, TEAL = HET, YELLOW=HOM). Arrows indicate the direction of significant associations between theta-band power and specific IMPA1 alleles under the recessive FBAT model. Arrows on the left of a graph indicate an association with the wild-type allele within a specific region. Arrows on the right of the graph indicate an association with the mutant allele within a specific region. a In the eyes open condition, significantly lower left frontal theta power was associated with the mutant allele, and significantly greater right frontal theta power was associated with the wild-type allele. The right frontal pattern was also present under the additive FBAT model. b In the eyes closed condition, these differences were not observed. This lateral shift in theta-band power representations on the scalp suggests subtle anatomical or network-level differences may arise during development in the presence of the IMPA1 mutation
Fig. 2Mean (± SEM) dominant frequency variability by scalp region and phenotype. (BLUE = WT, TEAL = HET, YELLOW=HOM). Arrows indicate the direction of significant associations between theta-band power and specific IMPA1 alleles under the recessive FBAT model. Arrows on the left of a graph indicate an association with the wild-type allele within a specific region. Arrows on the right of the graph indicate an association with the mutant allele within a specific region. a No significant associations were observed for theta-band variability in the eyes open condition. b In the eyes closed condition, the mutant allele was associated with a significantly higher central theta variability, and the wild-type allele was associated with significantly lower parietal theta variability. These patterns supplement the power results suggesting a core theta-band oscillatory disturbance resulting from the IMPA1 mutation. c Eyes open and d eyes closed alpha-band variability did not show any regional associations with specific alleles; however, multivariate-FBAT analyses found significant associations between the wild-type allele and alpha variability in the eyes open condition suggesting a more global phenomenon