Literature DB >> 3061451

Ribosomal binding and dipeptide formation by misacylated tRNA(Phe),S.

T G Heckler1, J R Roesser, C Xu, P I Chang, S M Hecht.   

Abstract

Eight structurally modified peptidyl-tRNA(Phe),s were employed to study P-site binding and peptide bond formation in a cell-free system involving Escherichia coli ribosomes programmed with poly(uridylic acid). It was found that the two analogues (N-acetyl-D-phenylalanyl-tRNA(Phe) and N-acetyl-D-tyrosyl-tRNA(Phe] containing D-amino acids functioned poorly as donors in the peptidyltransferase reaction and that two N-acetyl-L-phenylalanyl-tRNA(Phe)'s differing from the prototype substrate in that they contained 2'- or 3'-deoxyadenosine at the 3'-terminus failed to form dipeptide at all when L-phenylalanyl-tRNA(Phe) was the acceptor tRNA. Interestingly, all four of these peptidyl-tRNA's bound to ribosomes to about the same extent as tRNA's that functioned normally as donors in the peptidyltransferase reaction, at least in the absence of competing peptidyl-tRNA species. Two peptidyl-tRNA's lacking an amino group were also tested. In comparison with N-acetyl-L-phenylalanyl-tRNA(Phe) it was found that trans-cinnamyl-tRNA(Phe) and 3-phenylpropionyl-tRNA(Phe)'s formed dipeptides to the extent of 53 and 80%, respectively, when L-phenylalanyl-tRNA(Phe)was used as the acceptor tRNA. N-Acetyl-beta-phenylalanyl-tRNA(Phe) was found to be the most efficient donor substrate studied. Both isomers transferred N-acetyl-beta-phenylalanine to L-phenylalanyl-tRNA(Phe); the nature of the dipeptides formed in each case was verified by HPLC in comparison with authentic synthetic samples. Further, the rate and extent of peptide bond formation in each case exceeded that observed with the control tRNA, N-acetyl-L-phenylalanyl-tRNA(Phe).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3061451     DOI: 10.1021/bi00419a012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  7 in total

Review 1.  Origin and evolution of the ribosome.

Authors:  George E Fox
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  In vitro suppression as a tool for the investigation of translation initiation.

Authors:  V A Karginov; S V Mamaev; S M Hecht
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Expanding the Scope of Protein Synthesis Using Modified Ribosomes.

Authors:  Larisa M Dedkova; Sidney M Hecht
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 4.  The chemical biology of protein phosphorylation.

Authors:  Mary Katherine Tarrant; Philip A Cole
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 23.643

5.  Mechanistic studies of non-canonical amino acid mutagenesis.

Authors:  Rachel C Fleisher; Nina Michael; Ruben L Gonzalez
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 1.682

6.  An expanded set of amino acid analogs for the ribosomal translation of unnatural peptides.

Authors:  Matthew C T Hartman; Kristopher Josephson; Chi-Wang Lin; Jack W Szostak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Protein Synthesis with Ribosomes Selected for the Incorporation of β-Amino Acids.

Authors:  Rumit Maini; Sandipan Roy Chowdhury; Larisa M Dedkova; Basab Roy; Sasha M Daskalova; Rakesh Paul; Shengxi Chen; Sidney M Hecht
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 3.162

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.