Literature DB >> 30612522

A multi-locus predictiveness curve and its summary assessment for genetic risk prediction.

Changshuai Wei1, Ming Li2, Yalu Wen3, Chengyin Ye4, Qing Lu5.   

Abstract

Genetic association studies using high-throughput genotyping and sequencing technologies have identified a large number of genetic variants associated with complex human diseases. These findings have provided an unprecedented opportunity to identify individuals in the population at high risk for disease who carry causal genetic mutations and hold great promise for early intervention and individualized medicine. While interest is high in building risk prediction models based on recent genetic findings, it is crucial to have appropriate statistical measurements to assess the performance of a genetic risk prediction model. Predictiveness curves were recently proposed as a graphic tool for evaluating a risk prediction model on the basis of a single continuous biomarker. The curve evaluates a risk prediction model for classification performance as well as its usefulness when applied to a population. In this article, we extend the predictiveness curve to measure the collective contribution of multiple genetic variants. We further propose a nonparametric, U-statistics-based measurement, referred to as the U-Index, to quantify the performance of a multi-locus predictiveness curve. In particular, a global U-Index and a partial U-Index can be used in the general population and a subpopulation of particular clinical interest, respectively. Through simulation studies, we demonstrate that the proposed U-Index has advantages over several existing summary statistics under various disease models. We also show that the partial U-Index can have its own uniqueness when rare variants have a substantial contribution to disease risk. Finally, we use the proposed predictiveness curve and its corresponding U-Index to evaluate the performance of a genetic risk prediction model for nicotine dependence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  High-dimensional data; U-statistics; genetic risk prediction; nicotine dependence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30612522      PMCID: PMC6612460          DOI: 10.1177/0962280218819202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  19 in total

Review 1.  Sensitivity and specificity should be de-emphasized in diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Karel G M Moons; Frank E Harrell
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 2.  A meta-analysis of estimated genetic and environmental effects on smoking behavior in male and female adult twins.

Authors:  Ming D Li; Rong Cheng; Jennie Z Ma; Gary E Swan
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  Assessing risk prediction models in case-control studies using semiparametric and nonparametric methods.

Authors:  Ying Huang; Margaret Sullivan Pepe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  On criteria for evaluating models of absolute risk.

Authors:  Mitchell H Gail; Ruth M Pfeiffer
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Nonparametric tests of association of multiple genes with human disease.

Authors:  Daniel J Schaid; Shannon K McDonnell; Scott J Hebbring; Julie M Cunningham; Stephen N Thibodeau
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Explained variation for logistic regression.

Authors:  M Mittlböck; M Schemper
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  A powerful nonparametric statistical framework for family-based association analyses.

Authors:  Ming Li; Zihuai He; Daniel J Schaid; Mario A Cleves; Todd G Nick; Qing Lu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Detecting genetic interactions for quantitative traits with U-statistics.

Authors:  Ming Li; Chengyin Ye; Wenjiang Fu; Robert C Elston; Qing Lu
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.135

9.  The evaluation of clinical predictions. A method and initial application.

Authors:  A R Shapiro
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1977-06-30       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.