Literature DB >> 30611565

Surgical resection of neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases as part of multimodal treatment strategies: A propensity score matching analysis.

Teresa Schreckenbach1, Helga Hübert2, Christine Koch3, Jörg Bojunga3, Andreas A Schnitzbauer2, Wolf O Bechstein2, Katharina Holzer4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether liver resection as part of multimodal therapy of neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) is superior to non-surgical (interventional and medication-based) treatment alone. This study should determine if patients with NELM undergoing hepatic surgery in addition to non-surgical treatment have improved overall survival compared to patients undergoing non-surgical therapy alone.
METHODS: 123 patients undergoing treatment of NELM between 1995 and 2014 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Two groups were formed: (A) surgery and non-surgical therapy and (B) non-surgical treatment alone. To minimize the bias of patient selection propensity score matching was used.
RESULTS: There was significantly better overall survival for group A (152 months, 95%CI: 119-185) compared to group B (63 months, 95%CI: 45-81) measured from the initial diagnosis of the metastases (P = 0.003). After propensity score matching, 37 patients undergoing surgical resection of NELM within a multimodal treatment were compared to 37 patients undergoing non-surgical treatment. Under these circumstances, surgery had no significant influence on survival (group A: 134 months, 95% CI: 94-173; group B: 76 months, 95% CI: 53-99, P = 0.23). Based on a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, only Ki-67 of primary tumor >20% (HR, 50.776; 95%CI, 4.056-635.71; P = 0.002) and no resection of primary tumor (HR, 10.464; 95%CI, 1.873-58.448; P = 0.007) remained independent risk factors.
CONCLUSION: After minimizing patient selection bias, patients with hepatic resection as integral of multimodal therapy of NELM do not have better overall survival than those receiving non-surgical treatment alone.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Liver metastasis; Liver surgery; Neuroendocrine tumor; Surgical oncology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30611565     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.12.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  3 in total

1.  Prognostic value of the 2017 World Health Organization Classification System for gastric neuroendocrine tumors: A single-center experience.

Authors:  Yusuf Karakaş; Şahin Laçin; Olcay Kurtulan; Ece Esin; Veli Sunar; Cenk Sökmensüer; Saadettin Kılıçkap; Şuayib Yalçin
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.852

2.  Effects of tumor origins and therapeutic options on the prognosis of hepatic neuroendocrine tumors: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Jiao; Wenqing Luan; Xiaoqian Peng; Lu Liu; Lianfeng Zhang; Lin Zhou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Is Long-Term Survival in Metastases from Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Improved by Liver Resection?

Authors:  Alin Kraft; Adina Croitoru; Cosmin Moldovan; Ioana Lupescu; Dana Tomescu; Raluca Purnichescu-Purtan; Vlad Herlea; Irinel Popescu; Florin Botea
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.