Literature DB >> 32141816

Prognostic value of the 2017 World Health Organization Classification System for gastric neuroendocrine tumors: A single-center experience.

Yusuf Karakaş1, Şahin Laçin2, Olcay Kurtulan3, Ece Esin4, Veli Sunar5, Cenk Sökmensüer3, Saadettin Kılıçkap6, Şuayib Yalçin6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Gastric neuroendocrine tumors (G-NETs) are rare tumors, but their incidence is gradually increasing. Despite the existence of many classification systems, determining prognosis and planning treatment in patients with G-NETs remains a clinical challenge. In this study, the prognostic value of the World Health Organization (WHO) 2017 grading system and the effect of surgery on survival in low grade neuroendocrine tumors were investigated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: G-NETs who were diagnosed between January 2000 and May 2017 were included in the study. Patients' demographic characteristics, treatment details, and survival data were obtained from medical charts. Pathological samples were re-classified according to the WHO 2017 grading system.
RESULTS: Of the total 94 evaluated patients, 50 (53.2%) were classified with G1 NETs, 37(39.4%) with G2 NETs, 4(4.2%) with well-differentiated G3 NETs, and the remaining 3 patients with poorly differentiated G3 neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). The median follow-up time was 83.2 months. There was a statistically significant difference in 5-year progression free survival (PFS) between G1 tumors (100%) and G2 tumors (76%) (p<0.001). However, there was no statistically significant deference in 5-year overall survival rate (OS) for G1 (97%) and G2 (82%) tumors (p=0.141). When G2 and G1 NETs were compared according to their surgical approach, radical surgery was more frequently performed in patients with G2 tumors (p<0.001). However, radical surgery did not improve PFS in G1 and G2 NETs.
CONCLUSION: The WHO 2017 NET classification system may have low prognostic value for determining the prognosis of patients with G1 and G2 tumors. Radical surgery for G1 and G2 NETs did not improve PFS in our study.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32141816      PMCID: PMC7062132          DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2020.18919

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1300-4948            Impact factor:   1.852


  37 in total

1.  Neuroendocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumours: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  K Oberg; G Akerström; G Rindi; S Jelic
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Clinical impact of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in the management of patients with neuroendocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumors.

Authors:  R Lebtahi; G Cadiot; L Sarda; D Daou; M Faraggi; Y Petegnief; M Mignon; D le Guludec
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  Interventional treatment of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours.

Authors:  H Ahlman; B Wängberg; S Jansson; S Friman; M Olausson; U Tylén; O Nilsson
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.216

4.  Regression of type II gastric carcinoids in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome after surgical excision of all gastrinomas.

Authors:  Melanie L Richards; Paul Gauger; Norman W Thompson; Thomas J Giordano
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-06-16       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Prospective, Randomized Study on the Effect of Octreotide LAR in the Control of Tumor Growth in Patients with Metastatic Neuroendocrine Midgut Tumors (PROMID): Results of Long-Term Survival.

Authors:  Anja Rinke; Michael Wittenberg; Carmen Schade-Brittinger; Behnaz Aminossadati; Erdmuthe Ronicke; Thomas M Gress; Hans-Helge Müller; Rudolf Arnold
Journal:  Neuroendocrinology       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 4.914

Review 6.  Review article: the investigation and management of gastric neuroendocrine tumours.

Authors:  R Basuroy; R Srirajaskanthan; A Prachalias; A Quaglia; J K Ramage
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 8.171

7.  Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy with 111In-pentetreotide in non-functioning gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Orazio Schillaci; Angela Spanu; Francesco Scopinaro; Antonio Falchi; Vito Corleto; Roberta Danieli; Pietro Marongiu; Nicola Pisu; Giordano Madeddu; Gianfranco Delle Fave; Giuseppe Madeddu
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.650

8.  Clinicopathological, treatment, and prognosis study of 43 gastric neuroendocrine carcinomas.

Authors:  De-Jun Liu; Xue-Liang Fu; Wei Liu; Lu-Ying Zheng; Jun-Feng Zhang; Yan-Miao Huo; Jiao Li; Rong Hua; Qiang Liu; Yong-Wei Sun
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Surgery or observation?

Authors:  Yehonatan Bar-Moshe; Haggi Mazeh; Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-04-16

10.  Differing Clinical Courses and Prognoses in Patients With Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumors Based on the 2010-WHO Classification Scheme.

Authors:  Beom Su Kim; Young Soo Park; Jeong Hwan Yook; Sung Tae Oh; Byung-Sik Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.