Michael S Scheeringa1. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The ability to reliably detect posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms that require treatment in young children through screening efforts is a critical step toward providing appropriate treatment. The developmental differences in this age group compared to older youths pose challenges for accurate detection. A brief age-appropriate screen has not yet been quantitatively validated. This study aimed to address that gap by creating a rapid and brief screen based on empirical data that focused on sensitivity and face validity for children aged 3 to 6 years. METHODS: A trauma-exposed group (N = 284) and a non-trauma-exposed group (N = 46), aged 3 to 6 years, were assessed using a semistructured diagnostic interview with their primary caregivers. RESULTS: One hundred twenty combinations of items were evaluated for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, associations with functional impairment, and frequency of false positives. Many combinations of items performed well on these psychometrics, and the final selection of a 6-item screener was influenced by considerations of face validity so that the screen would best reflect the unique symptoms of PTSD. CONCLUSION: The screener proposed is a promising tool that will benefit from additional research to examine its psychometric properties as a stand-alone PTSD screen. Future research ought to include test-retest reliability and replication of these findings in other samples and settings. Eventual uses of a brief screen for PTSD in young children include screening during primary care visits and large-scale screening efforts following disasters, for which cost and time need to be considered.
OBJECTIVE: The ability to reliably detect posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms that require treatment in young children through screening efforts is a critical step toward providing appropriate treatment. The developmental differences in this age group compared to older youths pose challenges for accurate detection. A brief age-appropriate screen has not yet been quantitatively validated. This study aimed to address that gap by creating a rapid and brief screen based on empirical data that focused on sensitivity and face validity for children aged 3 to 6 years. METHODS: A trauma-exposed group (N = 284) and a non-trauma-exposed group (N = 46), aged 3 to 6 years, were assessed using a semistructured diagnostic interview with their primary caregivers. RESULTS: One hundred twenty combinations of items were evaluated for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, associations with functional impairment, and frequency of false positives. Many combinations of items performed well on these psychometrics, and the final selection of a 6-item screener was influenced by considerations of face validity so that the screen would best reflect the unique symptoms of PTSD. CONCLUSION: The screener proposed is a promising tool that will benefit from additional research to examine its psychometric properties as a stand-alone PTSD screen. Future research ought to include test-retest reliability and replication of these findings in other samples and settings. Eventual uses of a brief screen for PTSD in young children include screening during primary care visits and large-scale screening efforts following disasters, for which cost and time need to be considered.
Authors: Chris R Brewin; Suzanna Rose; Bernice Andrews; John Green; Philip Tata; Chris McEvedy; Stuart Turner; Edna B Foa Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: M B Stein; P P Roy-Byrne; J R McQuaid; C Laffaye; J Russo; M E McCahill; W Katon; M Craske; A Bystritsky; C D Sherbourne Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 1999 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Helen Link Egger; Alaattin Erkanli; Gordon Keeler; Edward Potts; Barbara Keith Walter; Adrian Angold Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Judith A Cohen; Esther Deblinger; Anthony P Mannarino; Robert A Steer Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 8.829