Antonio Brillantino1, Francesca Iacobellis2, Alfonso Reginelli3, Luigi Monaco4, Biagio Sodano5, Giuseppe Tufano5, Antonio Tufano5, Mauro Maglio1, Maurizio De Palma1, Natale Di Martino6, Adolfo Renzi7, Roberto Grassi3. 1. Department of Surgery, "A. Cardarelli" Hospital, Via A. Cardarelli 9, 80131, Naples, Italy. 2. Department of Radiology, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy. iacobellisf@gmail.com. 3. Department of Radiology, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy. 4. Department of Surgery, "Villa Esther" Hospital, Via Due Principati 169, 83100, Avellino, Italy. 5. Department of Surgery, "Pellegrini" Hospital, ASL NA1 Centro, via Portamedina alla Pignasecca 41, 80134, Naples, Italy. 6. Department of Surgery, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy. 7. "Villa delle Querce" Hospital, Via Battistello Caracciolo 48, 80136, Naples, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of tridimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) and magnetic resonance (MR) in the preoperative assessment of both simple and complex anorectal fistulas. METHODS: All the patients referred for the treatment of anal fistulas were enrolled in this study and underwent, as preoperative assessment, anamnestic evaluation, clinical examination, and unenhanced and H2O2-enhanced 3D-EAUS and MR. The results of imaging evaluation were compared with surgical findings, considered as reference standard. RESULTS: During the study period, 124 patients operated on for anal fistulas underwent complete preoperative imaging assessment. Perfect agreement between 3D-EAUS and surgery in the anal fistulas' severity grading was found (K = 1). The fistulas were classified as simple in 68/126 (53.9%) and complex in 58/126 (46.03%) cases, according to fistulas' Parks' classification and the most recent American Guidelines. In both simple and complex anal fistulas, 3D-EAUS did not show a significantly higher accuracy in the evaluation of internal openings, if compared with MR (P = 0.47; McNemar's Chi-square test). In the complex anal fistulas, MR showed a significantly higher accuracy in the evaluation of secondary extensions if compared with 3D-EAUS (P = 0.041; McNemar's Chi-square test), whereas in the simple anal fistulas, no significant difference was found. CONCLUSION: In the preoperative work-up of patients with anorectal fistulas, 3D-EAUS may represent the first-line diagnostic tool. In cases of fistulas classified as complex by 3D-EAUS, MR may be indicated as adjunctive diagnostic imaging examination, to more carefully describe the fistulas' complete anatomy.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of tridimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) and magnetic resonance (MR) in the preoperative assessment of both simple and complex anorectal fistulas. METHODS: All the patients referred for the treatment of anal fistulas were enrolled in this study and underwent, as preoperative assessment, anamnestic evaluation, clinical examination, and unenhanced and H2O2-enhanced 3D-EAUS and MR. The results of imaging evaluation were compared with surgical findings, considered as reference standard. RESULTS: During the study period, 124 patients operated on for anal fistulas underwent complete preoperative imaging assessment. Perfect agreement between 3D-EAUS and surgery in the anal fistulas' severity grading was found (K = 1). The fistulas were classified as simple in 68/126 (53.9%) and complex in 58/126 (46.03%) cases, according to fistulas' Parks' classification and the most recent American Guidelines. In both simple and complex anal fistulas, 3D-EAUS did not show a significantly higher accuracy in the evaluation of internal openings, if compared with MR (P = 0.47; McNemar's Chi-square test). In the complex anal fistulas, MR showed a significantly higher accuracy in the evaluation of secondary extensions if compared with 3D-EAUS (P = 0.041; McNemar's Chi-square test), whereas in the simple anal fistulas, no significant difference was found. CONCLUSION: In the preoperative work-up of patients with anorectal fistulas, 3D-EAUS may represent the first-line diagnostic tool. In cases of fistulas classified as complex by 3D-EAUS, MR may be indicated as adjunctive diagnostic imaging examination, to more carefully describe the fistulas' complete anatomy.
Authors: R L West; D D E Zimmerman; S Dwarkasing; S M Hussain; W C J Hop; W R Schouten; E J Kuipers; R J F Felt-Bersma Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: J G Williams; P A Farrands; A B Williams; B A Taylor; P J Lunniss; P M Sagar; J S Varma; B D George Journal: Colorectal Dis Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 3.788
Authors: R G Beets-Tan; G L Beets; A G van der Hoop; A G Kessels; R F Vliegen; C G Baeten; J M van Engelshoven Journal: Radiology Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Gordon N Buchanan; Steve Halligan; Clive I Bartram; Andrew B Williams; Danilo Tarroni; C Richard G Cohen Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-10-21 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Francesca Iacobellis; Donatella Narese; Daniela Berritto; Antonio Brillantino; Marco Di Serafino; Susanna Guerrini; Roberta Grassi; Mariano Scaglione; Maria Antonietta Mazzei; Luigia Romano Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2021-05-30