Literature DB >> 30607806

Monitoring of pulse pressure variation using a new smartphone application (Capstesia) versus stroke volume variation using an uncalibrated pulse wave analysis monitor: a clinical decision making study during major abdominal surgery.

Alexandre Joosten1,2, Alexandra Jacobs3, Olivier Desebbe4, Jean-Louis Vincent5, Saxena Sarah3, Joseph Rinehart6, Luc Van Obbergh3, Alexander Hapfelmeier7, Bernd Saugel8.   

Abstract

Pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) can be used to assess fluid status in the operating room but usually require dedicated advanced hemodynamic monitors. Recently, a smartphone application (Capstesia™), which automatically calculates PPV from a picture of the invasive arterial pressure waveform from any monitor screen (PPVCAP), has been developed. The purpose of this study was to compare PPVCAP with SVV from an uncalibrated pulse wave analysis monitor (SVVPC). In 40 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, we compared PPVCAP with SVVPC at post-induction, pre-incision, post-incision, end of surgery, and during every hypotensive episode (mean arterial pressure < 65 mmHg). We classified PPVCAP and SVVPC into three categories reflecting the thresholds used for the decision to administer fluids: no fluid administration (PPV and SVV < 9%), gray zone (PPV and SVV 9-13%), and fluid administration (PPV and SVV > 13%). The agreement between SVVPC and PPVCAP for these three categories was measured by the number of concordant paired measurements divided by the total number of paired measurements and Cohen's kappa coefficient. In the 549 pairs of PPV-SVV data obtained, the overall agreement of PPVCAP with SVVPC was 79%, and the kappa coefficient was moderate (0.55). The highest agreement and kappa coefficient value were observed after the induction of anesthesia before surgical incision. PPVCAP and SVVPC would have resulted in completely opposite clinical decisions regarding fluid administration in 1% of the cases. In this clinical decision making study in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, we observed a moderate agreement between PPVCAP and SVVPC with regard to categories used to guide fluid administration. Trial Registration: Clinical Trials.gov (NCT03137901).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Feature extraction technology; Fluid responsiveness; Mobile technology; Monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30607806     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-018-00241-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  29 in total

1.  Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure.

Authors:  F Michard; S Boussat; D Chemla; N Anguel; A Mercat; Y Lecarpentier; C Richard; M R Pinsky; J L Teboul
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Visual estimation of pulse pressure variation is not reliable: a randomized simulation study.

Authors:  Joseph Rinehart; Tanzeem Islam; Rob Boud; Allison Nguyen; Brenton Alexander; Cecilia Canales; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Prediction of fluid responsiveness by a continuous non-invasive assessment of arterial pressure in critically ill patients: comparison with four other dynamic indices.

Authors:  X Monnet; M Dres; A Ferré; G Le Teuff; M Jozwiak; A Bleibtreu; M-C Le Deley; D Chemla; C Richard; J-L Teboul
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a "gray zone" approach.

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Yannick Le Manach; Christoph K Hofer; Jean Pierre Goarin; Jean-Jacques Lehot; Benoît Vallet; Benoît Tavernier
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Clinical use of respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure to monitor the hemodynamic effects of PEEP.

Authors:  F Michard; D Chemla; C Richard; M Wysocki; M R Pinsky; Y Lecarpentier; J L Teboul
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 21.405

6.  Predicting fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients by using 3 dynamic indices: is it all equally effective?

Authors:  Petch Wacharasint; Amornchai Lertamornpong; Anan Wattanathum; Adisorn Wongsa
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2012-05

Review 7.  Accuracy of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang; Baolong Lu; Xiaoyan Sheng; Ni Jin
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 8.  Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Rodrigo Cavallazzi; Tajender Vasu; Amyn Hirani
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Outcome impact of goal directed fluid therapy during high risk abdominal surgery in low to moderate risk patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Davinder S Ramsingh; Chirag Sanghvi; Joseph Gamboa; Maxime Cannesson; Richard L Applegate
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 2.502

10.  Perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy based on radial arterial pulse pressure variation and continuous cardiac index trending reduces postoperative complications after major abdominal surgery: a multi-center, prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Cornelie Salzwedel; Jaume Puig; Arne Carstens; Berthold Bein; Zsolt Molnar; Krisztian Kiss; Ayyaz Hussain; Javier Belda; Mikhail Y Kirov; Samir G Sakka; Daniel A Reuter
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  8 in total

1.  Pulse pressure variation using a novel smartphone application (Capstesia) versus invasive pulse contour analysis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a secondary analysis focusing on clinical decision making.

Authors:  Olivier Desebbe; Jean-Louis Vincent; Bernd Saugel; Joseph Rinehart; Alexandre Joosten
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  [Comparison of pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation, and plethysmographic variability index in pediatric patients undergoing craniotomy].

Authors:  Y F Liu; L L Song; M W Xing; L X Cai; D X Wang
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2021-10-18

3.  Non-invasive measurement of pulse pressure variation using a finger-cuff method (CNAP system): a validation study in patients having neurosurgery.

Authors:  Moritz Flick; Phillip Hoppe; Jasmin Matin Mehr; Luisa Briesenick; Karim Kouz; Gillis Greiwe; Jürgen Fortin; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 1.977

4.  Estimation of pulse pressure variation and cardiac output in patients having major abdominal surgery: a comparison between a mobile application for snapshot pulse wave analysis and invasive pulse wave analysis.

Authors:  Phillip Hoppe; Fabian Gleibs; Luisa Briesenick; Alexandre Joosten; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Hemodynamic Monitoring by Smartphone-Preliminary Report from a Comparative Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Michał P Pluta; Magdalena Dziech; Mateusz N Zachura; Anna J Szczepańska; Piotr F Czempik; Piotr S Liberski; Łukasz J Krzych
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-01

6.  Evaluation of a novel optical smartphone blood pressure application: a method comparison study against invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring in intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Olivier Desebbe; Chbabou Anas; Brenton Alexander; Karim Kouz; Jean-Francois Knebel; Patrick Schoettker; Jacques Creteur; Jean-Louis Vincent; Alexandre Joosten
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 2.376

Review 7.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing end of year summary 2019: hemodynamic monitoring and management.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Lester A H Critchley; Thomas Kaufmann; Moritz Flick; Karim Kouz; Simon T Vistisen; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  Non-invasive measurement of pulse pressure variation using a finger-cuff method in obese patients having laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Moritz Flick; Roman Schumann; Phillip Hoppe; Iwona Bonney; Wilbert Wesselink; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 1.977

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.