Routine Broad-Range Fungal Polymerase Chain Reaction With DNA Sequencing in Patients With Suspected Mycoses Does Not Add Value and Is Not Cost-Effective.

CONTEXT.—: New molecular diagnostic tests regularly become available, and they may be assumed to be superior to traditional diagnostic studies. The added cost of these studies should be considered in conjunction with the value provided for patient care. OBJECTIVE.—: To assess the cost and diagnostic value of broad-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and DNA sequencing for the diagnosis of fungal infections compared with traditional studies. DESIGN.—: We reviewed the cost and clinical impact of broad-range fungal PCR/DNA sequencing for 65 specimens for which this test, a direct fungal examination, fungal culture, and a histopathologic assessment were performed. RESULTS.—: The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for each of the assays studied were, respectively: histopathology (83.3%, 100%, 100%, and 98.3%); direct examination (66.7%, 100%, 100%, and 96.7%); fungal culture (83.3%, 100%, 100%, and 98.3%); and broad-range fungal PCR/DNA sequencing (83.3%, 95.0%, 62.5%, and 98.3%). The cost for broad-range fungal PCR/DNA sequencing was $32,500, compared with $8,591.70 for all traditional tests combined, for the 65 specimens included in this review. CONCLUSIONS.—: Broad-range fungal PCR/DNA sequencing did not detect any infecting fungal pathogen that was not detected by at least 1 of the traditional methods, but 3 false-positives occurred. Broad-range fungal PCR/DNA sequencing is not a substitute for traditional laboratory studies and should be used judiciously to promote care affordability.