| Literature DB >> 33709128 |
Shawn R Lockhart1, Ralf Bialek2, Christopher C Kibbler3, Manuel Cuenca-Estrella4, Henrik E Jensen5, Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis6.
Abstract
The EORTC/MSGERC have revised the definitions for proven, probable, and possible fungal diseases. The tissue diagnosis subcommittee was tasked with determining how and when species can be determined from tissue in the absence of culture. The subcommittee reached a consensus decision that polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from tissue, but not immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridization, can be used for genus or species determination under the new EORTC/MSGERC guidelines, but only when fungal elements are identified by histology. Fungal elements seen in tissue samples by histopathology and identified by PCR followed by sequencing should fulfill the definition of a proven fungal infection, identified to genus/species, even in the absence of culture. This summary discusses the issues that were deliberated by the subcommittee to reach the consensus decision and outlines the criteria a laboratory should follow in order to produce data that meet the EORTC/MSGERC definitions.Entities:
Keywords: EORTC/MSG; FFPE; formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue; immunohistochemistry; tissue diagnosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33709128 PMCID: PMC7952508 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1836
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Infect Dis ISSN: 1058-4838 Impact factor: 9.079