| Literature DB >> 30604587 |
Hanping Qi1, Jing Ren1, Mingyao E1, Qianhui Zhang1, Yonggang Cao1, Lina Ba1, Chao Song1, Pilong Shi1, Bowen Fu1, Hongli Sun1.
Abstract
Cardiac hypertrophy is a common pathological change frequently accompanied by chronic hypertension and myocardial infarction. Nevertheless, the pathophysiological mechanisms of cardiac hypertrophy have never been elucidated. Recent studies indicated that miR-103 expression was significantly decreased in heart failure patients. However, less is known about the role of miR-103 in cardiac hypertrophy. The present study was designed to investigate the relationship between miR-103 and the mechanism of pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy. TRPV3 protein, cardiac hypertrophy marker proteins (BNP and β-MHC) and autophagy associated proteins (Beclin-1 and LC3-II) were up-regulated, as well as, miR-103 expression and autophagy associated proteins (p62) were down-regulated in cardiac hypertrophy models in vivo and in vitro respectively. Further results indicated that silencing TRPV3 or forcing overexpression of miR-103 could dramatically inhibit cell surface area, relative fluorescence intensity of Ca2+ signal and the expressions of BNP, β-MHC, Beclin-1 and LC3-II, but promote p62 expression. Moreover, TRPV3 protein was decreased in neonatal rat ventricular myocyte transfected with miR-103, but increased by AMO-103. Co-transfection of the miR-103 with the luciferase reporter vector into HEK293 cells caused a sharp decrease in luciferase activity compared with transfection of the luciferase vector alone. The miR-103-induced depression of luciferase activity was rescued by an AMO-103. These findings suggested that TRPV3 was a direct target of miR-103. In conclusion, miR-103 could attenuate cardiomyocyte hypertrophy partly by reducing cardiac autophagy activity through the targeted inhibition of TRPV3 signalling in the pressure-overloaded rat hearts.Entities:
Keywords: TRPV3; autophagy; cardiac hypertrophy; miR-103
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30604587 PMCID: PMC6378213 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.14095
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Figure 1Successfully established cardiac hypertrophy models in vivo and in vitro. The echocardiographic parameters were measured throughout the experiment. (A) Representative M‐mode images of the indicated groups. (B) LVPWs: left ventricular posterior wall depth. (C) LVAWs: left ventricular anterior wall thickness. (D) LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction. (E) LVFS: left ventricular fractional shortening. (F) Quantitative data of heart‐to‐bodyweight ratio. (G) Histological sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (HE) to detect cardiomyocyte hypertrophy (×200 and ×400). (H) Cardiomyocyte surface areas were detected (×200) with α‐SMA antibody (green signal). (I and J) The expressions of BNP protein were measured in vivo and in vitro. (K and L) The expressions of β‐MHC protein were measured in vivo and in vitro. Data were represented by mean ± SEM (n = 3‐6). *P < 0.05 vs control group
Figure 2The activity of autophagy was increased in cardiac hypertrophy heart and cultured cardiomyocyte challenged by Ang II 100 nmol L−1. (A and B) The expressions of Beclin‐1 protein were measured in vivo and in vitro. (C and D) The expressions of LC3‐II protein were measured in vivo and in vitro. (E and F) The expressions of p62 protein were measured in vivo and in vitro. Data were represented by mean ± SEM (n = 3). *P < 0.05 vs control group
Figure 3TRPV3 activation promoted cardiac hypertrophy. (A and B) The expressions of TRPV3 protein were measured in vivo and in vitro. (C and D) Successfully silencing TRPV3 by transfecting TRPV3‐siRNA sequence into cultured cardiomyocytes. (E) Silencing TRPV3 reduced the surface area of cardiomyocytes (×200) treated with Ang II. (F and G) Silencing TRPV3 suppressed the expressions of BNP and β‐MHC protein in cardiomyocytes treated with Ang II. (H) Relative fluorescence intensity of Ca2+ signal was recorded by laser scanning confocal microscope. Data were represented by mean ± SEM. (n = 3) *P < 0.05 vs control group; # P < 0.05 vs model group; @ P < 0.05 vs siTRPV3 group
Figure 4Silencing TRPV3 inhibited cardiac autophagy. (A‐C) The expressions of Beclin‐1, LC3‐II and p62 proteins were measured in cultured cardiomyocytes challenged by Ang II 100 nmol L−1. Data were represented by mean ± SEM (n = 3). *P < 0.05 vs control group; # P < 0.05 vs model group; @ P < 0.05 vs siTRPV3 group
Figure 5The effect of miR‐103 on cardiac hypertrophy. (A and B) The expressions of miR‐103 in cardiac hypertrophy models in vivo and in vitro were assayed by quantitative real‐time PCR analysis. U6 was used as an internal control. (C) Expression level of miR‐103 in cardiomyocytes transfected with scramble or miR‐103 mimics. (D) Representative photographs of immunofluorescence staining (×200) and statistical histogram of cardiomyocyte area. (E and F) The expressions of BNP and β‐MHC proteins were measured in cultured cardiomyocytes. (G) Forcing overexpression of miR‐103 repressed relative fluorescence intensity of Ca2+ signal in cultured cardiomyocytes challenged by Ang II. Data were represented by mean ± SEM (n = 3). *P < 0.05 vs control group; # P < 0.05 vs model group; @ P < 0.05 vs miR‐103 group
Figure 6The effect of miR‐103 on cardiac autophagy. Forcing overexpression of miR‐103 inhibits autophagic flux. (A) Representative images of mRFP‐GFP‐LC3 puncta (×200). (B) The numbers of GFP +/RFP + (yellow) and GFP −/RFP + (red) dots per cell were quantified. (C‐E) Forcing overexpression of miR‐103 restrained Beclin‐1 and LC3‐II, and promoted p62 protein expressions. Data were represented by mean ± SEM (n = 3). *P < 0.05 vs control group; # P < 0.05 vs model group; @ P < 0.05 vs miR‐103 group
Figure 7TRPV3 was the direct target of miR‐103 in cardiac hypertrophy. (A) Effect of miR‐103 on the protein expression of TRPV3 in cultured neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. (B) Luciferase reporter activities of chimerical vectors carrying luciferase gene and a fragment of TRPV3 3′‐untranslated region from rat containing the binding sites of miR‐103. Data were represented by mean ± SEM (n = 3‐5). *P < 0.05 vs control group; # P < 0.05 vs model group; @ P < 0.05 vs miR‐103 group
Figure 8Schematic diagram for the proposed miR‐103‐anti‐hypertrophic signalling pathways