Literature DB >> 30604355

Good Scientific Practice: Developing a Curriculum for Medical Students in Germany.

Katharina Fuerholzer1, Maximilian Schochow2, Florian Steger2.   

Abstract

German medical schools have not yet sufficiently introduced students to the field of good scientific practice (GSP). In order to prevent scientific misconduct and to foster scientific integrity, courses on GSP must be an integral part of the curriculum of medical students. Based on a review of the literature, teaching units and materials for two courses on GSP were developed and tested in a pilot course. The pilot course was accompanied by a pre-post evaluation that assessed students' knowledge and attitudes towards scientific integrity and scientific misconduct. A syllabus was designed that comprised the following six topics: theoretical foundations of GSP; scientific publishing; empirical data; scientific supervision and teamwork; clinical research; personal interests. The comparison pre versus post-intervention yielded statistically significant changes in regard to the participants' knowledge and attitude toward all forms of scientific misconduct treated in the course. As the majority of participants was not familiar with the fundamental regulations or guidelines of GSP, it seems crucial to train students in actively applying such norms to real-world conflicts. Students' unfamiliarity with the fundamentals of GSP can be linked to the fact that many students have already experienced forms of scientific misconduct. Thus, GSP syllabi should be closely adjusted to a student's realm of experience. All in all, courses on GSP can be seen as a potential means to increase the number of young scholars.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Curriculum development; Good scientific practice; Medical ethics in Germany; Problem-based learning; Scientific integrity; Scientific misconduct

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30604355     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-018-0076-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  15 in total

Review 1.  Six domains of research ethics. A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research.

Authors:  Kenneth D Pimple
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 2.  Problem based learning.

Authors:  Diana F Wood
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-08

3.  [Teaching Bioethics to Students of Medicine with Problem-Based Learning (PBL)].

Authors:  Joaquim Bosch-Barrera; Hugo C Briceño García; Dolors Capella; Carmen De Castro Vila; Ramón Farrés; Anna Quintanas; Josep Ramis; Rosa Roca; Joan Brunet
Journal:  Cuad Bioet       Date:  2015 May-Aug

4.  A model for teaching research ethics.

Authors:  Arri Eisen; Kathy P Parker
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Scientists behaving badly.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; Melissa S Anderson; Raymond de Vries
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Education in authorship ethics: should it be compulsory?

Authors:  Manjiri K Dighe; Thomas H Berquist
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Panel calls falsification in German case 'unprecedented'.

Authors:  R Koenig
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Ethics in 15 min per week.

Authors:  Ann M Peiffer; Christina E Hugenschmidt; Paul J Laurienti
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Problem-based learning: a review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues.

Authors:  M A Albanese; S Mitchell
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  Developing a problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum for professionalism and scientific integrity training for biomedical graduate students.

Authors:  Nancy L Jones; Ann M Peiffer; Ann Lambros; Martin Guthold; A Daniel Johnson; Michael Tytell; April E Ronca; J Charles Eldridge
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 2.903

View more
  1 in total

1.  Expanding Research Integrity: A Cultural-Practice Perspective.

Authors:  Govert Valkenburg; Guus Dix; Joeri Tijdink; Sarah de Rijcke
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.525

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.