Dilan A Patel1,2, Jing Xi1,3, Jingqin Luo1, Bilal Hassan1, Shana Thomas1, Cynthia X Ma1, Jian L Campian4,5. 1. Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. 2. Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA. 3. St. Luke's Hospital, St. Louis, MO, 63017, USA. 4. Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. campian.jian@wustl.edu. 5. Division of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8056, 660 South Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. campian.jian@wustl.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Peripheral blood lymphopenia and elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) have been associated with poor outcomes in various malignancies. However, existing literature has largely focused on baseline parameters. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy on absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC) and NLR in relation to survival outcomes in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 126 patients with TNBC treated at Washington University between 2005 and 2010. Cox proportional hazard model with time-varying covariates was applied to estimate the effect of time-varying ALC and NLR separately on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: All patients received RT and 112 patients received either neoadjuvant chemotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy, or both. Patients deceased had lower ALC and higher NLR compared to patients alive throughout the treatment course, even 1 year after treatment completion (ALC, 1 vs. 1.3, P = 0.03 and NLR, 3.9 vs. 2.6, P = 0.03). High ALC was associated with superior OS on both continuous and binary scales (cutoff of 1 K/ul) (HR 0.14; 95% CI 0.05-0.34; P < 0.001 and HR 0.28; 95% CI 0.13-0.61; P = 0.01, respectively). Additionally, high NLR was weakly associated with inferior OS on continuous scales (HR 1.1; 95% CI 1.06-1.15; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Post-treatment lymphopenia and NLR elevation can persist until 1 year after treatment completion. Both portend shorter survival for patients with TNBC. Our data support the use of ALC and NLR to identify high risk patients who may benefit from clinical trials rather than standard of care therapy.
PURPOSE: Peripheral blood lymphopenia and elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) have been associated with poor outcomes in various malignancies. However, existing literature has largely focused on baseline parameters. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy on absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC) and NLR in relation to survival outcomes in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 126 patients with TNBC treated at Washington University between 2005 and 2010. Cox proportional hazard model with time-varying covariates was applied to estimate the effect of time-varying ALC and NLR separately on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: All patients received RT and 112 patients received either neoadjuvant chemotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy, or both. Patients deceased had lower ALC and higher NLR compared to patients alive throughout the treatment course, even 1 year after treatment completion (ALC, 1 vs. 1.3, P = 0.03 and NLR, 3.9 vs. 2.6, P = 0.03). High ALC was associated with superior OS on both continuous and binary scales (cutoff of 1 K/ul) (HR 0.14; 95% CI 0.05-0.34; P < 0.001 and HR 0.28; 95% CI 0.13-0.61; P = 0.01, respectively). Additionally, high NLR was weakly associated with inferior OS on continuous scales (HR 1.1; 95% CI 1.06-1.15; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Post-treatment lymphopenia and NLR elevation can persist until 1 year after treatment completion. Both portend shorter survival for patients with TNBC. Our data support the use of ALC and NLR to identify high risk patients who may benefit from clinical trials rather than standard of care therapy.
Entities:
Keywords:
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR); Overall survival (OS); Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)
Authors: Mei-Yin C Polley; Roberto A Leon-Ferre; Samuel Leung; Angela Cheng; Dongxia Gao; Jason Sinnwell; Heshan Liu; David W Hillman; Abraham Eyman-Casey; Judith A Gilbert; Vivian Negron; Judy C Boughey; Minetta C Liu; James N Ingle; Krishna Kalari; Fergus Couch; Jodi M Carter; Daniel W Visscher; Torsten O Nielsen; Matthew P Goetz Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2021-01-03 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Alexandra von Au; Samra Shencoru; Lorenz Uhlmann; Luisa Mayer; Laura Michel; Markus Wallwiener; André Hennigs; Thomas Deutsch; Fabian Riedel; Joerg Heil; Michael Golatta; Andreas Schneeweiss; Florian Schütz; Christoph Domschke Journal: Arch Gynecol Obstet Date: 2022-08-18 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Taewoo Kim; Jessica Johnston; Sonia Castillo-Lluva; Francisco J Cimas; Stephen Hamby; Santiago Gonzalez-Moreno; Pedro Villarejo-Campos; Alison H Goodall; Guillermo Velasco; Alberto Ocana; Munitta Muthana; Endre Kiss-Toth Journal: Theranostics Date: 2022-04-24 Impact factor: 11.600
Authors: Lena Hueske; Tobias Bobinger; Antje Giede-Jeppe; Selim Atay; Julia Koehn; Anne Mrochen; Hannes Luecking; Philip Hoelter; Bastian Volbers; Hagen B Huttner Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-05-31 Impact factor: 4.379