Literature DB >> 30603737

Rationale and Design of the Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR) Study.

Pam K Mangat1, Susan Halabi2, Suanna S Bruinooge1, Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer1, Ajjai Alva3, Katherine A Janeway4, Philip J Stella5, Emile Voest6, Kathleen J Yost7, Jane Perlmutter8, Navin Pinto9, Edward S Kim10, Richard L Schilsky1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Case reports and small prospective trials suggest that administering targeted therapies to patients with advanced cancer and an identified genomic target may be associated with clinical benefit. The TAPUR Study, a phase II, prospective, non-randomized, multi-basket, pragmatic clinical trial aims to identify signals of drug activity when Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drugs are matched to pre-specified genomic targets in patients with advanced cancer, outside of approved indications.
METHODS: Patients eligible to participate in TAPUR are ages 12 years and older, with advanced, measurable or evaluable solid tumors, multiple myeloma or B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Eligible participants are matched to any of the sixteen FDA approved study drugs based on protocol specified genomic inclusion and exclusion criteria. Genomic profiling from any Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments certified, College of American Pathologists accredited laboratory is acceptable. The treating physician selects the treatment from the available study therapies, or consults with the TAPUR Molecular Tumor Board. Participants are placed into multiple parallel cohorts defined by tumor type, genomic alteration and drug. The primary study endpoint within each cohort is objective response or stable disease of at least 16 weeks duration. Secondary endpoints include safety, progression-free survival and overall survival.
RESULTS: More than 1000 participants have thus far been registered and more than 800 treated with a TAPUR study drug. Two study cohorts have permanently closed to enrollment due to lack of anti-tumor activity and 12 have expanded to the second stage of enrollment due to promising preliminary activity.
CONCLUSION: The TAPUR Study will describe the efficacy and toxicity of the targeted drugs used outside of their approved indications when matched to a somatic genomic variant.

Entities:  

Keywords:  basket trial; genomic target; molecular tumor board; oncology; pragmatic trial; precision medicine; study design; variant

Year:  2018        PMID: 30603737      PMCID: PMC6312096          DOI: 10.1200/PO.18.00122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol        ISSN: 2473-4284


  32 in total

1.  Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation.

Authors:  Paul B Chapman; Axel Hauschild; Caroline Robert; John B Haanen; Paolo Ascierto; James Larkin; Reinhard Dummer; Claus Garbe; Alessandro Testori; Michele Maio; David Hogg; Paul Lorigan; Celeste Lebbe; Thomas Jouary; Dirk Schadendorf; Antoni Ribas; Steven J O'Day; Jeffrey A Sosman; John M Kirkwood; Alexander M M Eggermont; Brigitte Dreno; Keith Nolop; Jiang Li; Betty Nelson; Jeannie Hou; Richard J Lee; Keith T Flaherty; Grant A McArthur
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Yung-Jue Bang; Eric Van Cutsem; Andrea Feyereislova; Hyun C Chung; Lin Shen; Akira Sawaki; Florian Lordick; Atsushi Ohtsu; Yasushi Omuro; Taroh Satoh; Giuseppe Aprile; Evgeny Kulikov; Julie Hill; Michaela Lehle; Josef Rüschoff; Yoon-Koo Kang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Rapid response to vemurafenib in a heavily pretreated patient with hairy cell leukemia and a BRAF mutation.

Authors:  Javier Munoz; Ellen Schlette; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Dramatic response induced by vemurafenib in a BRAF V600E-mutated lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Solange Peters; Olivier Michielin; Stefan Zimmermann
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2.

Authors:  D J Slamon; B Leyland-Jones; S Shak; H Fuchs; V Paton; A Bajamonde; T Fleming; W Eiermann; J Wolter; M Pegram; J Baselga; L Norton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  B G M Durie; J-L Harousseau; J S Miguel; J Bladé; B Barlogie; K Anderson; M Gertz; M Dimopoulos; J Westin; P Sonneveld; H Ludwig; G Gahrton; M Beksac; J Crowley; A Belch; M Boccadaro; M Cavo; I Turesson; D Joshua; D Vesole; R Kyle; R Alexanian; G Tricot; M Attal; G Merlini; R Powles; P Richardson; K Shimizu; P Tosi; G Morgan; S V Rajkumar
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 11.528

7.  Efficacy and safety of a specific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase in chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  B J Druker; M Talpaz; D J Resta; B Peng; E Buchdunger; J M Ford; N B Lydon; H Kantarjian; R Capdeville; S Ohno-Jones; C L Sawyers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-04-05       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Personalized medicine in a phase I clinical trials program: the MD Anderson Cancer Center initiative.

Authors:  Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou; Nancy G Iskander; David S Hong; Jennifer J Wheler; Gerald S Falchook; Siqing Fu; Sarina Piha-Paul; Aung Naing; Filip Janku; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Yang Ye; Sijin Wen; Donald Berry; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Proper inference from Simon's two-stage designs.

Authors:  Tatsuki Koyama; Heidi Chen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-07-20       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  34 in total

Review 1.  The current state of molecular testing in the treatment of patients with solid tumors, 2019.

Authors:  Wafik S El-Deiry; Richard M Goldberg; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Anthony F Shields; Geoffrey T Gibney; Antoinette R Tan; Jubilee Brown; Burton Eisenberg; Elisabeth I Heath; Surasak Phuphanich; Edward Kim; Andrew J Brenner; John L Marshall
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Oncology in 2050 - A Retrospective?

Authors:  Anthony M Joshua; Ian F Tannock
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-05-05

Review 3.  Review of precision cancer medicine: Evolution of the treatment paradigm.

Authors:  Apostolia M Tsimberidou; Elena Fountzilas; Mina Nikanjam; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 12.111

4.  Biostatistical and Logistical Considerations in the Development of Basket and Umbrella Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Laura M Yee; Lisa M McShane; Boris Freidlin; Margaret M Mooney; Edward L Korn
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.360

5.  Clinical Applications of Next-Generation Sequencing in Precision Oncology.

Authors:  Chris A Karlovich; P Mickey Williams
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.360

6.  Challenges and approaches to implementing master/basket trials in oncology.

Authors:  Amy Burd; Richard L Schilsky; John C Byrd; Ross L Levine; Vassiliki A Papadimitrakopoulou; Roy S Herbst; Mary W Redman; Brian J Druker; David R Gandara
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-07-23

7.  Oncologists' Use of Genomic Sequencing Data to Inform Clinical Management.

Authors:  Michele C Gornick; Erin Cobain; Lan Q Le; Natalie Bartnik; Elena Stoffel; Scott Schuetze; Moshe Talpaz; Arul Chinnaiyan; J Scott Roberts
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2018-02-21

8.  Comparison of Annotation Services for Next-Generation Sequencing in a Large-Scale Precision Oncology Program.

Authors:  Evangelia Katsoulakis; Jill E Duffy; Bradley Hintze; Neil L Spector; Michael J Kelley
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-03-24

9.  On the design and the analysis of stratified biomarker trials in the presence of measurement error.

Authors:  Susan Halabi; Chen-Yen Lin; Aiyi Liu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Guidelines for clinical evaluation of anti-cancer drugs.

Authors:  Hironobu Minami; Naomi Kiyota; Shiro Kimbara; Yuichi Ando; Tomoya Shimokata; Atsushi Ohtsu; Nozomu Fuse; Yasutoshi Kuboki; Toshio Shimizu; Noboru Yamamoto; Kazuto Nishio; Yutaka Kawakami; Shin-Ichi Nihira; Kazuhiro Sase; Takahiro Nonaka; Hideaki Takahashi; Yukiko Komori; Koshin Kiyohara
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 6.716

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.