AIM: To determine whether non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) level, in comparison with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level, is useful for predicting the values of various surrogate atherosclerosis markers in Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). METHODS: Data were retrieved from medical records of 265 subjects with T2DM who underwent laboratory tests to evaluate for atherosclerosis by using the following parameters: brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity, mean and maximum carotid intima-media thickness (mean CIMT and max-CIMT), and ankle-brachial index, with simultaneous fasting blood sampling for routine lipid parameters. RESULTS: In a multiple stepwise regression analysis, non-HDL-C level, but not LDL-C level, positively correlated with max-CIMT (β coefficient = 0.14, F = 6.84). Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that a 0.26 mmol/L (10 mg/dL) increase in non-HDL-C level, but not LDL-C level, was significantly associated with high risk of max-CIMT (≥1.1 mm; odds ratio, 1.096; 95 % confidence interval, 1.003-1.202; p = 0.046). However, in a receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, the addition of non-HDL-C level to the three significant independent variables obtained from the stepwise analyses did not significantly increased the area under the ROC curve (from 0.7789 to 0.7864, p = 0.4343). CONCLUSIONS: Non-HDL-C levels may be non-inferior to LDL-C level for the prediction of high-risk max-CIMT in Japanese subjects with T2DM.
AIM: To determine whether non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) level, in comparison with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level, is useful for predicting the values of various surrogate atherosclerosis markers in Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). METHODS: Data were retrieved from medical records of 265 subjects with T2DM who underwent laboratory tests to evaluate for atherosclerosis by using the following parameters: brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity, mean and maximum carotid intima-media thickness (mean CIMT and max-CIMT), and ankle-brachial index, with simultaneous fasting blood sampling for routine lipid parameters. RESULTS: In a multiple stepwise regression analysis, non-HDL-C level, but not LDL-C level, positively correlated with max-CIMT (β coefficient = 0.14, F = 6.84). Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that a 0.26 mmol/L (10 mg/dL) increase in non-HDL-C level, but not LDL-C level, was significantly associated with high risk of max-CIMT (≥1.1 mm; odds ratio, 1.096; 95 % confidence interval, 1.003-1.202; p = 0.046). However, in a receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, the addition of non-HDL-C level to the three significant independent variables obtained from the stepwise analyses did not significantly increased the area under the ROC curve (from 0.7789 to 0.7864, p = 0.4343). CONCLUSIONS: Non-HDL-C levels may be non-inferior to LDL-C level for the prediction of high-risk max-CIMT in Japanese subjects with T2DM.
Entities:
Keywords:
LDL cholesterol; Maximum carotid intima-media thickness; Non-HDL cholesterol; Type 2 diabetes
Authors: E Suzuki; A Kashiwagi; Y Nishio; K Egawa; S Shimizu; H Maegawa; M Haneda; H Yasuda; S Morikawa; T Inubushi; R Kikkawa Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: S Ebrahim; O Papacosta; P Whincup; G Wannamethee; M Walker; A N Nicolaides; S Dhanjil; M Griffin; G Belcaro; A Rumley; G D Lowe Journal: Stroke Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Vera Bittner; Regina Hardison; Sheryl F Kelsey; Bonnie H Weiner; Alice K Jacobs; George Sopko Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-11-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: D H O'Leary; J F Polak; R A Kronmal; S J Kittner; M G Bond; S K Wolfson; W Bommer; T R Price; J M Gardin; P J Savage Journal: Stroke Date: 1992-12 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: S Takiuchi; K Kamide; Y Miwa; M Tomiyama; M Yoshii; T Matayoshi; T Horio; Y Kawano Journal: J Hum Hypertens Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 3.012