| Literature DB >> 30602727 |
Deyang Ji1,2, Tao Li3, Jie Liu4, Saeed Amirjalayer1,2,5, Mianzeng Zhong6, Zhao-Yang Zhang7, Xianhui Huang7, Zhongming Wei6, Huanli Dong4, Wenping Hu8,9, Harald Fuchs10,11.
Abstract
With the fast development of organic electronics, organic semiconductors have been extensively studied for various optoelectronic applications, among which organic phototransistors recently emerged as one of the most promising light signal detectors. However, it is still a big challenge to endow organic phototransistors with both high mobility and high light-sensitivity because the low mobility of most organic photoresponsive materials limits the efficiency of transporting and collecting charge carriers. We herein report band-like charge transport in vacuum-deposited small-molecule thin films for organic phototransistor arrays which can be operated at very low dark currents (~10-12 A). Both high mobility and excellent optical figures of merit including photosensitivity, photoresponsivity and detectivity are achieved, wherein, unprecedentedly, a detectivity greater than 1017 cm Hz1/2 W-1 is obtained. All these key parameters are superior to state-of-the-art organic phototransistors, implying a great potential in optoelectronic applications.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30602727 PMCID: PMC6315033 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07943-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Device structure and optical feature of DPA film. a Molecular structure of DPA. b UV–vis absorption spectra of DPA film. c Spectral-dependent photoluminescence (PL) decay of DPA film. d Schematic diagram of OPTs
Fig. 2Electrical properties of DPA-based TFTs. a Distribution of TFT mobilities. b Square root of drain current (−IDS1/2) versus gate voltage (VGS) measured at different temperatures. c Temperature dependence of mobility. d ln(μ) versus 1000/T
Comparison of current work with representative phototransistors based on organic semiconductors
| Semiconductor | Mobility (cm2 V−1 s−1) | Photosensitivity | Photoresponsivity (A W−1) | Detectivity (cm Hz1/2 W−1) | Light density (mW cm−2) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBDTE (SC) | 1.62 | 105 | 9.8 × 103 | N/A | 0.037 |
[ |
| Me-ABT (SC) | 1.66 | 104 | 1.2 × 104 | N/A | 0.03 |
[ |
| TFT-CN (SC) | 1.36 | 5 × 105 | 9 × 104 | 6 × 1014 | 0.179 |
[ |
| A-EHDTT (SC) | 1.2–1.6 | 1.4 × 105 | 1.4 × 104 | N/A | 0.0014 |
[ |
| PY-4(THB) (SC) | 0.7 | 1.2 × 106 | 2 × 103 | N/A | 0.0056 |
[ |
| p-DTS(FBTTh2)2 (SC) | 1.8 | 103–104 | 3 × 103 | N/A | 7 |
[ |
| DNTT (TF) | N/A | 8.1 × 104 | 1.7 × 104 | 2 × 1014 | 1 |
[ |
| Spiro-DPSP (TF) | 1.3 × 10−6 | 5 × 102 | 1 | N/A | 0.19 |
[ |
| 6T (TF) | 0.09 | 1.3 × 103 | 1.5–2.4 | N/A | 1.5 |
[ |
| ABT(TF) | 0.4 | 800 | 1000 | N/A | 0.03 |
[ |
| DPP-DTT/PCBM (TF) | N/A | 5 × 104 | 350 | 5.7 × 1013 | 89 |
[ |
| DPP-DTT/PCBM (TF) | 0.14 p/0.06 n | 3 × 104 | 8 × 105 | 3 × 1012 | 57 |
[ |
| F16CuPc (TF) | 5.3 × 10−4 | 22 | 1.5 × 10−3 | N/A | 5.6 |
[ |
| P3HT (TF) | 0.01-0.07 | 3.8 × 103 | 245 | N/A | 51 |
[ |
| TIPS-Pentacene (TF) | 0.02 | 106–107 | N/A | N/A | 9–13 |
[ |
| DPA (TF) | 7.5a/12b | 8.5 × 107 | 1.34 × 105 | 1.2 × 1017 | 0.07–0.6 | This work |
SC single crystal, TF thin film aDark bIllumination
Fig. 3Charge transfer mechanism and performance of the phototransistor. Charge transfer mechanism in dark (a) and under illumination (b). c Energy band diagram of electrode/semiconductor interface in dark and under illumination. d Transfer characteristics of DPA-based phototransistor measured under different illumination intensities in the air. e P and R as a function of illumination intensity. f D* as a function of illumination intensity. g Calculated molecular orbitals describing the first electronic excitation (Evert = 388.67 nm; f = 0.1331) at the TD-DFT level. h −IDS at various illumination intensities (VGS = 0 V)
Fig. 4Performance of the two-terminal DPA-based photodetector. a The typical I–V curve of the two-terminal device in dark and under illumination at 430 nm (0.4 mW cm−2). b Photo-response measurements of the device in dark and under illumination (bias voltage, 10 V). c Iillumination/Idark as a function of time under illumination. d Current mapping of the 6 × 11 imaging matrix under illumination with “C” type mask (1.5 cm × 1.5 cm) on top