BACKGROUND: The widespread use and development of smartphones and mHealth apps has the potential to overcome communication deficiencies in health care. OBJECTIVE: To carry out a literature review of studies that evaluate patients' experience on the use of perioperative mHealth apps. METHODS: An up-to-date systematic review on studies assessing patients' use of mHealth apps for communicating with the health care team in the perioperative period was performed following the PRISMA statement. RESULTS: Ten studies (in 11 articles) were identified: 8 feasibility studies and 2 randomized controlled trials. Nine studies included apps used for postoperative monitoring while 1 study also provided preoperative guidance. DISCUSSION: An analysis of barriers and motivations of patients and health care professionals to the use of perioperative mHealth apps was performed. Barriers included patients' lack of confidence when using apps and potential lack of time from health care professionals to monitor information submitted by patients. Motivations included patients' sense of being looked after and potential cost-effectiveness and increased efficiency of health care services. This analysis led to the concept of the "ideal app" that would need to be developed following adequate protocols and security standards. Features of the ideal app include preoperative advice on medications and investigations, information on surgery, and a remote follow-up tool to improve safety and to minimize unnecessary clinic appointments and associated costs. CONCLUSION: There is an overall positive impression of the use of perioperative mHealth apps. However, further studies are required to assess the impact that they have on patients' care and healthcare professional services.
BACKGROUND: The widespread use and development of smartphones and mHealth apps has the potential to overcome communication deficiencies in health care. OBJECTIVE: To carry out a literature review of studies that evaluate patients' experience on the use of perioperative mHealth apps. METHODS: An up-to-date systematic review on studies assessing patients' use of mHealth apps for communicating with the health care team in the perioperative period was performed following the PRISMA statement. RESULTS: Ten studies (in 11 articles) were identified: 8 feasibility studies and 2 randomized controlled trials. Nine studies included apps used for postoperative monitoring while 1 study also provided preoperative guidance. DISCUSSION: An analysis of barriers and motivations of patients and health care professionals to the use of perioperative mHealth apps was performed. Barriers included patients' lack of confidence when using apps and potential lack of time from health care professionals to monitor information submitted by patients. Motivations included patients' sense of being looked after and potential cost-effectiveness and increased efficiency of health care services. This analysis led to the concept of the "ideal app" that would need to be developed following adequate protocols and security standards. Features of the ideal app include preoperative advice on medications and investigations, information on surgery, and a remote follow-up tool to improve safety and to minimize unnecessary clinic appointments and associated costs. CONCLUSION: There is an overall positive impression of the use of perioperative mHealth apps. However, further studies are required to assess the impact that they have on patients' care and healthcare professional services.
Entities:
Keywords:
breast surgery; ergonomics and/or human factors study; neurosurgery; orthopedic surgery; the business of surgery
Authors: Alexander R Vaccaro; Charles L Getz; Bruce E Cohen; Brian J Cole; Chester J Donnally Journal: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 3.020