Literature DB >> 30600222

Validation of a New Clinical Tool for Post-Intensive Care Syndrome.

Sophia Wang1, Duane Allen2, Anthony Perkins2, Patrick Monahan2, Sikandar Khan2, Sue Lasiter2, Malaz Boustani2, Babar Khan2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Post-intensive care syndrome is defined as the long-term cognitive, physical, and psychological impairments due to critical illness.
OBJECTIVE: To validate the self-report version of the Healthy Aging Brain Care Monitor as a clinical tool for detecting post-intensive care syndrome.
METHODS: A total of 142 patients who survived a stay in an intensive care unit completed the Healthy Aging Brain Care Monitor Self-report and standardized assessments of cognition, psychological symptoms, and physical functioning. Cronbach α was used to measure the internal consistency of the scale items. Validity between the Healthy Aging Brain Care Monitor and comparison tests was measured by using Spearman correlation coefficients. Patients with post-intensive care syndrome were compared with a sample of primary care patients (known groups validity) by using the Mann-Whitney test. General linear models were used to adjust for age, sex, and education level.
RESULTS: The total scale and all subscales had good to excellent internal consistency (Cronbach α, 0.83-0.92). Scores on the psychological subscale strongly correlated with standardized measures of psychological symptoms (Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.68-0.74). Results on the cognitive subscale correlated with the delayed memory measure (-0.51). Scores on the physical subscale correlated with the Physical Self-Maintenance Scale (-0.26). Patients with post-intensive care syndrome had significantly worse scores on subscales and total scores on the Healthy Aging Brain Care Monitor than did primary care patients.
CONCLUSION: The self-report version of the Healthy Aging Brain Care Monitor is a valid clinical tool for assessing symptoms of post-intensive care syndrome. ©2019 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30600222      PMCID: PMC6687461          DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2019639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Crit Care        ISSN: 1062-3264            Impact factor:   2.228


  18 in total

1.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  The measurement of everyday cognition (ECog): scale development and psychometric properties.

Authors:  Sarah Tomaszewski Farias; Dan Mungas; Bruce R Reed; Deborah Cahn-Weiner; William Jagust; Kathleen Baynes; Charles Decarli
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  The Cognitive Change Index as a Measure of Self and Informant Perception of Cognitive Decline: Relation to Neuropsychological Tests.

Authors:  Chatchawan Rattanabannakit; Shannon L Risacher; Sujuan Gao; Kathleen A Lane; Steven A Brown; Brenna C McDonald; Frederick W Unverzagt; Liana G Apostolova; Andrew J Saykin; Martin R Farlow
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.472

4.  Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living.

Authors:  M P Lawton; E M Brody
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1969

5.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

Authors:  K Kroenke; R L Spitzer; J B Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  Depressive Symptoms After Critical Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Anahita Rabiee; Sina Nikayin; Mohamed D Hashem; Minxuan Huang; Victor D Dinglas; O Joseph Bienvenu; Alison E Turnbull; Dale M Needham
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 7.  Long-term complications of critical care.

Authors:  Sanjay V Desai; Tyler J Law; Dale M Needham
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  CE: critical care recovery center: an innovative collaborative care model for ICU survivors.

Authors:  Babar A Khan; Sue Lasiter; Malaz A Boustani
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.220

9.  Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD): the first twenty years.

Authors:  Gerda G Fillenbaum; Gerald van Belle; John C Morris; Richard C Mohs; Suzanne S Mirra; Patricia C Davis; Pierre N Tariot; Jeremy M Silverman; Christopher M Clark; Kathleen A Welsh-Bohmer; Albert Heyman
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 21.566

Review 10.  Reported burden on informal caregivers of ICU survivors: a literature review.

Authors:  Ilse van Beusekom; Ferishta Bakhshi-Raiez; Nicolette F de Keizer; Dave A Dongelmans; Marike van der Schaaf
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  6 in total

1.  Healthy Aging Brain Care Monitor, Caregiver Version: Screening for Post-Intensive Care Syndrome.

Authors:  Sophia Wang; Yameena Jawed; Anthony Perkins; Sujuan Gao; Sarah Seyffert; Sikandar Khan; Malaz Boustani; Babar Khan
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.207

2.  Critical Care Recovery Center: a model of agile implementation in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors.

Authors:  Sophia Wang; Philip Hanneman; Chenjia Xu; Sujuan Gao; Duane Allen; Dmitry Golovyan; You Na Kheir; Nicole Fowler; Mary Austrom; Sikandar Khan; Malaz Boustani; Babar Khan
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 3.878

3.  Prevalence of post-intensive care syndrome among Japanese intensive care unit patients: a prospective, multicenter, observational J-PICS study.

Authors:  Daisuke Kawakami; Shigeki Fujitani; Takeshi Morimoto; Hisashi Dote; Mumon Takita; Akihiro Takaba; Masaaki Hino; Michitaka Nakamura; Hiromasa Irie; Tomohiro Adachi; Mami Shibata; Jun Kataoka; Akira Korenaga; Tomoya Yamashita; Tomoya Okazaki; Masatoshi Okumura; Takefumi Tsunemitsu
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Post-intensive care screening: French translation and validation of the Healthy Aging Brain Care-Monitor, hybrid version.

Authors:  Geoffrey Horlait; Charlotte Beaudart; Laurine Bougard; Stephen Bornheim; Camille Colson; Benoit Misset; Olivier Bruyère; Malaz Boustani; Anne-Françoise Rousseau
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  Feasibility of a home-based interdisciplinary rehabilitation program for patients with Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: the REACH study.

Authors:  Mel E Major; Daniela Dettling-Ihnenfeldt; Stephan P J Ramaekers; Raoul H H Engelbert; Marike van der Schaaf
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 6.  Post-Intensive Care Syndrome in Survivors from Critical Illness including COVID-19 Patients: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Charikleia S Vrettou; Vassiliki Mantziou; Alice G Vassiliou; Stylianos E Orfanos; Anastasia Kotanidou; Ioanna Dimopoulou
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.