Literature DB >> 30599712

Quantitative comparison of adaptive sampling methods for protein dynamics.

Eugen Hruska1, Jayvee R Abella2, Feliks Nüske1, Lydia E Kavraki2, Cecilia Clementi1.   

Abstract

Adaptive sampling methods, often used in combination with Markov state models, are becoming increasingly popular for speeding up rare events in simulation such as molecular dynamics (MD) without biasing the system dynamics. Several adaptive sampling strategies have been proposed, but it is not clear which methods perform better for different physical systems. In this work, we present a systematic evaluation of selected adaptive sampling strategies on a wide selection of fast folding proteins. The adaptive sampling strategies were emulated using models constructed on already existing MD trajectories. We provide theoretical limits for the sampling speed-up and compare the performance of different strategies with and without using some a priori knowledge of the system. The results show that for different goals, different adaptive sampling strategies are optimal. In order to sample slow dynamical processes such as protein folding without a priori knowledge of the system, a strategy based on the identification of a set of metastable regions is consistently the most efficient, while a strategy based on the identification of microstates performs better if the goal is to explore newer regions of the conformational space. Interestingly, the maximum speed-up achievable for the adaptive sampling of slow processes increases for proteins with longer folding times, encouraging the application of these methods for the characterization of slower processes, beyond the fast-folding proteins considered here.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30599712     DOI: 10.1063/1.5053582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  11 in total

1.  The dynamic conformational landscape of the protein methyltransferase SETD8.

Authors:  Shi Chen; Rafal P Wiewiora; Fanwang Meng; Nicolas Babault; Anqi Ma; Wenyu Yu; Kun Qian; Hao Hu; Hua Zou; Junyi Wang; Shijie Fan; Gil Blum; Fabio Pittella-Silva; Kyle A Beauchamp; Wolfram Tempel; Hualiang Jiang; Kaixian Chen; Robert J Skene; Yujun George Zheng; Peter J Brown; Jian Jin; Cheng Luo; John D Chodera; Minkui Luo
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 2.  Markov State Models to Elucidate Ligand Binding Mechanism.

Authors:  Yunhui Ge; Vincent A Voelz
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

3.  Markov state modeling reveals alternative unbinding pathways for peptide-MHC complexes.

Authors:  Jayvee R Abella; Dinler Antunes; Kyle Jackson; Gregory Lizée; Cecilia Clementi; Lydia E Kavraki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Adaptive Markov state model estimation using short reseeding trajectories.

Authors:  Hongbin Wan; Vincent A Voelz
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 5.  Modeling biomolecular kinetics with large-scale simulation.

Authors:  Peter M Kasson
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 7.786

Review 6.  Multiscale kinetic analysis of proteins.

Authors:  Jessica Mj Swanson
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 7.786

7.  Integrating Rigidity Analysis into the Exploration of Protein Conformational Pathways Using RRT* and MC.

Authors:  Fatemeh Afrasiabi; Ramin Dehghanpoor; Nurit Haspel
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  High-resolution mining of the SARS-CoV-2 main protease conformational space: supercomputer-driven unsupervised adaptive sampling.

Authors:  Théo Jaffrelot Inizan; Frédéric Célerse; Olivier Adjoua; Dina El Ahdab; Luc-Henri Jolly; Chengwen Liu; Pengyu Ren; Matthieu Montes; Nathalie Lagarde; Louis Lagardère; Pierre Monmarché; Jean-Philip Piquemal
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 9.825

Review 9.  Large-Scale Conformational Changes and Protein Function: Breaking the in silico Barrier.

Authors:  Laura Orellana
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2019-11-05

Review 10.  Computational methods for exploring protein conformations.

Authors:  Jane R Allison
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 5.407

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.