Appropriate treatment planning method for field joint dose in total body irradiation using helical tomotherapy.

Total body irradiation (TBI) using helical tomotherapy (HT) has advantages over the standard linear accelerator-based approach to the conditioning regimen for hematopoietic cell transplantation. However, the radiation field has to be divided into two independent irradiation plans to deliver a homogeneous dose to the whole body. A clinical target volume near the skin increases the skin surface dose; therefore, high- or low-dose regions arise depending on the set-up position accuracy because the two radiation fields are somewhat overlapped or separated. We aimed to determine an adequate treatment planning method robust to the set-up accuracy for the field joint dose distribution using HT-TBI. We calculated treatment plans reducing target volumes at the interface between the upper and lower body irradiations and evaluated these joint dose distributions via simulation and experimental studies. Target volumes used for the optimization calculation were reduced by 0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 cm from the boundary surface on the upper and lower sides. Combined dose distributions with set-up error simulated by modifying coordinate positions were investigated to find the optimal planning method. In the ideal set-up position, the target volume without a gap area caused field junctional doses of up to approximately 200%; therefore, target volumes reduced by 2.0-3.0 cm could suppress the maximum dose to within 150%. However, with set-up error, high-dose areas exceeding 150% and low-dose areas below 100% were found with 2.0 and 3.0 cm target volume reduction. Using the dynamic jaw (DJ) system, dose deviations caused by set-up error reached approximately 20%, which is not suitable for HT-TBI. Moreover, these dose distributions can be easily adjusted when combined with the intensity modulation technique for field boundary regions. The results of a simulation and experimental study using a film dosimetry were almost identical, which indicated that reducing the target volume at the field boundary surface by 2.5 cm produces the most appropriate target definition.