| Literature DB >> 30597533 |
Hayley K Charlton Hume1, João Vidigal2,3, Manuel J T Carrondo2, Anton P J Middelberg4, António Roldão2,3, Linda H L Lua5.
Abstract
Vaccination is the most effective method of disease prevention and control. Many viruses and bacteria that once caused catastrophic pandemics (e.g., smallpox, poliomyelitis, measles, and diphtheria) are either eradicated or effectively controlled through routine vaccination programs. Nonetheless, vaccine manufacturing remains incredibly challenging. Viruses exhibiting high antigenic diversity and high mutation rates cannot be fairly contested using traditional vaccine production methods and complexities surrounding the manufacturing processes, which impose significant limitations. Virus-like particles (VLPs) are recombinantly produced viral structures that exhibit immunoprotective traits of native viruses but are noninfectious. Several VLPs that compositionally match a given natural virus have been developed and licensed as vaccines. Expansively, a plethora of studies now confirms that VLPs can be designed to safely present heterologous antigens from a variety of pathogens unrelated to the chosen carrier VLPs. Owing to this design versatility, VLPs offer technological opportunities to modernize vaccine supply and disease response through rational bioengineering. These opportunities are greatly enhanced with the application of synthetic biology, the redesign and construction of novel biological entities. This review outlines how synthetic biology is currently applied to engineer VLP functions and manufacturing process. Current and developing technologies for the identification of novel target-specific antigens and their usefulness for rational engineering of VLP functions (e.g., presentation of structurally diverse antigens, enhanced antigen immunogenicity, and improved vaccine stability) are described. When applied to manufacturing processes, synthetic biology approaches can also overcome specific challenges in VLP vaccine production. Finally, we address several challenges and benefits associated with the translation of VLP vaccine development into the industry.Entities:
Keywords: capsomere; computational; omics technologies; synthetic biology; vaccine; virus-like particle
Year: 2018 PMID: 30597533 PMCID: PMC7161758 DOI: 10.1002/bit.26890
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Bioeng ISSN: 0006-3592 Impact factor: 4.530
Figure 1Design tools for VLP vaccine engineering. Multitude of tools and recent advances in synthetic biology enable screening for pathogen‐specific antigens with high immunogenic potential and engineering of VLP function. (1) Omics technologies enable rapid identification and discovery of novel/potential vaccine antigens. (2) Structural biology and (3) system immunology assist rational reconfiguration and engineering of epitopes/VLPs for enhanced immunogenicity. (4) Bioinformatics and computational biology accelerate data analysis and translation into applicable knowledge. (a) Engineering VLP function on different types of VLP. While nonenveloped VLPs are commonly engineered using genetic engineering or chemical conjugation, enveloped VLPs rely on pseudotyping for function engineering. (b) VLPs can be engineered to offer broader immunogenicity, improved immunogenicity, or enhanced stability. Broadly immunogenic VLPs can be obtained by displaying multiple antigenically distinct epitopes (Pushko et al., 2011; Schwartzman et al., 2015), highly conserved epitopes (Krammer, 2015; Wiersma et al., 2015), or computationally optimized epitopes (Carter et al., 2016) within a single VLP. Improving VLP immunogenicity can be achieved by incorporating immunomodulatory agents, such as dendritic cells targeting antibodies into particles structure (Rosenthal et al., 2014). VLP stability can be enhanced by modulating particles formulation (Collins et al., 2017; Lua et al., 2014). VLP: virus‐like particle [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Nonenveloped virus‐like particle platforms for the display of unrelated antigens
| Platforms | Targets | Antigens | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteriophage AP205 | HIV‐1 | HIV‐1 gp41 epitopes | Pastori et al. ( |
| Influenza | M2e | Tissot et al. ( | |
| Malaria | Circumsporozoite | Janitzek et al. ( | |
| Malaria | Pfs25 and VAR2CSA proteins | Thrane et al. ( | |
| Tuberculosis | Ag58A | Thrane et al. ( | |
| West Nile virus | Domain III of E glycoprotein | Spohn et al. ( | |
| Bacteriophage Qβ | Allergenic | Allergen Der p 1 | Kundig et al. ( |
| Alzheimer's disease | Aβ1–6 (amyloid peptide) | Wiessner et al. ( | |
| HIV‐1 | CCR5 coreceptor | Hunter, Smyth, Durfee, and Chackerian ( | |
| Hypertension | Angiotensin II | Tissot et al. ( | |
| Influenza | Hemagglutinin (globular head) | Jegerlehner et al. ( | |
| Influenza | M2e | Bessa et al. ( | |
| Nicotine dependence | Nicotine | Maurer et al. ( | |
| Type 2 diabetes | Interleukin‐1β | Spohn et al. ( | |
| Bovine Papillomavirus | Alzheimer's disease | Amyloid β peptide | Li et al. ( |
| HIV‐1 | CCR5 peptide | Chackerian, Lowy, and Schille ( | |
| HIV‐1 | V3 loop of HIV‐1 gp120 | X. S. Liu et al. ( | |
| HIV‐1 | HIV‐1 gp41 neutralizing epitopes | Zhai et al. ( | |
| Human papillomavirus (HPV) | HPV 16 L2 neutralizing epitopes | Slupetzky et al. ( | |
| Cowpea mosaic virus | Canine parvovirus | VP2 capsid protein | Langeveld et al. ( |
| HIV‐1 | Glycoprotein 41 peptide | McLain, Porta, Lomonossoff, Durrani, and Dimmock ( | |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | CPMV‐PAE5 peptide | Brennan et al. ( | |
|
| Truncated D2‐domain | Rennermalm et al. ( | |
| Cucumber mosaic virus | Alzheimer's disease | Amyloid β peptides | Vitti et al. ( |
| Hepatitis C virus | HCV‐derived R9 and R10 mimotopes | Nuzzaci et al., ( | |
| Newcastle disease virus | Neutralizing epitopes | Y. Zhao and Hammond ( | |
| Flock House virus | Anthrax | Von Willebrand A domain of ANTXR2 cellular receptor/protective antigen | Manayani et al. ( |
| Hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus | Epitopes of hepatitis C virus and hepatitis B surface antigen | Chen et al. ( | |
| HIV‐1 | V3 loop of HIV‐1 gp120 protein | Scodeller ( | |
| Influenza | A‐helix epitope of HA2 | Schneemann et al. ( | |
| Hepatitis B core | Anthrax | Domain 4 epitope of the protective antigen (PA) of anthrax toxin | Bandurska et al. ( |
| Anthrax | 2β2–2β3 loop of PA | Yin et al. ( | |
| Dengue virus type 2 | Envelope domain III | Arora, Tyagi, Swaminathan, and Khanna ( | |
| Enterovirus 71 | SP55 and SP70 epitopes of enterovirus 71 | Ye et al. ( | |
| Hepatitis C virus (HCV) | B‐ and T‐cell epitopes of HCV | Mihailova et al. ( | |
| Influenza | M2e | De Filette et al. ( | |
| Lyme disease | OspA and variants of OspC | Nassal et al. ( | |
| Lyme disease | tHRF, Salp15, and Iric‐1 | Kolb, Wallich, and Nassal ( | |
| Malaria | CSP‐specific B and T cell epitopes | Sällberg, Hughes, Jones, Phillips, and Milich ( | |
| Tuberculosis | CFP‐10 | Dhanasooraj, Kumar, and Mundayoor ( | |
| Human papillomavirus | Human respiratory syncytial virus | Neutralizing epitopes | Murata, Lightfoote, Rose, and Walsh ( |
| Murine polyomavirus | Cancer (Breast) | Her2 | Tegerstedt, Lindencrona, et al. ( |
| Cancer (Prostate) | Prostate‐specific antigen | Eriksson et al. ( | |
| Group A | J8 peptide | Middelberg et al. ( | |
| Influenza | M2e | Wibowo, Chuan, Lua, and Middelberg ( | |
| Influenza | Helix 190 antigen | Anggraeni et al. ( | |
| Influenza | Hemagglutinin (globular head) | Waneesorn, Wibowo, Bingham, Middelberg, and Lua ( | |
| Rotavirus | VP8 antigen | Tekewe et al. ( | |
| Tobacco mosaic virus | Foot and mouth disease | Foot and mouth disease peptides | L. G. Wu et al. ( |
| Murine hepatitis | Murine hepatitis coronavirus neutralizing epitope | Koo et al. ( | |
| Poliovirus | Poliovirus type 3 epitope | Haynes et al. ( | |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Peptide of outer membrane protein F | Staczek, Bendahmane, Gilleland, Beachy, and Gilleland ( | |
| Rabbit papillomavirus | L2 epitopes | Palmer et al. ( |
Enveloped virus‐like particle platforms for pseudotyping
| Platforms | Targets | Antigens | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| BIV Gag | Influenza | Hemagglutinin (HA) (subtypes) and neuraminidase (NA) | Pushko et al. ( |
| HBsAg | Dengue virus | Envelope domain III | Harahap‐Carrillo, Ceballos‐Olvera, and Valle ( |
| Malaria | Circumsporozoite protein | Stoute et al. ( | |
| HIV1‐Gag | Dengue virus | Envelope domain III | Chua et al. ( |
| West Nile virus | Glycoprotein E | ||
| Influenza | HA and NA | Carter et al. ( | |
| Influenza M1 | Influenza | HA subtypes | Schwartzman et al. ( |
| Influenza | M2 | Song et al. ( | |
| Influenza | NA | Ben‐Yedidia ( | |
| Respiratory syncytial virus | RSV A2 fusion | Kim et al. ( | |
| Murine leukemia virus Gag | Cancer | Melanoma antigens | Kurg et al. ( |
| Human cytomegalovirus | Glycoprotein B | Kirchmeier et al. ( | |
| Rift Valley fever virus | Glycoproteins GN, GC, and nucleoprotein N | Mandell et al. ( | |
| Influenza | HA and NA | Haynes et al. ( |
Figure 2Application of synthetic biology to VLP vaccine platforms. (1) Enhanced immunogenicity of peptides is achieved through their insertion into exposed loops of viral capsid proteins (Murata et al., 2009; Slupetzky et al., 2007; Ye et al., 2014). (2) The structural properties of complex peptides are maintained through the incorporation of epitope scaffolds into exposed loops (Schneemann et al., 2012). (3) Large antigens are modularized onto VLP vaccine platforms using long flexible linkers to maintain structural separation between the viral capsid protein and the antigen (Kratz et al., 1999); or onto preformed VLPs using plug and play technologies, such as SpyCatcher/SpyTag (Brune et al., 2016) and AviTag (Thrane et al., 2015). (4) Dual expression of modified and unmodified viral capsid proteins reduces steric hindrance and permits VLP assembly (Tekewe et al., 2017). (5) The SplitCore system permits modularization of antigens with an extended structure through the coexpression of modified and unmodified HBcAg core fragments (Walker, Skamel, and Nassal, 2011). (a) Synthetic production of capsomeres minimizes host cell contaminants reducing required bioprocessing steps (Chuan et al., 2010). (b) Synthetic engineering of baculovirus vectors can increase VLP expression yield (Gómez‐Sebastián et al., 2014; Y. K. Liu et al., 2015; Y. V. Liu et al., 2015). VLP: virus‐like particle [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]