Literature DB >> 30597377

Fabrication and selection of surrogate knee implant bearings for experimental evaluation of embedded in-vivo sensors.

Robert I Ponder1, Mohsen Safaei2, Steven R Anton3.   

Abstract

Total Knee Replacement (TKR) is a common procedure that is gaining importance with the aging American population. Although TKR is common, about 20% of patients report being unhappy with their results. Previous research has pointed to misalignment and loosening as contributing factors to negative outcomes. What is lacking in the field of TKR is a sensory system that can determine the internal loads of the knee in a direct manner. Implant bearings embedded with piezoelectric transducers have already shown promise in providing accurate sensing data. To perform further experimentation, prototype implant bearings that can be accurately and efficiently produced are needed. This work investigates various fabrication processes and possible materials to provide a foundation for developing surrogate biomechanical implants, especially those with integrated smart sensors. In this study, an original knee bearing is scanned and the resulting geometries used to generate prototypes. The prototypes are fabricated using a variety of methods including CNC machining and additive manufacturing. The prototypes are then tested to determine load distribution, active sensor performance, as well as kinematic performance under loading. The results of this study show that FDM printing provides quick and affordable results but is not ideal for rigorous experimentation. SLA printed prototypes are improved in final quality with an increase in fabrication time. Lastly, CNC machined processes are more labor intensive but can provide the best material characteristics. The findings from this study aim to have an impact not only on researchers studying biomedical sensing, but on the field of biomechanical implants.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Embedded transducers; Mechanical behavior; Orthopedic implants; Piezoelectric sensing; Rapid prototyping

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30597377      PMCID: PMC6449152          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  18 in total

1.  An intraoperative pressure-measuring device used in total knee arthroplasties and its kinematics correlations.

Authors:  Ray C Wasielewski; Daniel D Galat; Richard D Komistek
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Design, calibration and pre-clinical testing of an instrumented tibial tray.

Authors:  Bernd Heinlein; Friedmar Graichen; Alwina Bender; Antonius Rohlmann; Georg Bergmann
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Low power IC design of the Wireless Monitoring System of the Orthopedic Implants.

Authors:  Hong Chen; Ming Liu; Chen Jia; Chun Zhang; Zhihua Wang
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2007

4.  Maxillofacial reconstruction using custom-made artificial bones fabricated by inkjet printing technology.

Authors:  Hideto Saijo; Kazuyo Igawa; Yuki Kanno; Yoshiyuki Mori; Kayoko Kondo; Koutaro Shimizu; Shigeki Suzuki; Daichi Chikazu; Mitsuki Iino; Masahiro Anzai; Nobuo Sasaki; Ung-il Chung; Tsuyoshi Takato
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 5.  Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene: mechanics, morphology, and clinical behavior.

Authors:  M C Sobieraj; C M Rimnac
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2008-12-25

6.  Tibiofemoral kinematics and condylar motion during the stance phase of gait.

Authors:  Michal Kozanek; Ali Hosseini; Fang Liu; Samuel K Van de Velde; Thomas J Gill; Harry E Rubash; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Trends in hip and knee joint replacement: socioeconomic inequalities and projections of need.

Authors:  T Dixon; M Shaw; S Ebrahim; P Dieppe
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?

Authors:  Robert B Bourne; Bert M Chesworth; Aileen M Davis; Nizar N Mahomed; Kory D J Charron
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  State-of-The-Art and Applications of 3D Imaging Sensors in Industry, Cultural Heritage, Medicine, and Criminal Investigation.

Authors:  Giovanna Sansoni; Marco Trebeschi; Franco Docchio
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Steven M Kurtz; Edmund Lau; Kevin Ong; Vanessa Chiu; Thomas P Vail; Harry E Rubash; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  2 in total

1.  Design and analysis of a compliant 3D printed energy harvester housing for knee implants.

Authors:  Geofrey Yamomo; Nabid Hossain; Shahrzad Towfighian; Ryan Willing
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 2.  A Review of Printable Flexible and Stretchable Tactile Sensors.

Authors:  Kirthika Senthil Kumar; Po-Yen Chen; Hongliang Ren
Journal:  Research (Wash D C)       Date:  2019-11-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.