Literature DB >> 30596876

PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration.

Karel G M Moons1, Robert F Wolff2, Richard D Riley3, Penny F Whiting4, Marie Westwood2, Gary S Collins5, Johannes B Reitsma1, Jos Kleijnen6, Sue Mallett7.   

Abstract

Prediction models in health care use predictors to estimate for an individual the probability that a condition or disease is already present (diagnostic model) or will occur in the future (prognostic model). Publications on prediction models have become more common in recent years, and competing prediction models frequently exist for the same outcome or target population. Health care providers, guideline developers, and policymakers are often unsure which model to use or recommend, and in which persons or settings. Hence, systematic reviews of these studies are increasingly demanded, required, and performed. A key part of a systematic review of prediction models is examination of risk of bias and applicability to the intended population and setting. To help reviewers with this process, the authors developed PROBAST (Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool) for studies developing, validating, or updating (for example, extending) prediction models, both diagnostic and prognostic. PROBAST was developed through a consensus process involving a group of experts in the field. It includes 20 signaling questions across 4 domains (participants, predictors, outcome, and analysis). This explanation and elaboration document describes the rationale for including each domain and signaling question and guides researchers, reviewers, readers, and guideline developers in how to use them to assess risk of bias and applicability concerns. All concepts are illustrated with published examples across different topics. The latest version of the PROBAST checklist, accompanying documents, and filled-in examples can be downloaded from www.probast.org.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30596876     DOI: 10.7326/M18-1377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  169 in total

1.  Development and validation of a novel diagnostic nomogram model to predict primary aldosteronism in patients with hypertension.

Authors:  Meng-Hui Wang; Nan-Fang Li; Qin Luo; Guo-Liang Wang; Mulalibieke Heizhati; Ling Wang; Lei Wang; Wei-Wei Zhang
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Prognostic tools for identification of high risk in people with Crohn's disease: systematic review and cost-effectiveness study.

Authors:  Steven J Edwards; Samantha Barton; Mariana Bacelar; Charlotta Karner; Peter Cain; Victoria Wakefield; Gemma Marceniuk
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 3.  A systematic review of the status and methodological considerations for estimating risk of first ever stroke in the general population.

Authors:  Wei Xu; Jiuyi Huang; Qingsong Yu; Hongfan Yu; Yang Pu; Qiuling Shi
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 4.  Designing deep learning studies in cancer diagnostics.

Authors:  Andreas Kleppe; Ole-Johan Skrede; Sepp De Raedt; Knut Liestøl; David J Kerr; Håvard E Danielsen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Prognostic models for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lu Xu; Bingjie He; Yunjing Zhang; Lu Chen; Dongsheng Fan; Siyan Zhan; Shengfeng Wang
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Reporting of demographic data and representativeness in machine learning models using electronic health records.

Authors:  Selen Bozkurt; Eli M Cahan; Martin G Seneviratne; Ran Sun; Juan A Lossio-Ventura; John P A Ioannidis; Tina Hernandez-Boussard
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Risk assessments and structured care interventions for prevention of foot ulceration in diabetes: development and validation of a prognostic model.

Authors:  Fay Crawford; Francesca M Chappell; James Lewsey; Richard Riley; Neil Hawkins; Donald Nicolson; Robert Heggie; Marie Smith; Margaret Horne; Aparna Amanna; Angela Martin; Saket Gupta; Karen Gray; David Weller; Julie Brittenden; Graham Leese
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.014

8.  Cancer diagnostic tools to aid decision-making in primary care: mixed-methods systematic reviews and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Antonieta Medina-Lara; Bogdan Grigore; Ruth Lewis; Jaime Peters; Sarah Price; Paolo Landa; Sophie Robinson; Richard Neal; William Hamilton; Anne E Spencer
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.014

9.  Prognostic models for predicting relapse or recurrence of major depressive disorder in adults.

Authors:  Andrew S Moriarty; Nicholas Meader; Kym Ie Snell; Richard D Riley; Lewis W Paton; Carolyn A Chew-Graham; Simon Gilbody; Rachel Churchill; Robert S Phillips; Shehzad Ali; Dean McMillan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-06

10.  A systematic review of risk prediction models for perioperative mortality after thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Marcus Taylor; Syed F Hashmi; Glen P Martin; Michael Shackcloth; Rajesh Shah; Richard Booton; Stuart W Grant
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-04-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.