Literature DB >> 30595520

Ectopic Activation of the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Signaling Cascade Reveals Its Biochemical Design.

Chu Chen1, Ian P Whitney2, Anand Banerjee3, Carlos Sacristan4, Palak Sekhri5, David M Kern2, Adrienne Fontan5, Geert J P L Kops4, John J Tyson3, Iain M Cheeseman2, Ajit P Joglekar6.   

Abstract

Switch-like activation of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is critical for accurate chromosome segregation and for cell division in a timely manner. To determine the mechanisms that achieve this, we engineered an ectopic, kinetochore-independent SAC activator: the "eSAC." The eSAC stimulates SAC signaling by artificially dimerizing Mps1 kinase domain and a cytosolic KNL1 phosphodomain, the kinetochore signaling scaffold. By exploiting variable eSAC expression in a cell population, we defined the dependence of the eSAC-induced mitotic delay on eSAC concentration in a cell to reveal the dose-response behavior of the core signaling cascade of the SAC. These quantitative analyses and subsequent mathematical modeling of the dose-response data uncover two crucial properties of the core SAC signaling cascade: (1) a cellular limit on the maximum anaphase-inhibitory signal that the cascade can generate due to the limited supply of SAC proteins and (2) the ability of the KNL1 phosphodomain to produce the anaphase-inhibitory signal synergistically, when it recruits multiple SAC proteins simultaneously. We propose that these properties together achieve inverse, non-linear scaling between the signal output per kinetochore and the number of signaling kinetochores. When the number of kinetochores is low, synergistic signaling by KNL1 enables each kinetochore to produce a disproportionately strong signal output. However, when many kinetochores signal concurrently, they compete for a limited supply of SAC proteins. This frustrates synergistic signaling and lowers their signal output. Thus, the signaling activity of unattached kinetochores will adapt to the changing number of signaling kinetochores to enable the SAC to approximate switch-like behavior.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cell signaling; eSAC; kinetochore; mitosis; spindle assembly checkpoint

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30595520      PMCID: PMC6324986          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  62 in total

1.  A quantitative model for ordered Cdk substrate dephosphorylation during mitotic exit.

Authors:  Céline Bouchoux; Frank Uhlmann
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  CDK-dependent potentiation of MPS1 kinase activity is essential to the mitotic checkpoint.

Authors:  Violeta Morin; Susana Prieto; Sabrina Melines; Sonia Hem; Michel Rossignol; Thierry Lorca; Julien Espeut; Nathalie Morin; Ariane Abrieu
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Computer-based analysis of the binding steps in protein complex formation.

Authors:  D Bray; S Lay
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Activation of the budding yeast spindle assembly checkpoint without mitotic spindle disruption.

Authors:  K G Hardwick; E Weiss; F C Luca; M Winey; A W Murray
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-08-16       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Evidence that Aurora B is implicated in spindle checkpoint signalling independently of error correction.

Authors:  Stefano Santaguida; Claudio Vernieri; Fabrizio Villa; Andrea Ciliberto; Andrea Musacchio
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Recruitment of Mad1 to metaphase kinetochores is sufficient to reactivate the mitotic checkpoint.

Authors:  Edward R Ballister; Michelle Riegman; Michael A Lampson
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 10.539

7.  The kinetochore encodes a mechanical switch to disrupt spindle assembly checkpoint signalling.

Authors:  Pavithra Aravamudhan; Alan A Goldfarb; Ajit P Joglekar
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 28.824

8.  The human Mis12 complex is required for kinetochore assembly and proper chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Susan L Kline; Iain M Cheeseman; Tetsuya Hori; Tatsuo Fukagawa; Arshad Desai
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Bub3 reads phosphorylated MELT repeats to promote spindle assembly checkpoint signaling.

Authors:  Ivana Primorac; John R Weir; Elena Chiroli; Fridolin Gross; Ingrid Hoffmann; Suzan van Gerwen; Andrea Ciliberto; Andrea Musacchio
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Arrayed BUB recruitment modules in the kinetochore scaffold KNL1 promote accurate chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Mathijs Vleugel; Eelco Tromer; Manja Omerzu; Vincent Groenewold; Wilco Nijenhuis; Berend Snel; Geert J P L Kops
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  The mammalian kinetochore-microtubule interface: robust mechanics and computation with many microtubules.

Authors:  Alexandra F Long; Jonathan Kuhn; Sophie Dumont
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 2.  Cell-cycle phospho-regulation of the kinetochore.

Authors:  Cinzia Klemm; Peter H Thorpe; Guðjón Ólafsson
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 3.886

3.  Kinetochore Recruitment of the Spindle and Kinetochore-Associated (Ska) Complex Is Regulated by Centrosomal PP2A in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Karen I Lange; Aly Suleman; Martin Srayko
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Aurora B phosphorylates Bub1 to promote spindle assembly checkpoint signaling.

Authors:  Babhrubahan Roy; Simon J Y Han; Adrienne N Fontan; Soubhagyalaxmi Jema; Ajit P Joglekar
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 5.  BUB3, beyond the Simple Role of Partner.

Authors:  Patrícia M A Silva; Hassan Bousbaa
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 6.525

Review 6.  Chemical tools for dissecting cell division.

Authors:  Geng-Yuan Chen; Michael A Lampson
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 15.040

7.  The Bub1-TPR Domain Interacts Directly with Mad3 to Generate Robust Spindle Checkpoint Arrest.

Authors:  Ioanna Leontiou; Nitobe London; Karen M May; Yingrui Ma; Lucile Grzesiak; Bethan Medina-Pritchard; Priya Amin; A Arockia Jeyaprakash; Sue Biggins; Kevin G Hardwick
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  The copy-number and varied strengths of MELT motifs in Spc105 balance the strength and responsiveness of the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  Babhrubahan Roy; Simon Jy Han; Adrienne Nicole Fontan; Ajit P Joglekar
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 9.  The p53 family member p73 in the regulation of cell stress response.

Authors:  Svetlana Zvereva; Aleksandra Dalina; Igor Blatov; Julian M Rozenberg; Ilya Zubarev; Daniil Luppov; Alexander Bessmertnyi; Alexander Romanishin; Lamak Alsoulaiman; Vadim Kumeiko; Alexander Kagansky; Gerry Melino; Carlo Ganini; Nikolai A Barlev
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 4.540

Review 10.  Spindle assembly checkpoint activation and silencing at kinetochores.

Authors:  Pablo Lara-Gonzalez; Jonathon Pines; Arshad Desai
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 7.727

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.