Literature DB >> 30595109

A novel version of Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire-3: Turkish validation study.

Ceyda Şahan1, Hakan Baydur2, Yücel Demiral3.   

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to adapt the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire Version-3 (COPSOQ-3) into the Turkish language.
Methods: This is a methodologic study. The field study occurred in four workplaces (call center, hospital, plastic and metal industries). The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) Measure of Sampling Adequacy and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity were used to assess the suitability of the sample for factor analysis. The principal component analysis and varimax rotation methods were used to identify the factor structure.The internal consistency was assessed using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient.
Results: In total, 1076 respondents' questionnaires were evaluated. Fifty-eight percent of the participants were men and the mean age was 31.1 ± 7.7. Sampling adequacy was considered adequate (KMO =0.929). The factor analysis of the Turkish COPSOQ (COPSOQ-TR) identified 19 factors with eigenvalues higher than one and explained 66.1% of the total variance. The Cronbach's alpha values of 23 dimensions were over 0.70. The Cronbach's alpha values of control over working time and predictability were 0.54 and 0.66, respectively. The model was an excellent fit (Chi-Square = 8514.5, x2/df = 2.48, RMSEA = 0.038, SRMR = 0.053, CFI = 0.98).Conclusions: Findings show that COPSOQ-TR is a reliable and valid instrument that can be a useful tool to measure psychosocial risks in the Turkish language.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; psychosocial risks; scale; work

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30595109     DOI: 10.1080/19338244.2018.1538095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Environ Occup Health        ISSN: 1933-8244            Impact factor:   1.663


  5 in total

1.  Comparing perceived psychosocial working conditions of nurses and physicians in two university hospitals in Germany with other German professionals - feasibility of scale conversion between two versions of the German Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ).

Authors:  Anke Wagner; Matthias Nübling; Antje Hammer; Tanja Manser; Monika A Rieger
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.646

2.  COPSOQ III in Germany: validation of a standard instrument to measure psychosocial factors at work.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Lincke; Martin Vomstein; Alexandra Lindner; Inga Nolle; Nicola Häberle; Ariane Haug; Matthias Nübling
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 2.646

3.  The Portuguese Third Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire: Preliminary Validation Studies of the Middle Version among Municipal and Healthcare Workers.

Authors:  Teresa P Cotrim; Pedro Bem-Haja; Anabela Pereira; Cláudia Fernandes; Rui Azevedo; Samuel Antunes; Joaquim S Pinto; Flávio Kanazawa; Isabel Souto; Elisabeth Brito; Carlos F Silva
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Validation of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire Version III and Establishment of Benchmarks for Psychosocial Risk Management in Sweden.

Authors:  Hanne Berthelsen; Hugo Westerlund; Gunnar Bergström; Hermann Burr
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  The Third Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire.

Authors:  Hermann Burr; Hanne Berthelsen; Salvador Moncada; Matthias Nübling; Emilie Dupret; Yucel Demiral; John Oudyk; Tage S Kristensen; Clara Llorens; Albert Navarro; Hans-Joachim Lincke; Christine Bocéréan; Ceyda Sahan; Peter Smith; Anne Pohrt
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2019-11-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.