| Literature DB >> 30594919 |
Amit K Saha1,2, Brendan R Schmidt1, Julie Wilhelmy2, Vy Nguyen1, Abed Abugherir1, Justin K Do1, Mohsen Nemat-Gorgani2, Ronald W Davis2, Anand K Ramasubramanian1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is a poorly understood disease. Amongst others symptoms, the disease is associated with profound fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, sleep abnormalities, and other symptoms that are made worse by physical or mental exertion. While the etiology of the disease is still debated, evidence suggests oxidative damage to immune and hematological systems as one of the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease. Since red blood cells (RBCs) are well-known scavengers of oxidative stress, and are critical in microvascular perfusion and tissue oxygenation, we hypothesized that RBC deformability is adversely affected in ME/CFS.Entities:
Keywords: Chronic Fatigue Syndrome; cell deformability; microfluidics; red blood cells
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30594919 PMCID: PMC6398549 DOI: 10.3233/CH-180469
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Hemorheol Microcirc ISSN: 1386-0291 Impact factor: 2.375
Fig.1Red blood cell (RBC) motion in microfluidic channels. (A) Representative traces of a RBC before, during and after entry through the test channels (5μm×5μm). Scale bar is 5μm.; (B1) Cell length (major axis) and (B2) Distribution of cell lengths, of RBCs before entering the test channels; (C1) Elongation index and (C2) Distribution of elongation indices of deformed RBCs inside the test channels; (D) Comparison of scaled average lengths of undeformed (L1) and deformed (L2) RBCs from healthy controls and ME/CFS patients. The lengths were scaled to channel width (d = 5μm); (E1) Entry times and (E2) Distribution of entry times, i.e., time taken by RBCs to fully enter the test channels; (F1) Transit velocity and (F2) Distribution of transit velocities, based on the time taken by RBCs to travel 100μm distance inside the test channels. The results are based on at least two separate microfluidic devices per donor, and at least 100 cells were tested per device. The results are shown as mean±SD. *denotes significant differences in comparison to healthy samples, based on 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc analysis (p < 0.0001; n = 16 pairs). For distribution, the results are presented as histogram with relative frequency in percentage. HC: RBCs from healthy donors; CFS: RBCs from ME/CFS patients.