Leslie E Cofie1,2, Jacqueline M Hirth1,2, Abbey B Berenson1,2, Rebeca Wong2,3. 1. 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas. 2. 2 Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Women's Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas. 3. 3 Preventive Medicine and Community Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
Abstract
Objective: Research is limited on how immigrant status affects provider recommendations and adherence to breast cancer screening among women with chronic conditions. This study examined whether chronic comorbidities are associated with breast cancer screening recommendations and adherence, as well as differences between foreign-born and United States-born women. Materials and Methods: The study examined data from the 2013 and 2015 National Health Interview Survey on women 50-74 years of age (N = 12,425). Chi-square analysis was used to assess relationships between chronic comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, and obesity) and mammography screening recommendation and adherence (screened in the last 3 years). Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis examined the relationship between foreign-born status and mammography screening, adjusting for provider screening recommendation and chronic comorbidities. Results: Obesity and hypertension were positively associated with mammography screening recommendation and adherence (p < 0.05). United States-born women, compared with foreign-born women, had higher rates of obesity (28% vs. 24%, p < 0.001) and hypertension (44% vs. 41%, p < 0.001). Compared with normal-weight women, underweight women (odds ratio [OR]: 0.57, confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-0.82) were significantly less likely to report receiving mammograms. In stratified analyses, foreign-born underweight women (OR: 0.25, CI: 0.09-0.68) remained less likely to report receiving mammograms after controlling for years lived in the United States and citizenship status. Conclusion: Public health intervention efforts must encourage mammography screening for both United States-born and foreign-born women, especially those diagnosed with chronic conditions.
Objective: Research is limited on how immigrant status affects provider recommendations and adherence to breast cancer screening among women with chronic conditions. This study examined whether chronic comorbidities are associated with breast cancer screening recommendations and adherence, as well as differences between foreign-born and United States-born women. Materials and Methods: The study examined data from the 2013 and 2015 National Health Interview Survey on women 50-74 years of age (N = 12,425). Chi-square analysis was used to assess relationships between chronic comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, and obesity) and mammography screening recommendation and adherence (screened in the last 3 years). Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis examined the relationship between foreign-born status and mammography screening, adjusting for provider screening recommendation and chronic comorbidities. Results:Obesity and hypertension were positively associated with mammography screening recommendation and adherence (p < 0.05). United States-born women, compared with foreign-born women, had higher rates of obesity (28% vs. 24%, p < 0.001) and hypertension (44% vs. 41%, p < 0.001). Compared with normal-weight women, underweight women (odds ratio [OR]: 0.57, confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-0.82) were significantly less likely to report receiving mammograms. In stratified analyses, foreign-born underweight women (OR: 0.25, CI: 0.09-0.68) remained less likely to report receiving mammograms after controlling for years lived in the United States and citizenship status. Conclusion: Public health intervention efforts must encourage mammography screening for both United States-born and foreign-born women, especially those diagnosed with chronic conditions.
Entities:
Keywords:
breast cancer; diabetes; hypertension; immigrant health; mammography screening; obesity
Authors: Israel De Alba; F Allan Hubbell; Juliet M McMullin; Jamie M Sweningson; Richard Saitz Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Patricia Y Miranda; Nengliang Yao; S Amy Snipes; Rhonda BeLue; Eugene Lengerich; Marianne M Hillemeier Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2017-03-31 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: M Sue Kirkman; Vanessa Jones Briscoe; Nathaniel Clark; Hermes Florez; Linda B Haas; Jeffrey B Halter; Elbert S Huang; Mary T Korytkowski; Medha N Munshi; Peggy Soule Odegard; Richard E Pratley; Carrie S Swift Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Sydney E Kim; Alexandra E Bachorik; Kimberly A Bertrand; Christine M Gunn Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2021-12-17 Impact factor: 3.017
Authors: Mosi Adesina Ifatunji; Yanica Faustin; Wendy Lee; Deshira Wallace Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-27 Impact factor: 4.614