C C Wee1, E P McCarthy, R B Davis, R S Phillips. 1. Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA. cweekuo@caregroup.harvard.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Compared with thinner women, obese women have higher mortality rates for breast and cervical cancer. In addition, obesity leads to adverse social and psychological consequences. Whether obesity limits access to screening for breast and cervical cancer is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relation between obesity and screening with Papanicolaou (Pap) smears and mammography. DESIGN: Population-based survey. SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: 11 435 women who responded to the "Year 2000 Supplement" of the 1994 National Health Interview Survey. MEASUREMENTS: Screening with Pap smears and mammography was assessed by questionnaire. RESULTS: In women 18 to 75 years of age who had not previously undergone hysterectomy (n = 8394), fewer overweight women (78%) and obese women (78%) than normal-weight women (84%) had had Pap smears in the previous 3 years (P < 0.001). After adjustment for sociodemographic information, insurance and access to care, illness burden, and provider specialty, rate differences for screening with Pap smears were still seen among overweight (-3.5% [95% CI, -5.9% to -1.1%]) and obese women (-5.3% [CI, -8.0% to -2.6%]). In women 50 to 75 years of age (n = 3502), fewer overweight women (64%) and obese women (62%) than normal-weight women (68%) had had mammography in the previous 2 years (P < 0.002). After adjustment, rate differences were -2.8% (CI, -6.7% to 0.9%) for overweight women and -5.4% (CI, -10.8% to -0.1%) for obese women. CONCLUSIONS: Overweight and obese women were less likely to be screened for cervical and breast cancer with Pap smears and mammography, even after adjustment for other known barriers to care. Because overweight and obese women have higher mortality rates for cervical and breast cancer, they should be targeted for increased screening.
BACKGROUND: Compared with thinner women, obesewomen have higher mortality rates for breast and cervical cancer. In addition, obesity leads to adverse social and psychological consequences. Whether obesity limits access to screening for breast and cervical cancer is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relation between obesity and screening with Papanicolaou (Pap) smears and mammography. DESIGN: Population-based survey. SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: 11 435 women who responded to the "Year 2000 Supplement" of the 1994 National Health Interview Survey. MEASUREMENTS: Screening with Pap smears and mammography was assessed by questionnaire. RESULTS: In women 18 to 75 years of age who had not previously undergone hysterectomy (n = 8394), fewer overweight women (78%) and obesewomen (78%) than normal-weight women (84%) had had Pap smears in the previous 3 years (P < 0.001). After adjustment for sociodemographic information, insurance and access to care, illness burden, and provider specialty, rate differences for screening with Pap smears were still seen among overweight (-3.5% [95% CI, -5.9% to -1.1%]) and obesewomen (-5.3% [CI, -8.0% to -2.6%]). In women 50 to 75 years of age (n = 3502), fewer overweight women (64%) and obesewomen (62%) than normal-weight women (68%) had had mammography in the previous 2 years (P < 0.002). After adjustment, rate differences were -2.8% (CI, -6.7% to 0.9%) for overweight women and -5.4% (CI, -10.8% to -0.1%) for obesewomen. CONCLUSIONS: Overweight and obesewomen were less likely to be screened for cervical and breast cancer with Pap smears and mammography, even after adjustment for other known barriers to care. Because overweight and obesewomen have higher mortality rates for cervical and breast cancer, they should be targeted for increased screening.
Authors: Vickie M Mays; Antronette K Yancey; Susan D Cochran; Mark Weber; Jonathan E Fielding Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Ellen A Schur; Joann E Elmore; Tracy Onega; Karen J Wernli; Edward A Sickles; Sebastien Haneuse Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2011-12-05 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Aruna Kamineni; Melissa L Anderson; Emily White; Stephen H Taplin; Peggy Porter; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Kathleen Malone; Diana S M Buist Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2012-12-07 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Jeanne M Ferrante; Denise C Fyffe; Marielos L Vega; Alicja K Piasecki; Pamela A Ohman-Strickland; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2009-12-17 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Ted D Adams; Antoinette M Stroup; Richard E Gress; Kenneth F Adams; Eugenia E Calle; Sherman C Smith; R Chad Halverson; Steven C Simper; Paul N Hopkins; Steven C Hunt Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 5.002