Literature DB >> 30592500

The Danish Psychosocial Work Environment Questionnaire (DPQ): Development, content, reliability and validity.

Thomas Clausen1, Ida Eh Madsen, Karl Bang Christensen, Jakob B Bjorner, Otto M Poulsen, Thomas Maltesen, Vilhelm Borg, Reiner Rugulies.   

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to describe the development and the content of the Danish Psychosocial Work Environment Questionnaire (DPQ) and to test its reliability and validity. Methods We describe the identification of dimensions, the development of items, and the qualitative and quantitative tests of the reliability and validity of the DPQ. Reliability and validity of a 150 item version of the DPQ was evaluated in a stratified sample of 8958 employees in 14 job groups of which 4340 responded. Reliability was investigated using internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The factorial validity was investigated using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). For each multi-item scale, we undertook CFA within each job group and multi-group CFA to investigate factorial invariance across job groups. Finally, using multi-group multi-factor CFA, we investigated whether scales were empirically distinct. Results Internal consistency reliabilities and test-retest reliabilities were satisfactory. Factorial validity of the multi-item scales was satisfactory within each of the 14 job groups. Factorial invariance was demonstrated for 10 of the 28 multi-item scales. The hypothesis that the scales of the DPQ were empirically distinct was supported. The final DPQ version consisted of 119 items covering 38 different psychosocial work environment dimensions. Conclusions Overall, the DPQ is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing psychosocial working conditions in a variety of job groups. The results indicate, however, that questions about psychosocial working conditions may be understood differently across job groups, which may have implications for the comparability of questionnaire-based measures of psychosocial working conditions across job groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30592500     DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health        ISSN: 0355-3140            Impact factor:   5.024


  16 in total

1.  Work-unit organizational changes and risk of cardiovascular disease: a prospective study of public healthcare employees in Denmark.

Authors:  Johan Høy Jensen; Esben Meulengracht Flachs; Janne Skakon; Naja Hulvej Rod; Jens Peter Bonde; Ichiro Kawachi
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Assessing the Psychosocial Work Environment in Relation to Mental Health: A Comprehensive Approach.

Authors:  Faraz V Shahidi; Monique A M Gignac; John Oudyk; Peter M Smith
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.179

3.  How qualitative studies can strengthen occupational health research.

Authors:  Cécile Rl Boot; Astrid R Bosma
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 5.024

4.  Changes in effort-reward imbalance at work and risk of onset of sleep disturbances in a population-based cohort of workers in Denmark.

Authors:  Mads Nordentoft; Naja H Rod; Jens Peter Bonde; Jakob B Bjorner; Bryan Cleal; Ida E H Madsen; Linda L Magnusson Hanson; Mette A Nexo; Tom Sterud; Reiner Rugulies
Journal:  Sleep Med X       Date:  2020-08-08

5.  Construct validity of a global scale for Workplace Social Capital based on COPSOQ III.

Authors:  Hanne Berthelsen; Hugo Westerlund; Jan Hyld Pejtersen; Emina Hadzibajramovic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Development of a Questionnaire for Measuring Employees' Perception of Selection, Optimisation and Compensation at the Leadership, Group and Individual Levels.

Authors:  Annette Meng; Iben L Karlsen; Vilhelm Borg; Thomas Clausen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Effort-reward imbalance at work and weight changes in a nationwide cohort of workers in Denmark.

Authors:  Mads Nordentoft; Naja Hulvej Rod; Jens Peter Bonde; Jakob Bue Bjorner; Bryan Cleal; Ann Dyreborg Larsen; Ida E H Madsen; Linda L Magnusson Hanson; Mette Andersen Nexo; Line Rosendahl Meldgaard Pedersen; Tom Sterud; Tianwei Xu; Reiner Rugulies
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 2.214

8.  Can childcare work be designed to promote moderate and vigorous physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness and health? Study protocol for the Goldilocks-childcare randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Mark Lidegaard; Anders Fritz Lerche; Pernille Kold Munch; Kathrine Greby Schmidt; Charlotte Lund Rasmussen; Charlotte Diana Nørregaard Rasmussen; Svend Erik Mathiassen; Leon Straker; Andreas Holtermann
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Physical and psychosocial work environmental risk factors of low-back pain: protocol for a 1 year prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Rúni Bláfoss; Per Aagaard; Lars Louis Andersen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  The APHIRM toolkit: an evidence-based system for workplace MSD risk management.

Authors:  Jodi Oakman; Wendy Macdonald
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.