Literature DB >> 30590509

Transvenous lead extraction in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy devices is not associated with increased 30-day mortality.

Justin Gould1, Magdalena Klis1, Bradley Porter1, Benjamin J Sieniewicz1, Baldeep S Sidhu1, Simon Claridge1, Steven E Williams1, Anoop Shetty1, Mark O'Neill1, Jaswinder Gill1, Christopher A Rinaldi1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) may be necessary due to system infection/erosion or lead malfunction. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients undergoing TLE may be at greater risk due to increased comorbidities. We examined whether patients with CRT systems undergoing TLE had more comorbidities and higher 30-day mortality than those with non-CRT devices. METHODS AND
RESULTS: All TLEs between October 2000 and December 2016 were prospectively collected. During this period 925 TLEs occurred (CRT group 231, non-CRT group 694). Cardiac resynchronization therapy patients were older (68.1 ± 10.8 years vs. 64.3 ± 16.1 years, P = 0.024); more likely male (85.7% vs. 69%, P < 0.001); had lower mean left ventricular ejection fraction (34.1 ± 12.7% vs. 48.3 ± 12.9%, P < 0.001); had higher prevalence of renal impairment (33.8% vs. 13.7%, P < 0.001) and were more likely to have ≥2 comorbidities (84% vs. 40.1%, P < 0.001). Mean lead dwell time was lower in the CRT group (5.6 ± 5.5 years vs. 7.6 ± 7.1 years, P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in all-cause 30-day mortality rates between CRT (3.0%, n = 7) and non-CRT patients (2.0%, n = 14) (P = 0.443). The majority of deaths in both groups were due to sepsis. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed age, renal impairment and sepsis were associated with increased risk of 30-day mortality. Transvenous lead extraction of a CRT system did not predict 30-day mortality.
CONCLUSION: Transvenous lead extraction in CRT patients was not associated with increased 30-day mortality when compared with non-CRT patients. Age, renal impairment and sepsis were independent predictors of 30-day mortality. Sepsis was the main cause of 30-day mortality. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author(s) 2018. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac implantable electronic device extraction; Mortality; Transvenous lead extraction

Year:  2019        PMID: 30590509     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euy290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  3 in total

1.  Financial and resource costs of transvenous lead extraction in a high-volume lead extraction centre.

Authors:  Justin Gould; Baldeep S Sidhu; Bradley Porter; Benjamin J Sieniewicz; Scott Freeman; Evelien Cj de Wilt; Julia C Glover; Reza Razavi; Christopher A Rinaldi
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Assessing long-term survival and hospitalization following transvenous lead extraction in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy devices: A propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Vishal S Mehta; Hugh O'Brien; Mark K Elliott; Baldeep S Sidhu; Justin Gould; Anoop K Shetty; Steven Niederer; Christopher A Rinaldi
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2021-10-30

3.  Step by Step through the Years-High vs. Low Energy Lead Extraction Using Advanced Extraction Techniques.

Authors:  David Zweiker; Basma El Sawaf; Giuseppe D'Angelo; Andrea Radinovic; Alessandra Marzi; Luca R Limite; Antonio Frontera; Gabriele Paglino; Michael Spartalis; Donah Zachariah; Kenzaburo Nakajima; Paolo Della Bella; Patrizio Mazzone
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.964

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.