| Literature DB >> 30586938 |
Jianqiu Tu1, Huiping Liu2, Naxin Sun3, Shaojuan Liu4, Pei Chen5.
Abstract
Steam explosion pretreatment was conducted on seabuckthom pomace. Response surface methodology was used to optimize the treatment conditions of steam explosion, including steam pressure, duration and particle size. After this, the content of total flavonoids and the antioxidant capacity of total flavonoids were investigated. Results showed that when the steam pressure was 2.0 MPa, duration was 88 s and a sieving mesh size was 60, the total flavonoids content in seabuckthorm reached a maximum of 24.74 ± 0.71 mg CAE/g, an increase of 246% compared with that without steam explosion treatment (7.14 ± 0.42 mg CAE/g). Also, DPPH and ·OH free radical scavenging ability showed significant improvement, with an IC50 decrease to 13.53 μg/mL and 4.32 μg/mL, respectively, far lower than that in original samples. Through the scanning electron microscope, the surface of seabuckthom pomace after steam explosion was crinkled, curly, and holey. Our study showed that the content of total flavonoids in seabuckthom pomace could be obviously promoted and the antioxidant capacity of total flavonoids also improved significantly, after applying steam explosion pretreatment to seabuckthom pomace, making this approach meaningful for the reuse of seabuckthom pomace resources.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant capacity; seabuckthom pomace; steam explosion; total flavonoids
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30586938 PMCID: PMC6337078 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24010060
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Central experiment design and results.
| Runs | A Steam Pressure (MPa) | B Duration (s) | C Particle Size (mesh) | Y TFs (mg CAE/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.5 | 60 | 60 | 18.75 |
| 2 | 2.5 | 120 | 60 | 15.62 |
| 3 | 2.0 | 120 | 40 | 18.65 |
| 4 | 2.0 | 90 | 60 | 24.24 |
| 5 | 2.0 | 90 | 60 | 24.51 |
| 6 | 2.0 | 90 | 60 | 25.52 |
| 7 | 2.0 | 120 | 80 | 17.36 |
| 8 | 2.0 | 60 | 40 | 19.69 |
| 9 | 1.5 | 90 | 80 | 18.89 |
| 10 | 2.0 | 90 | 60 | 24.34 |
| 11 | 2.5 | 90 | 80 | 17.44 |
| 12 | 1.5 | 120 | 60 | 16.39 |
| 13 | 1.5 | 60 | 60 | 15.34 |
| 14 | 2.0 | 90 | 60 | 25.09 |
| 15 | 2.5 | 90 | 40 | 22.54 |
| 16 | 2.0 | 60 | 80 | 18.46 |
| 17 | 1.5 | 90 | 60 | 16.67 |
Regression equation variance analysis results.
| Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | Coefficient | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 203.99 | 9 | 22.67 | 24.74 | 98.76 | <0.0001 |
| A | 6.23 | 1 | 6.23 | 0.88 | 27.15 | 0.0012 |
| B | 2.23 | 1 | 2.23 | −0.53 | 9.7 | 0.0170 |
| C | 3.65 | 1 | 3.65 | −0.68 | 15.88 | 0.0053 |
| AB | 4.37 | 1 | 4.37 | −1.05 | 19.03 | 0.0033 |
| AC | 13.40 | 1 | 13.40 | −1.83 | 58.37 | 0.0001 |
| BC | 9.000 × 10−4 | 1 | 9.000 × 10−4 | −0.015 | 3.922 × 10−3 | 0.9518 |
| A2 | 65.20 | 1 | 65.20 | −3.94 | 284.08 | <0.0001 |
| B2 | 77.13 | 1 | 77.13 | −4.28 | 336.08 | <0.0001 |
| C2 | 15.52 | 1 | 15.52 | −1.92 | 67.63 | <0.0001 |
| Residual | 1.61 | 7 | 0.23 | |||
| Lack of fit | 0.41 | 3 | 0.14 | 0.46 | 0.7247 | |
| Pure error | 1.19 | 4 | 0.30 | |||
| Cor total | 205.60 | 16 | ||||
| R2 | 0.992 | |||||
| AdjR2 | 0.9821 | |||||
| C.V. % | 2.4 |
p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance.
Figure 1Response surface plot (A–C) and contour plot (D–F) showing the effects of the variables on content of TFs. The three independent variables set were steam pressure, duration and material diameter.
Figure 2Scanning electron microcopy (SEM) images of SP (A: treated by steam explosion at 2.0 MPa, 88 s and 60 mesh untreated, B: original).
Figure 3The effect of the TFs on the free radical scavenging of DPPH was obtained by steam explosion. Solid line: TFs after steam explosion, broken line: original TFs.
Figure 4The effect of the extraction liquid on the free radical scavenging of hydroxyl was obtained by steam explosion. Solid line: TFs after steam explosion, broken line: original TFs.