Sarah J Lehman1, Lauren Tal-Grinspan2, Melissa L Lynn3, Joshua Strom4, Grace E Benitez5, Mark E Anderson6, Jil C Tardiff3. 1. Department of Physiological Sciences (S.J.L.), University of Arizona, Tucson. 2. Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York (L.T.-G.). 3. Department of Medicine (M.L.L., J.C.T.), University of Arizona, Tucson. 4. Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine (J.S.), University of Arizona, Tucson. 5. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry (G.E.B.), University of Arizona, Tucson. 6. Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (M.E.A.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although the genetic causes of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) are widely recognized, considerable lag in the development of targeted therapeutics has limited interventions to symptom palliation. This is in part attributable to an incomplete understanding of how point mutations trigger pathogenic remodeling. As a further complication, similar mutations within sarcomeric genes can result in differential disease severity, highlighting the need to understand the mechanism of progression at the molecular level. One pathway commonly linked to HCM progression is calcium homeostasis dysregulation, though how specific mutations disrupt calcium homeostasis remains unclear. METHODS: To evaluate the effects of early intervention in calcium homeostasis, we used 2 mouse models of sarcomeric HCM (cardiac troponin T R92L and R92W) with differential myocellular calcium dysregulation and disease presentation. Two modes of intervention were tested: inhibition of the autoactivated calcium-dependent kinase (calmodulin kinase II [CaMKII]) via the AC3I peptide and diltiazem, an L-type calcium channel antagonist. Two-dimensional echocardiography was used to determine cardiac function and left ventricular remodeling, and atrial remodeling was monitored via atrial mass. Sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ATPase activity was measured as an index of myocellular calcium handling and coupled to its regulation via the phosphorylation status of phospholamban. RESULTS: We measured an increase in phosphorylation of CaMKII in R92W animals by 6 months of age, indicating increased autonomous activity of the kinase in these animals. Inhibition of CaMKII led to recovery of diastolic function and partially blunted atrial remodeling in R92W mice. This improved function was coupled to increased sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ATPase activity in the R92W animals despite reduction of CaMKII activation, likely indicating improvement in myocellular calcium handling. In contrast, inhibition of CaMKII in R92L animals led to worsened myocellular calcium handling, remodeling, and function. Diltiazem-HCl arrested diastolic dysfunction progression in R92W animals only, with no improvement in cardiac remodeling in either genotype. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a highly specific, mutation-dependent role of activated CaMKII in HCM progression and a precise therapeutic target for clinical management of HCM in selected cohorts. Moreover, the mutation-specific response elicited with diltiazem highlights the necessity to understand mutation-dependent progression at a molecular level to precisely intervene in disease progression.
BACKGROUND: Although the genetic causes of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) are widely recognized, considerable lag in the development of targeted therapeutics has limited interventions to symptom palliation. This is in part attributable to an incomplete understanding of how point mutations trigger pathogenic remodeling. As a further complication, similar mutations within sarcomeric genes can result in differential disease severity, highlighting the need to understand the mechanism of progression at the molecular level. One pathway commonly linked to HCM progression is calciumhomeostasis dysregulation, though how specific mutations disrupt calcium homeostasis remains unclear. METHODS: To evaluate the effects of early intervention in calcium homeostasis, we used 2 mouse models of sarcomeric HCM (cardiac troponin T R92L and R92W) with differential myocellular calcium dysregulation and disease presentation. Two modes of intervention were tested: inhibition of the autoactivated calcium-dependent kinase (calmodulin kinase II [CaMKII]) via the AC3I peptide and diltiazem, an L-type calcium channel antagonist. Two-dimensional echocardiography was used to determine cardiac function and left ventricular remodeling, and atrial remodeling was monitored via atrial mass. Sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ATPase activity was measured as an index of myocellular calcium handling and coupled to its regulation via the phosphorylation status of phospholamban. RESULTS: We measured an increase in phosphorylation of CaMKII in R92W animals by 6 months of age, indicating increased autonomous activity of the kinase in these animals. Inhibition of CaMKII led to recovery of diastolic function and partially blunted atrial remodeling in R92Wmice. This improved function was coupled to increased sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ATPase activity in the R92W animals despite reduction of CaMKII activation, likely indicating improvement in myocellular calcium handling. In contrast, inhibition of CaMKII in R92L animals led to worsened myocellular calcium handling, remodeling, and function. Diltiazem-HClarrested diastolic dysfunction progression in R92W animals only, with no improvement in cardiac remodeling in either genotype. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a highly specific, mutation-dependent role of activated CaMKII in HCM progression and a precise therapeutic target for clinical management of HCM in selected cohorts. Moreover, the mutation-specific response elicited with diltiazem highlights the necessity to understand mutation-dependent progression at a molecular level to precisely intervene in disease progression.
Authors: Mariell Jessup; Barry Greenberg; Donna Mancini; Thomas Cappola; Daniel F Pauly; Brian Jaski; Alex Yaroshinsky; Krisztina M Zsebo; Howard Dittrich; Roger J Hajjar Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-06-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Carolyn Y Ho; Allison L Cirino; Neal K Lakdawala; John Groarke; Anne Marie Valente; Christopher Semsarian; Steven D Colan; E John Orav Journal: Heart Date: 2016-09-02 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: C C Evans; J R Pena; R M Phillips; M Muthuchamy; D F Wieczorek; R J Solaro; B M Wolska Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: T Miller; D Szczesna; P R Housmans; J Zhao; F de Freitas; A V Gomes; L Culbreath; J McCue; Y Wang; Y Xu; W G Kerrick; J D Potter Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2000-11-01 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Adam S Helms; Francisco J Alvarado; Jaime Yob; Vi T Tang; Francis Pagani; Mark W Russell; Héctor H Valdivia; Sharlene M Day Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-09-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Barry Greenberg; Javed Butler; G Michael Felker; Piotr Ponikowski; Adriaan A Voors; Akshay S Desai; Denise Barnard; Alain Bouchard; Brian Jaski; Alexander R Lyon; Janice M Pogoda; Jeffrey J Rudy; Krisztina M Zsebo Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Adam S Helms; Vi T Tang; Thomas S O'Leary; Sabrina Friedline; Mick Wauchope; Akul Arora; Aaron H Wasserman; Eric D Smith; Lap Man Lee; Xiaoquan W Wen; Jordan A Shavit; Allen P Liu; Michael J Previs; Sharlene M Day Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2020-01-30
Authors: J Lukas Laws; Megan C Lancaster; M Ben Shoemaker; William G Stevenson; Rebecca R Hung; Quinn Wells; D Marshall Brinkley; Sean Hughes; Katherine Anderson; Dan Roden; Lynne W Stevenson Journal: Circ Res Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 23.213
Authors: Paul H Goldspink; Chad M Warren; Jan Kitajewski; Beata M Wolska; R John Solaro Journal: J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 3.271
Authors: Shamim A K Chowdhury; Chad M Warren; Jillian N Simon; David M Ryba; Ashley Batra; Peter Varga; Evangelia G Kranias; Jil C Tardiff; R John Solaro; Beata M Wolska Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2020-03-10 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Lorenzo R Sewanan; Jinkyu Park; Michael J Rynkiewicz; Alice W Racca; Nikolaos Papoutsidakis; Jonas Schwan; Daniel L Jacoby; Jeffrey R Moore; William Lehman; Yibing Qyang; Stuart G Campbell Journal: J Gen Physiol Date: 2021-07-28 Impact factor: 4.086
Authors: Jamie R Bhagwan; Diogo Mosqueira; Karolina Chairez-Cantu; Ingra Mannhardt; Sara E Bodbin; Mine Bakar; James G W Smith; Chris Denning Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2020-06-10 Impact factor: 5.000