Literature DB >> 30585738

Watch Your Distance: The Role of Laser Fiber Working Distance on Fragmentation When Altering Pulse Width or Modulation.

Ali H Aldoukhi1, William W Roberts1,2, Timothy L Hall2, Khurshid R Ghani1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Moses technology for the Ho:YAG laser introduces a pulse-shape modulation that optimizes energy delivery through water and can be utilized for lithotripsy at a distance from the target. In light of this advance, we undertook an in vitro study to assess the effect of fiber tip to stone distance on fragmentation, incorporating the use of a variety of pulse modes.
METHODS: Experiments were conducted with a three-dimensional (3D) positioning system, a 30 mm flat plate BegoStone, and a 230 μm core laser fiber connected to a 120W holmium laser utilizing short pulse (SP), long pulse (LP), Moses contact (MC), and Moses distance (MD) modes. Ablation crater volume was measured by 3D confocal microscopy, after a single pulse (1.0 J) was activated with the fiber tip positioned at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 mm from the stone. Fragmentation efficiency (1 J × 10 Hz) was assessed with the fiber tip at 0 and 1 mm distance, programmed to fragment the stone over 3 minutes. Fragmentation was defined as difference in stone mass before and after each experiment.
RESULTS: For all tested pulse modes, ablation crater volume and fragmentation were greatest when the fiber tip was in contact with the stone. Ablation declined as the working distance increased with no ablation occurring at 3 mm. At 1 mm distance, the ablation crater volume using MD mode was significantly higher when compared with SP, LP, and MC modes (p < 0.05). Compared with all pulse modes tested, MD resulted in 28% and 39% greater fragmentation at both 0 and 1 mm working distances, respectively (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Holmium laser lithotripsy is significantly affected by fiber working distance with the greatest ablation obtained with the fiber in contact with the stone. At 0 and 1 mm distance, MD had the greatest fragmentation efficiency, suggesting this mode may have advantages during ureteroscopy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Moses; dusting; holmium laser; kidney stone; lithotripsy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30585738     DOI: 10.1089/end.2018.0572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  13 in total

1.  Mechanisms of Pulse Modulated Holmium:YAG Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jason B King; Nitesh Katta; Joel M H Teichman; James W Tunnell; Thomas E Milner
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Initial clinical experience with the thulium fiber laser from Quanta System: First 50 reported cases.

Authors:  Alba Sierra; Mariela Corrales; Merkourios Kolvatzis; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 3.661

3.  Development of an automated laser drilling algorithm to compare stone ablation patterns from different laser pulse modes.

Authors:  Nikta Rezakahn Khajeh; Timothy L Hall; Khurshid R Ghani; William W Roberts
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  Comparison of stone retropulsion between Moses mode and virtual basket mode: an in vitro study using artificial stones.

Authors:  Shimpei Yamashita; Yohei Maruyama; Yukari Tasaka; Takaaki Inoue; Motohiro Yasuhara; Yasuo Kohjimoto; Tatsushi Matsumura; Isao Hara
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 2.861

5.  Cavitation Plays a Vital Role in Stone Dusting During Short Pulse Holmium:YAG Laser Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Junqin Chen; Derek S Ho; Gaoming Xiang; Georgy Sankin; Glenn M Preminger; Michael E Lipkin; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.619

Review 6.  New Generation Pulse Modulation in Holmium:YAG Lasers: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Antoni Sánchez-Puy; Alejandra Bravo-Balado; Pietro Diana; Michael Baboudjian; Alberto Piana; Irene Girón; Andrés K Kanashiro; Oriol Angerri; Pablo Contreras; Brian H Eisner; Josep Balañà; Francisco M Sánchez-Martín; Félix Millán; Joan Palou; Esteban Emiliani
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: aspects of intracorporeal lithotripsy in flexible ureterorenoscopy.

Authors:  Søren Kissow Lildal; Kim Hovgaard Andreassen; Joyce Baard; Marianne Brehmer; Matthew Bultitude; Ylva Eriksson; Khurshid R Ghani; Helene Jung; Guido Kamphuis; Peter Kronenberg; Ben Turney; Olivier Traxer; Øyvind Ulvik; Palle Jörn Sloth Osther
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Comparison of Different Pulse Modulation Modes for Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser Lithotripsy Ablation in a Benchtop Model.

Authors:  Russell S Terry; Derek S Ho; Dominick M Scialabba; Patrick S Whelan; Robert Qi; Brian T Ketterman; Glenn M Preminger; Pei Zhong; Michael E Lipkin
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 2.619

9.  The Role of Cavitation in Energy Delivery and Stone Damage During Laser Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Derek S Ho; Dominick Scialabba; Russell S Terry; Xiaojian Ma; Junqin Chen; Georgy N Sankin; Gaoming Xiang; Robert Qi; Glenn M Preminger; Michael E Lipkin; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.619

10.  Laser Fiber Displacement Velocity during Tm-Fiber and Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripsy: Introducing the Concept of Optimal Displacement Velocity.

Authors:  Frederic Panthier; Thibault Germain; Cyril Gorny; Laurent Berthe; Steeve Doizi; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.