| Literature DB >> 30583546 |
Jimin Jeon1, Jiyoung Jang2, Kyong Park3.
Abstract
The effect of calcium consumption in the prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains controversial, and depends on food calcium sources. This prospective study aimed to evaluate the association between calcium-rich food consumption and T2DM incidence among Korean adults. We analyzed the data of 8574 adults aged 40⁻69 years, without a history of T2DM, cardiovascular disease, and cancer at the baseline from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study. The consumption of calcium-rich foods was assessed using a validated semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. T2DM-related data were collected using biennial questionnaires, health examinations, and clinical tests. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. In the multivariate-adjusted model, yogurt intake was inversely associated with T2DM risk (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.61⁻0.88 in the fourth quartile as compared to the first quartile). However, the intakes of other calcium-rich foods, including milk and anchovies, were not significantly associated with T2DM risk. Yogurt may provide protective effects against T2DM in Korean adults, owing to the beneficial effects of probiotics. Further prospective large-scale cohort studies should be conducted to validate these findings.Entities:
Keywords: Korean adults; calcium; type 2 diabetes mellitus; yogurt
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30583546 PMCID: PMC6357094 DOI: 10.3390/nu11010031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Flow chart showing the participant selection process. KoGES, Korean Genome and Epidemiology study.
Baseline characteristics of participants according to quartiles (Q) of energy-adjusted total calcium product intake.
| Total Calcium Product Intake (Quartile) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | ||
|
| 2143 | 2144 | 2144 | 2143 | |
|
| 7.0 | 12.2 | 17.6 | 26.9 | |
|
| 1272 (59.4) | 1190 (55.5) | 1009 (47.1) | 613 (28.6) | <0.001 |
|
| 51.4 ± 0.2 | 50.7 ± 0.2 | 51.4 ± 0.2 | 53.3 ± 0.2 | <0.001 |
|
| <0.001 | ||||
| Ansung | 1318 (61.5) | 902 (42.1) | 867 (40.4) | 1033 (48.2) | |
| Ansan | 825 (38.5) | 1242 (57.9) | 1277 (59.6) | 1110 (51.8) | |
|
| <0.001 | ||||
| Elementary school graduation or lower | 744 (35.0) | 609 (28.6) | 635 (29.8) | 770 (36.1) | |
| Middle school graduation | 494 (23.2) | 470 (22.1) | 474 (22.2) | 522 (24.5) | |
| High school graduation | 629 (29.6) | 725 (34.0) | 699 (32.8) | 594 (27.8) | |
| College graduation or higher | 260 (12.2) | 328 (15.4) | 325 (15.2) | 248 (11.6) | |
|
| <0.001 | ||||
| <1,000,000 | 861 (40.7) | 643 (30.3) | 625 (29.5) | 753 (35.7) | |
| 1,000,000–<2,000,000 | 626 (29.6) | 640 (30.2) | 591 (27.9) | 639 (30.3) | |
| 2,000,000–<4,000,000 | 525 (24.8) | 660 (31.2) | 687 (32.5) | 563 (26.7) | |
| ≥4,000,000 | 103 (4.9) | 176 (8.3) | 213 (10.1) | 153 (7.3) | |
|
| 24.5 ± 0.1 | 24.5 ± 0.1 | 24.6 ± 0.1 | 24.5 ± 0.1 | 0.3 |
|
| <0.001 | ||||
| Low | 674 (31.6) | 773 (36.3) | 713 (33.7) | 678 (31.9) | |
| Mid | 563 (26.4) | 719 (33.8) | 760 (35.9) | 789 (37.1) | |
| High | 894 (42.0) | 638 (30.0) | 646 (30.5) | 661 (31.1) | |
|
| 1113 (52.2) | 1152 (53.9) | 1050 (49.2) | 808 (37.9) | <0.001 |
|
| <0.001 | ||||
| Non-smokers | 1031 (48.5) | 1151 (53.9) | 1260 (59.5) | 1557 (73.5) | |
| Former smokers | 361 (17.0) | 378 (17.7) | 331 (15.6) | 217 (10.3) | |
| Smokers | 736 (34.6) | 606 (28.4) | 528 (24.9) | 344 (16.2) | |
|
| 277 (13.1) | 347 (16.4) | 409 (19.4) | 541 (25.3) | <0.001 |
Values are mean ± standard error or n (%); KRW is Korean Republic Won; a p values are derived from χ2 test for categorical variables and from generalized linear regression analysis for continuous variables; b Physical activity was categorized into three groups, according to tertile of metabolic equivalents (MET)-hours/week.
Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for diabetes risk according to energy-adjusted calcium product intake level.
| Frequency of Consumption (Quartile) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | ||
|
| |||||
| Median, servings/week | 0 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 8.0 | |
| Case/ | 307/2139 | 305/2140 | 271/2140 | 288/2139 | |
| Person year | 13,815 | 15,407 | 15,750 | 15,312 | |
| Model 1 | 1 | 0.89 (0.76, 1.05) | 0.78 (0.66, 0.91) | 0.85 (0.72, 1.00) | 0.2 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 1.00 (0.85, 1.18) | 0.95 (0.80, 1.12) | 1.04 (0.88, 1.23) | 0.6 |
| Model 3 | 1 | 1.05 (0.88, 1.25) | 0.95 (0.79, 1.13) | 1.05 (0.88, 1.25) | 0.7 |
|
| |||||
| Median, servings/week | 0 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 5.0 | |
| Case/ | 323/2139 | 311/2139 | 295/2040 | 241/2139 | |
| Person year | 13,246 | 15,558 | 15,751 | 15,708 | |
| Model 1 | 1 | 0.82 (0.70, 0.96) | 0.77 (0.66, 0.90) | 0.63 (0.53, 0.74) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 0.83 (0.71, 0.97) | 0.84 (0.72, 0.99) | 0.72 (0.60, 0.86) | 0.002 |
| Model 3 | 1 | 0.82 (0.70, 0.97) | 0.84 (0.70, 0.99) | 0.73 (0.61, 0.88) | 0.01 |
|
| |||||
| Median, servings/week | 0.2 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 4.6 | |
| Case/ | 310/2141 | 291/2141 | 282/2142 | 288/2141 | |
| Person year | 13,596 | 15,607 | 15,830 | 15,281 | |
| Model 1 | 1 | 0.82 (0.70, 0.96) | 0.78 (0.66, 0.92) | 0.83 (0.70, 0.97) | 0.1 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 0.93 (0.79, 1.10) | 0.86 (0.73, 1.02) | 0.89 (0.75, 1.05) | 0.3 |
| Model 3 | 1 | 0.91 (0.77, 1.08) | 0.82 (0.69, 0.98) | 0.87 (0.73, 1.04) | 0.2 |
|
| |||||
| Median, servings/week | 4.0 | 7.1 | 10.5 | 17.6 | |
| Case/ | 327/2143 | 296/2144 | 257/2144 | 293/2143 | |
| Person year | 14,635 | 15,564 | 15,499 | 14,688 | |
| Model 1 | 1 | 0.83 (0.70, 0.97) | 0.81 (0.69, 0.95) | 1.07 (0.91, 1.25) | 0.1 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 0.91 (0.77, 1.08) | 0.86 (0.72, 1.02) | 1.05 (0.89, 1.24) | 0.4 |
| Model 3 | 1 | 0.86 (0.72, 1.03) | 0.78 (0.85, 0.93) | 0.97 (0.81, 1.16) | 1.0 |
|
| |||||
| Median, servings/week | 7.0 | 12.2 | 17.6 | 26.9 | |
| Case/ | 341/2143 | 276/2144 | 284/2144 | 272/2143 | |
| Person year | 14,526 | 15,512 | 15,395 | 14,953 | |
| Model 1 | 1 | 0.77 (0.66, 0.91) | 0.82 (0.70, 0.97) | 0.93 (0.79, 1.08) | 0.8 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 0.85 (0.72, 1.00) | 0.88 (0.74, 1.04) | 0.98 (0.83, 1.16) | 0.9 |
| Model 3 | 1 | 0.82 (0.69, 0.97) | 0.83 (0.70, 0.99) | 0.92 (0.77, 1.11) | 0.7 |
* Sum of cheese, tofu, perilla leaves, sea mustard, laver, and lettuce; Model 1: unadjusted; Model 2: adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, residential area, education level, household income, physical activity, alcohol consumption, and smoking status; Model 3: additionally adjusted for history of hypertension, family history of type 2 diabetes, use of antihypertensive medication, use of dietary supplements, and intakes of vegetables, fruits, red meat, processed meat, soft drinks, coffee, and tea; Q, quartile.
Figure 2Effect of various demographic factors on the association between yogurt intake and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs, shown in parentheses) of T2DM in the fourth quartile of energy-adjusted yogurt intake were compared to the first quartile based on sex, body mass index, alcohol consumption, and smoking status. Values were adjusted for the listed variables simultaneously and other potential confounders which included age, residential area, education level, household income, physical activity, history of hypertension, family history of type 2 diabetes, use of antihypertensive medication, use of dietary supplements, and intakes of vegetables, fruits, red meat, processed meat, soft drinks, coffee, and tea. BMI, body mass index.