Literature DB >> 30582767

Rigidity and flexibility characteristics of DD[E/D]-transposases Mos1 and Sleeping Beauty.

Christopher M Singer1, Diana Joy1, Donald J Jacobs1,2, Irina V Nesmelova1,2.   

Abstract

DD[E/D]-transposases catalyze the multistep reaction of cut-and-paste DNA transposition. Structurally, several DD[E/D]-transposases have been characterized, revealing a multi-domain structure with the catalytic domain possessing the RNase H-like structural motif that brings three catalytic residues (D, D, and E or D) into close proximity for the catalysis. However, the dynamic behavior of DD[E/D]-transposases during transposition remains poorly understood. Here, we analyze the rigidity and flexibility characteristics of two representative DD[E/D]-transposases Mos1 and Sleeping Beauty (SB) using the minimal distance constraint model (mDCM). We find that the catalytic domain of both transposases is globally rigid, with the notable exception of the clamp loop being flexible in the DNA-unbound form. Within this globally rigid structure, the central β-sheet of the RNase H-like motif is much less rigid in comparison to its surrounding α-helices, forming a cage-like structure. The comparison of the original SB transposase to its hyperactive version SB100X reveals the region where the change in flexibility/rigidity correlates with increased activity. This region is found to be within the RNase H-like structural motif and comprise the loop leading from beta-strand B3 to helix H1, helices H1 and H2, which are located on the same side of the central beta-sheet, and the loop between helix H3 and beta-strand B5. We further identify the RKEN214-217DAVQ mutations of the set of hyperactive mutations within the catalytic domain of SB transposase to be the driving factor that induces change in residue-pair rigidity correlations within SB transposase. Given that a signature RNase H-like structural motif is found in DD[E/D]-transposases and, more broadly, in a large superfamily of polynucleotidyl transferases, our results are relevant to these proteins as well.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA transposon; distance constraint model; dynamics; flexibility and rigidity; fluorescence; protein-DNA complex; transposase

Year:  2019        PMID: 30582767      PMCID: PMC6408976          DOI: 10.1002/prot.25653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  58 in total

1.  Protein flexibility predictions using graph theory.

Authors:  D J Jacobs; A J Rader; L A Kuhn; M F Thorpe
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-08-01

2.  GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free.

Authors:  David Van Der Spoel; Erik Lindahl; Berk Hess; Gerrit Groenhof; Alan E Mark; Herman J C Berendsen
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 3.  Retroviral integrase superfamily: the structural perspective.

Authors:  Marcin Nowotny
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Three new structures of the core domain of HIV-1 integrase: an active site that binds magnesium.

Authors:  Y Goldgur; F Dyda; A B Hickman; T M Jenkins; R Craigie; D R Davies
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-08-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Crystal structure of the catalytic domain of HIV-1 integrase: similarity to other polynucleotidyl transferases.

Authors:  F Dyda; A B Hickman; T M Jenkins; A Engelman; R Craigie; D R Davies
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-12-23       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns.

Authors:  M B Eisen; P T Spellman; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  The emerging diversity of transpososome architectures.

Authors:  Fred Dyda; Michael Chandler; Alison Burgess Hickman
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.318

8.  A dynamic model of HIV integrase inhibition and drug resistance.

Authors:  Alex L Perryman; Stefano Forli; Garrett M Morris; Catherine Burt; Yuhui Cheng; Michael J Palmer; Kevin Whitby; J Andrew McCammon; Chris Phillips; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Changes in Lysozyme Flexibility upon Mutation Are Frequent, Large and Long-Ranged.

Authors:  Deeptak Verma; Donald J Jacobs; Dennis R Livesay
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Hyperactive mariner transposons are created by mutations that disrupt allosterism and increase the rate of transposon end synapsis.

Authors:  Danxu Liu; Ronald Chalmers
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.