OBJECTIVE: We use a resolution matrix-based Bayesian framework to compare inversion methods for tomographic fluorescence lifetime multiplexing in a diffuse medium, such as biological tissue. METHODS: We consider three inversion methods; an asymptotic time domain (ATD) approach, based on a multiexponential analysis of time domain data, a direct time domain (DTD) approach, which is a minimum error solution, and a cross-talk constrained time domain (CCTD) inversion, which is a solution to an optimization problem that minimizes both error and cross-talk. We compare these methods using Monte Carlo simulations and time domain fluorescence measurements with tissue-mimicking phantoms. RESULTS: The ATD approach provides high accuracy of relative quantitation and spatial localization of two fluorophores embedded in a 18-mm thick turbid medium, with concentration ratios of up to 1:4.25. DTD leads to significant errors in relative quantitation and localization. CCTD provides improved quantitation accuracy over DTD, and better spatial resolution compared to ATD. We present a rigorous theoretical basis for these results and provide a complete derivation of the CCTD estimator. The Bayesian analysis also leads to a formula for rapid computation of the DTD inverse operator for large-scale tomography measurements. CONCLUSION: The ATD and CCTD inversion methods provide significant advantages over DTD for accurately estimating multiple overlapping fluorophores. SIGNIFICANCE: Time domain fluorescence tomography, using zero cross-talk estimators, can serve as a powerful tool for quantifying multiple fluorescently labeled biological processes. The Bayesian framework presented here can be applied to general multiparameter inverse problems for the quantitative estimation of multiple overlapping parameters.
OBJECTIVE: We use a resolution matrix-based Bayesian framework to compare inversion methods for tomographic fluorescence lifetime multiplexing in a diffuse medium, such as biological tissue. METHODS: We consider three inversion methods; an asymptotic time domain (ATD) approach, based on a multiexponential analysis of time domain data, a direct time domain (DTD) approach, which is a minimum error solution, and a cross-talk constrained time domain (CCTD) inversion, which is a solution to an optimization problem that minimizes both error and cross-talk. We compare these methods using Monte Carlo simulations and time domain fluorescence measurements with tissue-mimicking phantoms. RESULTS: The ATD approach provides high accuracy of relative quantitation and spatial localization of two fluorophores embedded in a 18-mm thick turbid medium, with concentration ratios of up to 1:4.25. DTD leads to significant errors in relative quantitation and localization. CCTD provides improved quantitation accuracy over DTD, and better spatial resolution compared to ATD. We present a rigorous theoretical basis for these results and provide a complete derivation of the CCTD estimator. The Bayesian analysis also leads to a formula for rapid computation of the DTD inverse operator for large-scale tomography measurements. CONCLUSION: The ATD and CCTD inversion methods provide significant advantages over DTD for accurately estimating multiple overlapping fluorophores. SIGNIFICANCE: Time domain fluorescence tomography, using zero cross-talk estimators, can serve as a powerful tool for quantifying multiple fluorescently labeled biological processes. The Bayesian framework presented here can be applied to general multiparameter inverse problems for the quantitative estimation of multiple overlapping parameters.
Authors: Anand T N Kumar; Scott B Raymond; Andrew K Dunn; Brian J Bacskai; David A Boas Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 10.048